Access to child-appropriate medicines: an exploratory survey of the use of paediatric use marketing authorisation products in the UK.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS European Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s00431-025-05987-z
Mandy Wan, Amin Houshian, Stephen Tomlin, Asia N Rashed
{"title":"Access to child-appropriate medicines: an exploratory survey of the use of paediatric use marketing authorisation products in the UK.","authors":"Mandy Wan, Amin Houshian, Stephen Tomlin, Asia N Rashed","doi":"10.1007/s00431-025-05987-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Paediatric Use Marketing Authorisation (PUMA) was introduced in the European Union to incentivise the development of off-patent medicines in children. However, there is limited data on the accessibility of PUMA products at the healthcare provider level. This study aimed to identify factors affecting real-world accessibility to PUMA products in the United Kingdom (UK). Inductive thematic analyses of the archives of the Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacy Group (NPPG) online forum were conducted. A web-based survey was also distributed to NPPG members in September 2022 regarding the availability of PUMA products in their organisations. Thematic analysis generated five themes: authorisation, availability, affordability, appropriateness and acceptability. Restricted scope of the product's marketing authorisation, market access variation, higher cost of PUMA products, product appropriateness and patient acceptability were reasons for continued off-label use and use of unlicensed products in clinical practice. Conclusion: Despite targeted legislative efforts to bring off-label uses in children into authorised use, this study provides evidence that authorisation alone does not equate to market availability, which in turn does not guarantee patient access. The study findings also suggest that cost pressure drives local procurement decisions and overshadows the long-standing problems associated with off-label use and manipulation of medicines in children. What is already known about this subject • The Paediatric Use Marketing Authorisation (PUMA) was introduced in the European Union (applied to the UK at the time) to incentivise the development of off-patient medicines exclusively for use in the paediatric population. • It is widely acknowledged that the PUMA concept has not achieved its intended goal, as evidenced by the few products authorised through this route. What this study adds • This study shows inequalities in children's access to PUMA products in the UK. • Determinants impeding patient access to child-appropriate paediatric medicines can be categorised into five dimensions: authorisation, availability, affordability, appropriateness, and acceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 2","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-05987-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Paediatric Use Marketing Authorisation (PUMA) was introduced in the European Union to incentivise the development of off-patent medicines in children. However, there is limited data on the accessibility of PUMA products at the healthcare provider level. This study aimed to identify factors affecting real-world accessibility to PUMA products in the United Kingdom (UK). Inductive thematic analyses of the archives of the Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacy Group (NPPG) online forum were conducted. A web-based survey was also distributed to NPPG members in September 2022 regarding the availability of PUMA products in their organisations. Thematic analysis generated five themes: authorisation, availability, affordability, appropriateness and acceptability. Restricted scope of the product's marketing authorisation, market access variation, higher cost of PUMA products, product appropriateness and patient acceptability were reasons for continued off-label use and use of unlicensed products in clinical practice. Conclusion: Despite targeted legislative efforts to bring off-label uses in children into authorised use, this study provides evidence that authorisation alone does not equate to market availability, which in turn does not guarantee patient access. The study findings also suggest that cost pressure drives local procurement decisions and overshadows the long-standing problems associated with off-label use and manipulation of medicines in children. What is already known about this subject • The Paediatric Use Marketing Authorisation (PUMA) was introduced in the European Union (applied to the UK at the time) to incentivise the development of off-patient medicines exclusively for use in the paediatric population. • It is widely acknowledged that the PUMA concept has not achieved its intended goal, as evidenced by the few products authorised through this route. What this study adds • This study shows inequalities in children's access to PUMA products in the UK. • Determinants impeding patient access to child-appropriate paediatric medicines can be categorised into five dimensions: authorisation, availability, affordability, appropriateness, and acceptability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
获得适合儿童的药物:英国儿科使用上市许可产品使用的探索性调查。
欧盟引入了儿科用药上市许可(PUMA),以激励儿童非专利药物的开发。然而,关于PUMA产品在医疗保健提供者层面的可及性的数据有限。本研究旨在确定影响英国PUMA产品实际可及性的因素。对新生儿和儿科药学组(NPPG)在线论坛的档案进行归纳专题分析。2022年9月,还向NPPG成员分发了一份基于网络的调查,调查内容是关于PUMA产品在其组织中的可用性。专题分析产生了五个主题:授权、可得性、可负担性、适当性和可接受性。产品上市许可范围受限、市场准入变化、PUMA产品成本较高、产品适宜性和患者可接受性是临床实践中持续超说明书使用和使用未经许可产品的原因。结论:尽管有针对性的立法努力将儿童的说明书外用药纳入授权使用,但本研究提供的证据表明,仅凭授权并不等同于市场可获得性,而市场可获得性又不能保证患者可获得性。研究结果还表明,成本压力推动了当地的采购决策,掩盖了长期存在的与儿童药物说明书外使用和操纵有关的问题。•儿科用药上市许可(PUMA)是在欧盟引入的(当时适用于英国),以激励专门用于儿科人群的非患者药物的开发。•人们普遍认为,PUMA概念并没有实现其预期目标,通过这一途径授权的少数产品就证明了这一点。•这项研究显示了英国儿童使用彪马产品的不平等。•阻碍患者获得适合儿童的儿科药物的决定因素可分为五个方面:授权、可获得性、可负担性、适当性和可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
期刊最新文献
Changes in physical activity behaviors and influencing factors among children and adolescents with heart disease after hospital discharge: a 3-month follow-up study. Shorter versus longer antibiotic therapy for children with acute otitis media: A systematic review. Mobile health applications for parents of children with Hirschsprung disease: a requirement analysis. Antibiotic prophylaxis and infection risk in pediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evaluation of sleep quality, social-emotional development, and parental stress levels of children with atopic dermatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1