Determinants of Success in Revision Cochlear Implant Surgeries: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Patient, Surgical, and Radiological Factors.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15020186
Sarah Alshehri, Thikra Khalid Hamdi Alasmari
{"title":"Determinants of Success in Revision Cochlear Implant Surgeries: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Patient, Surgical, and Radiological Factors.","authors":"Sarah Alshehri, Thikra Khalid Hamdi Alasmari","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15020186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aims to evaluate factors influencing revision cochlear implant surgeries, including patient demographics, surgical techniques, and radiological findings. The main aim was to identify factors influencing surgical success to inform clinical treatment and enhance patient outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional study included adult patients over the age of 18 who underwent revision cochlear implant surgery due to implant-related complications. Data were collected from systematic chart reviews of electronic medical records, including demographics, surgical techniques, radiological output from standard high-resolution CT and MRI, and intraoperative data. The primary outcome was surgical success, defined by improved auditory function, stable device positioning, and absence of postoperative complications. Statistical analyses, including multivariate logistic regression, were conducted to identify independent predictors of surgical success. <b>Results:</b> A total of 188 patients were included, with a mean age of 45.67 years. Younger age, shorter duration of implant use, modified surgical techniques, and absence of co-morbidities are key factors contributing to surgical success. Modified surgical techniques were associated with better outcomes (39.29% vs. 68.75%, OR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.25-6.14, <i>p</i> = 0.012). Radiological patterns significantly affected outcomes, with normal findings associated with higher success rates. In contrast, abnormalities such as electrode migration (OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.12-4.09, <i>p</i> = 0.021) and ossification (r = -0.51, β = -0.44, adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.25, <i>p</i> < 0.01) were correlated with poorer results. Smoking status, when comparing smokers to non-smokers, was associated with unfavorable outcomes (20.00% vs. 45.83%, OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.01-4.01, <i>p</i> = 0.048), and a history of previous surgeries (21.43% vs. 37.50%, OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.03-3.71, <i>p</i> = 0.033) was significantly associated with unfavorable outcomes. <b>Conclusions:</b> Statistically, significantly better outcomes are positively correlated with the duration of the first cochlear implant experience and negatively with prior otologic pathology and nonauditory environmental influences on surgical success. Younger age, modified surgical techniques, and normal radiological findings were related to better outcomes; complications such as electrode migration and ectopic ossification were strong predictive factors for surgical failure. These findings underscore the need for tailored surgical approaches and early intervention to enhance outcomes in revision cochlear implant surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11765166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study aims to evaluate factors influencing revision cochlear implant surgeries, including patient demographics, surgical techniques, and radiological findings. The main aim was to identify factors influencing surgical success to inform clinical treatment and enhance patient outcomes. Methods: This cross-sectional study included adult patients over the age of 18 who underwent revision cochlear implant surgery due to implant-related complications. Data were collected from systematic chart reviews of electronic medical records, including demographics, surgical techniques, radiological output from standard high-resolution CT and MRI, and intraoperative data. The primary outcome was surgical success, defined by improved auditory function, stable device positioning, and absence of postoperative complications. Statistical analyses, including multivariate logistic regression, were conducted to identify independent predictors of surgical success. Results: A total of 188 patients were included, with a mean age of 45.67 years. Younger age, shorter duration of implant use, modified surgical techniques, and absence of co-morbidities are key factors contributing to surgical success. Modified surgical techniques were associated with better outcomes (39.29% vs. 68.75%, OR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.25-6.14, p = 0.012). Radiological patterns significantly affected outcomes, with normal findings associated with higher success rates. In contrast, abnormalities such as electrode migration (OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.12-4.09, p = 0.021) and ossification (r = -0.51, β = -0.44, adjusted R2 = 0.25, p < 0.01) were correlated with poorer results. Smoking status, when comparing smokers to non-smokers, was associated with unfavorable outcomes (20.00% vs. 45.83%, OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.01-4.01, p = 0.048), and a history of previous surgeries (21.43% vs. 37.50%, OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.03-3.71, p = 0.033) was significantly associated with unfavorable outcomes. Conclusions: Statistically, significantly better outcomes are positively correlated with the duration of the first cochlear implant experience and negatively with prior otologic pathology and nonauditory environmental influences on surgical success. Younger age, modified surgical techniques, and normal radiological findings were related to better outcomes; complications such as electrode migration and ectopic ossification were strong predictive factors for surgical failure. These findings underscore the need for tailored surgical approaches and early intervention to enhance outcomes in revision cochlear implant surgeries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Machine-Learning Parsimonious Prediction Model for Diagnostic Screening of Severe Hematological Adverse Events in Cancer Patients Treated with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors: Retrospective Observational Study by Using the Common Data Model. Unlocking the Potential of RNA Sequencing in COVID-19: Toward Accurate Diagnosis and Personalized Medicine. Evaluation of Retinal Changes in Women with Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Maternal Uterine Artery Doppler and Serum Marker in the First Trimester as Predictive Markers for Small for Gestational Age Neonates and Preeclampsia: A Pilot Study. Controversies in the Application of AI in Radiology-Is There Medico-Legal Support? Aspects from Romanian Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1