{"title":"Optimizing skull base defect repair: leveraging the reused nasoseptal flap as a reliable material.","authors":"Yu-Wen Huang, Wei-Hsin Wang, Ming-Ying Lan","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09213-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The escalating number of endoscopic skull base procedures necessitates exploring additional materials to reduce postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks in revision or staged surgeries. This study evaluates the effectiveness of reused nasoseptal flaps (NSFs) in such clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on patients who previously underwent surgery involving NSFs and later had revision or secondary skull base surgeries via endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) at a tertiary medical center. Patients were divided into two groups: one with reused NSFs and the other without. Demographics, intraoperative CSF leaks, reconstruction materials, postoperative morbidity, and time to complete mucoepithelialization of the defect were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 20 patients with prior NSF usage who underwent secondary EEAs. Thirteen cases utilized reused NSFs alone or with inlay fat or fascia lata, while the remaining seven employed other materials. Pathology type disparity was significant (p = 0.031). Reused NSF demonstrated a 100% success rate in reducing CSF leaks. The average time for mucoepithelization was 61 days (SD = 34 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reusing NSF in revision or staged surgeries is a reliable technique for skull base repair, potentially reducing nasal morbidity and obviating the need for harvesting other vascular flaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09213-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The escalating number of endoscopic skull base procedures necessitates exploring additional materials to reduce postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks in revision or staged surgeries. This study evaluates the effectiveness of reused nasoseptal flaps (NSFs) in such clinical scenarios.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who previously underwent surgery involving NSFs and later had revision or secondary skull base surgeries via endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) at a tertiary medical center. Patients were divided into two groups: one with reused NSFs and the other without. Demographics, intraoperative CSF leaks, reconstruction materials, postoperative morbidity, and time to complete mucoepithelialization of the defect were analyzed.
Results: The study included 20 patients with prior NSF usage who underwent secondary EEAs. Thirteen cases utilized reused NSFs alone or with inlay fat or fascia lata, while the remaining seven employed other materials. Pathology type disparity was significant (p = 0.031). Reused NSF demonstrated a 100% success rate in reducing CSF leaks. The average time for mucoepithelization was 61 days (SD = 34 days).
Conclusions: Reusing NSF in revision or staged surgeries is a reliable technique for skull base repair, potentially reducing nasal morbidity and obviating the need for harvesting other vascular flaps.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of
European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board
Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery
"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.