Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage from Computed Tomography Images: Diagnostic Role and Efficacy of ChatGPT-4o.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15020143
Mustafa Koyun, Zeycan Kubra Cevval, Bahadir Reis, Bunyamin Ece
{"title":"Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage from Computed Tomography Images: Diagnostic Role and Efficacy of ChatGPT-4o.","authors":"Mustafa Koyun, Zeycan Kubra Cevval, Bahadir Reis, Bunyamin Ece","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15020143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiological image analysis is rapidly evolving. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer Omni (GPT-4 Omni) in detecting intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs) in non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) images, along with its ability to classify hemorrhage type, stage, anatomical location, and associated findings. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective study was conducted using 240 cases, comprising 120 ICH cases and 120 controls with normal findings. Five consecutive NCCT slices per case were selected by radiologists and analyzed by ChatGPT-4o using a standardized prompt with nine questions. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by comparing the model's results with radiologists' assessments (the gold standard). After a two-week interval, the same dataset was re-evaluated to assess intra-observer reliability and consistency. <b>Results:</b> ChatGPT-4o achieved 100% accuracy in identifying imaging modality type. For ICH detection, the model demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 68.3%, sensitivity of 79.2%, specificity of 57.5%, PPV of 65.1%, and NPV of 73.4%. It correctly classified 34.0% of hemorrhage types and 7.3% of localizations. All ICH-positive cases were identified as acute phase (100%). In the second evaluation, diagnostic accuracy improved to 73.3%, with a sensitivity of 86.7% and a specificity of 60%. The Cohen's Kappa coefficient for intra-observer agreement in ICH detection indicated moderate agreement (κ = 0.469). <b>Conclusions:</b> ChatGPT-4o shows promise in identifying imaging modalities and ICH presence but demonstrates limitations in localization and hemorrhage type classification. These findings highlight its potential for improvement through targeted training for medical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiological image analysis is rapidly evolving. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer Omni (GPT-4 Omni) in detecting intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs) in non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) images, along with its ability to classify hemorrhage type, stage, anatomical location, and associated findings. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using 240 cases, comprising 120 ICH cases and 120 controls with normal findings. Five consecutive NCCT slices per case were selected by radiologists and analyzed by ChatGPT-4o using a standardized prompt with nine questions. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by comparing the model's results with radiologists' assessments (the gold standard). After a two-week interval, the same dataset was re-evaluated to assess intra-observer reliability and consistency. Results: ChatGPT-4o achieved 100% accuracy in identifying imaging modality type. For ICH detection, the model demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 68.3%, sensitivity of 79.2%, specificity of 57.5%, PPV of 65.1%, and NPV of 73.4%. It correctly classified 34.0% of hemorrhage types and 7.3% of localizations. All ICH-positive cases were identified as acute phase (100%). In the second evaluation, diagnostic accuracy improved to 73.3%, with a sensitivity of 86.7% and a specificity of 60%. The Cohen's Kappa coefficient for intra-observer agreement in ICH detection indicated moderate agreement (κ = 0.469). Conclusions: ChatGPT-4o shows promise in identifying imaging modalities and ICH presence but demonstrates limitations in localization and hemorrhage type classification. These findings highlight its potential for improvement through targeted training for medical applications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机断层图像检测颅内出血:chatgpt - 40的诊断作用和疗效。
背景/目的:人工智能(AI)在放射图像分析中的作用正在迅速发展。本研究评估了Chat - Generative Pre-trained Transformer Omni (GPT-4 Omni)在非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT)图像中检测颅内出血(ICHs)的诊断性能,以及其对出血类型、分期、解剖位置和相关发现进行分类的能力。方法:对240例脑出血患者进行回顾性研究,其中脑出血患者120例,正常对照组120例。每个病例由放射科医生选择5个连续的NCCT切片,并由chatgpt - 40使用包含9个问题的标准化提示进行分析。通过将模型结果与放射科医生的评估(金标准)进行比较,计算诊断准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。间隔两周后,重新评估相同的数据集,以评估观察者内部的可靠性和一致性。结果:chatgpt - 40识别成像模态类型的准确率达到100%。对于脑出血检测,该模型的诊断准确率为68.3%,敏感性为79.2%,特异性为57.5%,PPV为65.1%,NPV为73.4%。它正确分类了34.0%的出血类型和7.3%的定位。所有ich阳性病例均为急性期(100%)。在第二次评估中,诊断准确率提高到73.3%,敏感性为86.7%,特异性为60%。颅内出血检测中观察者间一致性的Cohen’s Kappa系数为中度一致性(κ = 0.469)。结论:chatgpt - 40在识别成像模式和脑出血存在方面有希望,但在定位和出血类型分类方面存在局限性。这些发现强调了通过有针对性的医疗应用培训来改进它的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of Withdrawal Syndrome in Parkinson's Disease Patients After Cessation of Deep Brain Stimulation. Psychological Morbidity After Ocular Trauma: Association Between Initial Visual Loss and PTSD. Breast Cancer Classification Using Feature Selection via Improved Simulated Annealing and SVM Classifier. Beyond the Image Frame: An Art-Based Pedagogical Framework for Teaching Diagnostic Reasoning in Breast Ultrasound to Medical Students. Comprehensive Sonographic Paradigm and Trend Pattern of Median Nerve Indices in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome from Wrist to Forearm: What We Need to Know.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1