Pre-injury narcotic drug use in isolated severe traumatic brain injury: effect on outcomes.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02743-0
Keishi Yamaguchi, Kyosuke Takahashi, Dominik Andreas Jakob, Takeru Abe, Kazuhide Matsushima, Demetrios Demetriades
{"title":"Pre-injury narcotic drug use in isolated severe traumatic brain injury: effect on outcomes.","authors":"Keishi Yamaguchi, Kyosuke Takahashi, Dominik Andreas Jakob, Takeru Abe, Kazuhide Matsushima, Demetrios Demetriades","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02743-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore the association between pre-injury narcotic drug use (opioids, methadone, and/or oxycodone) and outcomes in isolated severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ACS TQIP study included adult trauma patients (≥ 16 years) with complete drug and alcohol screening. Isolated severe TBI was defined as head trauma with AIS 3-5 and without significant extracranial trauma. Exact matching was used to compare patients with isolated pre-injury narcotic drug use to those with no illicit drug or alcohol use. Patients were matched 1:1 based on the following matching criteria: age, gender, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, systolic blood pressure, head AIS, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,846,630 patients, 141,058 had isolated severe head injuries with complete drug and alcohol screenings. After exact matching, 1,560 patients in each group were analyzed. There were no significant differences in hospital mortality, craniectomy rates, complication rates, or length of hospital stay. Patients that tested positive for narcotics had lower rates of mechanical ventilation (16.5% vs. 25.3%, p < 0.01) and shorter ICU stays [3 (2-4) days vs. 3 (2-6) days; p < 0.01].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-injury narcotic drug use in isolated severe TBI is not associates with adverse outcomes. Further research is needed to understand the biochemical and physiological effects of narcotic drugs on TBI outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02743-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore the association between pre-injury narcotic drug use (opioids, methadone, and/or oxycodone) and outcomes in isolated severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients.

Methods: ACS TQIP study included adult trauma patients (≥ 16 years) with complete drug and alcohol screening. Isolated severe TBI was defined as head trauma with AIS 3-5 and without significant extracranial trauma. Exact matching was used to compare patients with isolated pre-injury narcotic drug use to those with no illicit drug or alcohol use. Patients were matched 1:1 based on the following matching criteria: age, gender, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, systolic blood pressure, head AIS, and comorbidities.

Results: Of 1,846,630 patients, 141,058 had isolated severe head injuries with complete drug and alcohol screenings. After exact matching, 1,560 patients in each group were analyzed. There were no significant differences in hospital mortality, craniectomy rates, complication rates, or length of hospital stay. Patients that tested positive for narcotics had lower rates of mechanical ventilation (16.5% vs. 25.3%, p < 0.01) and shorter ICU stays [3 (2-4) days vs. 3 (2-6) days; p < 0.01].

Conclusion: Pre-injury narcotic drug use in isolated severe TBI is not associates with adverse outcomes. Further research is needed to understand the biochemical and physiological effects of narcotic drugs on TBI outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孤立性重型颅脑损伤损伤前使用麻醉药物:对预后的影响。
目的:本研究旨在探讨孤立性重型颅脑损伤(TBI)患者损伤前麻醉药物(阿片类药物、美沙酮和/或羟考酮)使用与预后的关系。方法:ACS TQIP研究纳入了完成药物和酒精筛查的成人创伤患者(≥16岁)。孤立性严重TBI定义为AIS 3-5且无明显颅外创伤的头部创伤。采用精确匹配的方法比较损伤前单独使用麻醉药品的患者与未使用非法药物或酒精的患者。根据以下匹配标准:年龄、性别、损伤机制、损伤严重程度评分、收缩压、头部AIS、合并症,对患者进行1:1匹配。结果:在1,846,630例患者中,141,058例有完全的药物和酒精筛查的分离性严重头部损伤。经过精确匹配后,对每组1560例患者进行分析。两组在住院死亡率、开颅率、并发症发生率或住院时间方面无显著差异。麻醉药物检测阳性的患者机械通气率较低(16.5% vs. 25.3%)。结论:孤立性严重TBI损伤前使用麻醉药物与不良后果无关。麻醉药物对创伤性脑损伤预后的生化和生理影响有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
期刊最新文献
Examining the relationship between social deprivation index and pedestrian injuries in a suburban setting: Is that the only factor? Risk factors and long-term outcomes in anterior iliac and obturator hip dislocation. Noninvasive ventilation in chest trauma-related acute respiratory failure related to chest trauma: Efficacy and risk of pneumothorax. Scintigraphy for the diagnosis of primary unrecognised fractures in multiple trauma patients - a prospective, blinded, monocentric study. Evolving fracture management: the role of helical plating in orthopaedic trauma surgery - a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1