Postoperative accuracy quantification of corrective osteotomies: standardisation of Q3D-CT methodology.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02684-8
Sander J C Tabernée Heijtmeijer, Anne M L Meesters, Nico J J Verdonschot, Paul C Jutte, Job N Doornberg, Peter A J Pijpker, Joep Kraeima
{"title":"Postoperative accuracy quantification of corrective osteotomies: standardisation of Q3D-CT methodology.","authors":"Sander J C Tabernée Heijtmeijer, Anne M L Meesters, Nico J J Verdonschot, Paul C Jutte, Job N Doornberg, Peter A J Pijpker, Joep Kraeima","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02684-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Currently, no gold standard exists for 3D analysis of virtually planned surgery accuracy postoperatively. The aim of this study was to present a new, validated and standardised methodology for 3D postoperative assessment of surgical accuracy in patients undergoing 3D virtually planned and guided corrective osteotomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent 3D planned corrective osteotomy in 2021-2022 at our center with a postoperative CT were included. Postoperative surgical outcome was analysed with a postoperative CT and compared to the preoperative virtual surgical planning to determine achieved accuracy. Validation of the analysis was performed by evaluating the individual assessment of six experienced observers. A postoperative quantification was performed according to the proposed innovative methodology based on rotation axes of a virtual postoperative bone model aligned to the virtual preoperative bone model and virtual surgical planned bone model. To evaluate the intra-observer variability, one observer performed the assessment twice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantification of 13 patients according resulted in measurements with a median range (and its interquartile range) for 3D translation of: 2.43 mm (3.17), for the angle deviations: 3D rotation, 2D coronal, 2D sagittal and 2D axial were: 0.66° (1.66°), 0.74° (0.44°), 0.99° (1.27°), 2.37° (5.00°), respectively. The inter- and intraobserver reliability established with the Intraclass correlation coefficient was for all measurements excellent (> 0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed 3D CT technique provides an significant more accurate and objective method for assessment of surgical outcome of a guided corrective osteotomy. The present proposed novel methodology showed excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability with clinically acceptable absolute surgical outcome measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02684-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Currently, no gold standard exists for 3D analysis of virtually planned surgery accuracy postoperatively. The aim of this study was to present a new, validated and standardised methodology for 3D postoperative assessment of surgical accuracy in patients undergoing 3D virtually planned and guided corrective osteotomies.

Methods: All patients who underwent 3D planned corrective osteotomy in 2021-2022 at our center with a postoperative CT were included. Postoperative surgical outcome was analysed with a postoperative CT and compared to the preoperative virtual surgical planning to determine achieved accuracy. Validation of the analysis was performed by evaluating the individual assessment of six experienced observers. A postoperative quantification was performed according to the proposed innovative methodology based on rotation axes of a virtual postoperative bone model aligned to the virtual preoperative bone model and virtual surgical planned bone model. To evaluate the intra-observer variability, one observer performed the assessment twice.

Results: Quantification of 13 patients according resulted in measurements with a median range (and its interquartile range) for 3D translation of: 2.43 mm (3.17), for the angle deviations: 3D rotation, 2D coronal, 2D sagittal and 2D axial were: 0.66° (1.66°), 0.74° (0.44°), 0.99° (1.27°), 2.37° (5.00°), respectively. The inter- and intraobserver reliability established with the Intraclass correlation coefficient was for all measurements excellent (> 0.76).

Conclusion: The proposed 3D CT technique provides an significant more accurate and objective method for assessment of surgical outcome of a guided corrective osteotomy. The present proposed novel methodology showed excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability with clinically acceptable absolute surgical outcome measurements.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
矫正性截骨术后准确度量化:Q3D-CT方法学标准化。
目的:目前,对于术后虚拟计划手术精度的三维分析还没有金标准。本研究的目的是提出一种新的、有效的、标准化的方法,用于对接受3D虚拟计划和引导的矫正截骨术的患者进行手术准确性的3D术后评估。方法:纳入所有2021-2022年在我中心行3D计划矫正截骨术并术后CT检查的患者。通过术后CT分析术后手术结果,并与术前虚拟手术计划进行比较,以确定达到的准确性。通过评估六位经验丰富的观察员的个人评估来验证分析。基于虚拟术后骨模型的旋转轴与虚拟术前骨模型和虚拟手术计划骨模型对齐,根据提出的创新方法进行术后量化。为了评估观察者内部的可变性,一个观察者进行了两次评估。结果:对13例患者进行量化,三维平移的中位范围(及其四分位数范围)为2.43 mm(3.17),三维旋转、二维冠状、二维矢状和二维轴向的角度偏差分别为:0.66°(1.66°)、0.74°(0.44°)、0.99°(1.27°)、2.37°(5.00°)。用类内相关系数建立的观察者之间和观察者内部的信度对所有测量结果都很好(> 0.76)。结论:所提出的三维CT技术为指导下的矫正截骨手术效果的评估提供了一种更为准确和客观的方法。目前提出的新方法在临床可接受的绝对手术结果测量中显示出良好的观察者之间和观察者内部的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
期刊最新文献
Examining the relationship between social deprivation index and pedestrian injuries in a suburban setting: Is that the only factor? Risk factors and long-term outcomes in anterior iliac and obturator hip dislocation. Noninvasive ventilation in chest trauma-related acute respiratory failure related to chest trauma: Efficacy and risk of pneumothorax. Scintigraphy for the diagnosis of primary unrecognised fractures in multiple trauma patients - a prospective, blinded, monocentric study. Evolving fracture management: the role of helical plating in orthopaedic trauma surgery - a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1