Diagnostic Potential of CTRP5 and Chemerin for Coronary Artery Disease: A Study by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15020206
Taha Okan, Cihan Altın, Caner Topaloglu, Mehmet Doruk, Mehmet Birhan Yılmaz
{"title":"Diagnostic Potential of CTRP5 and Chemerin for Coronary Artery Disease: A Study by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.","authors":"Taha Okan, Cihan Altın, Caner Topaloglu, Mehmet Doruk, Mehmet Birhan Yılmaz","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15020206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: As an endocrine organ, adipose tissue produces adipokines that influence coronary artery disease (CAD). The objective of this study was to assess the potential value of CTRP5 and chemerin in differentiating coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-confirmed coronary artery disease (CAD) versus non-CAD. Secondarily, within the CCTA-confirmed CAD group, the aim was to investigate the relationship between the severity and extent of CAD, as determined by coronary artery calcium score (CACS), and the levels of CTRP5 and chemerin. <b>Methods</b>: Consecutive individuals with chest pain underwent CCTA to evaluate coronary artery anatomy and were divided into two groups. The CCTA-confirmed CAD group included patients with any atherosclerotic plaque (soft, mixed, or calcified) regardless of calcification, while the non-CAD group consisted of individuals without plaques on CCTA, with zero CACS, and without ischemia on stress ECG. Secondarily, in the CCTA-confirmed CAD group, the severity and extent of CAD were evaluated using CACS. Blood samples were collected and stored at -80 °C for analysis of CTRP5 and chemerin levels via ELISA. <b>Results</b>: Serum CTRP5 and chemerin levels were significantly higher in the CAD group compared to the non-CAD group (221.83 ± 103.81 vs. 149.35 ± 50.99 ng/mL, <i>p</i> = 0.003 and 105.02 ± 35.62 vs. 86.07 ± 19.47 ng/mL, <i>p</i> = 0.005, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that a CTRP5 cutoff of 172.30 ng/mL had 70% sensitivity and 73% specificity for identifying CAD, while a chemerin cutoff of 90.46 ng/mL had 61% sensitivity and 62% specificity. A strong positive correlation was observed between CTRP5 and chemerin, but neither adipokine showed a correlation with the Agatston score, a measure of CAD severity and extent, nor with coronary artery stenosis as determined by CCTA. <b>Conclusions</b>: CTRP5 and chemerin were significantly elevated in the CCTA-confirmed CAD group compared to the non-CAD group, with CTRP5 showing greater sensitivity and specificity. However, neither adipokine was linked to CAD severity and extent, differing from findings based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). CTRP5 may serve as a promising \"all-or-none biomarker\" for CAD presence.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11765540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: As an endocrine organ, adipose tissue produces adipokines that influence coronary artery disease (CAD). The objective of this study was to assess the potential value of CTRP5 and chemerin in differentiating coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-confirmed coronary artery disease (CAD) versus non-CAD. Secondarily, within the CCTA-confirmed CAD group, the aim was to investigate the relationship between the severity and extent of CAD, as determined by coronary artery calcium score (CACS), and the levels of CTRP5 and chemerin. Methods: Consecutive individuals with chest pain underwent CCTA to evaluate coronary artery anatomy and were divided into two groups. The CCTA-confirmed CAD group included patients with any atherosclerotic plaque (soft, mixed, or calcified) regardless of calcification, while the non-CAD group consisted of individuals without plaques on CCTA, with zero CACS, and without ischemia on stress ECG. Secondarily, in the CCTA-confirmed CAD group, the severity and extent of CAD were evaluated using CACS. Blood samples were collected and stored at -80 °C for analysis of CTRP5 and chemerin levels via ELISA. Results: Serum CTRP5 and chemerin levels were significantly higher in the CAD group compared to the non-CAD group (221.83 ± 103.81 vs. 149.35 ± 50.99 ng/mL, p = 0.003 and 105.02 ± 35.62 vs. 86.07 ± 19.47 ng/mL, p = 0.005, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that a CTRP5 cutoff of 172.30 ng/mL had 70% sensitivity and 73% specificity for identifying CAD, while a chemerin cutoff of 90.46 ng/mL had 61% sensitivity and 62% specificity. A strong positive correlation was observed between CTRP5 and chemerin, but neither adipokine showed a correlation with the Agatston score, a measure of CAD severity and extent, nor with coronary artery stenosis as determined by CCTA. Conclusions: CTRP5 and chemerin were significantly elevated in the CCTA-confirmed CAD group compared to the non-CAD group, with CTRP5 showing greater sensitivity and specificity. However, neither adipokine was linked to CAD severity and extent, differing from findings based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). CTRP5 may serve as a promising "all-or-none biomarker" for CAD presence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CTRP5和Chemerin对冠状动脉疾病的诊断潜力:冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影研究。
背景/目的:脂肪组织作为一种内分泌器官,产生影响冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的脂肪因子。本研究的目的是评估CTRP5和趋化素在鉴别冠状动脉计算机断层造影(CCTA)确诊的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)与非CAD中的潜在价值。其次,在ccta确认的CAD组中,目的是研究冠心病的严重程度和程度之间的关系,由冠状动脉钙评分(CACS)和CTRP5和趋化素水平决定。方法:连续胸痛患者行CCTA检查冠状动脉解剖,并分为两组。CCTA确认的CAD组包括任何动脉粥样硬化斑块(软质、混合性或钙化),无论是否钙化的患者,而非CAD组由CCTA上没有斑块、无CACS、无应激ECG上缺血的个体组成。其次,在ccta确认的CAD组中,使用CACS评估CAD的严重程度和程度。采集血样,-80℃保存,ELISA检测CTRP5和趋化素水平。结果:CAD组血清CTRP5、趋化素水平显著高于非CAD组(221.83±103.81∶149.35±50.99 ng/mL, p = 0.003; 105.02±35.62∶86.07±19.47 ng/mL, p = 0.005)。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析显示,CTRP5阈值为172.30 ng/mL时,诊断CAD的敏感性为70%,特异性为73%;chemerin阈值为90.46 ng/mL时,诊断CAD的敏感性为61%,特异性为62%。CTRP5与chemerin之间存在很强的正相关,但脂肪因子与Agatston评分(一种衡量CAD严重程度和程度的指标)和CCTA测定的冠状动脉狭窄均无相关性。结论:与非CAD组相比,ccta确诊的CAD组CTRP5和chemerin明显升高,且CTRP5具有更高的敏感性和特异性。然而,与基于有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)的结果不同,这两种脂肪因子都与CAD的严重程度和程度无关。CTRP5可能作为一种有希望的“全或无”CAD存在的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Impact of Different Skeletal Orthodontic Anomalies on Condylar Asymmetry Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Association Between Serum Testosterone Levels and Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Cross-Sectional Study in Central European Population. A Novel Dual-Modality Dual-View Hybrid Deep Learning-Machine Learning Framework for the Prediction of Carotid Plaque Vulnerability via Late Fusion. AI-Assisted OCT Imaging for Core Needle Biopsy Guidance: The 1st in Humans Study. Assessment of Optimal Stent Implantation with the Use of Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1