Patient-specific implants combined with 3D-printed drilling guides for corrective osteotomies of multiplanar tibial and femoral shaft malunions leads to more accurate corrections.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02755-w
M G E Oldhoff, C Posada Alvarez, K Ten Duis, J N Doornberg, N Assink, F F A IJpma
{"title":"Patient-specific implants combined with 3D-printed drilling guides for corrective osteotomies of multiplanar tibial and femoral shaft malunions leads to more accurate corrections.","authors":"M G E Oldhoff, C Posada Alvarez, K Ten Duis, J N Doornberg, N Assink, F F A IJpma","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02755-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using patient-specific implants (PSI) for complex shaft corrective osteotomies in multiplanar deformities of long bones in the lower extremities. Additionally, it aimed to investigate the added value of these implants by quantifying surgical accuracy on postoperative CT, comparing their outcomes to two commonly used techniques: 3D virtual visualizations and 3D-printed surgical guides.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six tibial and femoral shaft corrective osteotomies were planned and performed on three Thiel embalmed human specimen. Depending on the specimen a different respective technique was used; 1) '3D Visualization' using 3D virtual plan preoperatively and free-hand corrective osteotomy techniques with standard manually contoured plates; 2) '3D guided' utilizing 3D surgical guides and manually contouring of conventional implant; and 3)'3D PSI' utilizing a 3D surgical guide with a patient-specific implant. Accuracy of the corrections was assessed through measurements for varus/valgus angulation, ante/recurvation, rotation and osteotomy plane error as quantified on postoperative CT-scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve corrective osteotomies were performed. For, the median difference between the surgical plan and postoperative CT assessment was 3.4°, 4.6°, and 2.2° for the '3D visualization', '3D guided', and '3D PSI' methods respectively. Regarding ante/recurvation, the differences were 3.8°, 43.8°, and 1.2°, respectively. For rotation, the differences were 11.9°, 18.7°, and 3.5°, respectively. Discrepancies between planned and executed levels of osteotomy plane were 6.2 mm, 3.2 mm, and 1.4 mm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSIs with 3D-printed drilling guides for complex multiplanar corrective osteotomies of femoral and tibial shaft malunions is feasible and achieves accurate corrections. This technique enables precise determination of the osteotomy plane, guides correction in all three planes, and ensures satisfactory implant fitting; thus accurately translating the virtual surgical plan into clinical practice. The 3D PSI method is beneficial for complex cases with significant multiplanar deformities in bone anatomy, particularly with rotational malalignment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02755-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using patient-specific implants (PSI) for complex shaft corrective osteotomies in multiplanar deformities of long bones in the lower extremities. Additionally, it aimed to investigate the added value of these implants by quantifying surgical accuracy on postoperative CT, comparing their outcomes to two commonly used techniques: 3D virtual visualizations and 3D-printed surgical guides.

Methods: Six tibial and femoral shaft corrective osteotomies were planned and performed on three Thiel embalmed human specimen. Depending on the specimen a different respective technique was used; 1) '3D Visualization' using 3D virtual plan preoperatively and free-hand corrective osteotomy techniques with standard manually contoured plates; 2) '3D guided' utilizing 3D surgical guides and manually contouring of conventional implant; and 3)'3D PSI' utilizing a 3D surgical guide with a patient-specific implant. Accuracy of the corrections was assessed through measurements for varus/valgus angulation, ante/recurvation, rotation and osteotomy plane error as quantified on postoperative CT-scans.

Results: Twelve corrective osteotomies were performed. For, the median difference between the surgical plan and postoperative CT assessment was 3.4°, 4.6°, and 2.2° for the '3D visualization', '3D guided', and '3D PSI' methods respectively. Regarding ante/recurvation, the differences were 3.8°, 43.8°, and 1.2°, respectively. For rotation, the differences were 11.9°, 18.7°, and 3.5°, respectively. Discrepancies between planned and executed levels of osteotomy plane were 6.2 mm, 3.2 mm, and 1.4 mm, respectively.

Conclusion: PSIs with 3D-printed drilling guides for complex multiplanar corrective osteotomies of femoral and tibial shaft malunions is feasible and achieves accurate corrections. This technique enables precise determination of the osteotomy plane, guides correction in all three planes, and ensures satisfactory implant fitting; thus accurately translating the virtual surgical plan into clinical practice. The 3D PSI method is beneficial for complex cases with significant multiplanar deformities in bone anatomy, particularly with rotational malalignment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对特定患者的植入物结合3d打印钻孔导向器用于胫骨和股骨干多平面畸形连的截骨矫正,可获得更准确的矫正。
目的:本研究的目的是评估使用患者特异性植入物(PSI)在下肢多平面长骨畸形的复杂骨轴矫正截骨术中的可行性。此外,它旨在通过量化术后CT上的手术准确性来研究这些植入物的附加价值,并将其结果与两种常用技术:3D虚拟可视化和3D打印手术指南进行比较。方法:对3例经Thiel防腐处理的人体标本进行6例胫骨、股骨干矫正截骨术。根据不同的标本,使用不同的技术;1)“3D可视化”:术前使用3D虚拟平面和徒手矫正截骨技术,采用标准手动轮廓钢板;2)“3D引导”利用3D手术指南和手动轮廓的传统种植体;3)“3D PSI”,利用带有患者特定植入物的3D手术指南。通过测量内翻/外翻角度、前翻/后翻、旋转和截骨平面误差来评估矫正的准确性,并在术后ct扫描上量化。结果:12例矫形截骨手术。对于“3D可视化”、“3D引导”和“3D PSI”方法,手术计划和术后CT评估的中位差分别为3.4°、4.6°和2.2°。在前/后倾角方面,差异分别为3.8°、43.8°和1.2°。对于旋转,差异分别为11.9°,18.7°和3.5°。计划截骨平面水平与实际截骨平面水平的差异分别为6.2 mm、3.2 mm和1.4 mm。结论:psi配合3d打印钻孔导具用于复杂多平面股骨胫骨畸形畸形截骨术是可行的,矫正效果准确。该技术能够精确确定截骨平面,指导所有三个平面的矫正,并确保令人满意的种植体安装;从而准确地将虚拟手术方案转化为临床实践。三维PSI方法对骨解剖中有明显多平面畸形的复杂病例是有益的,特别是旋转不对中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
期刊最新文献
Examining the relationship between social deprivation index and pedestrian injuries in a suburban setting: Is that the only factor? Risk factors and long-term outcomes in anterior iliac and obturator hip dislocation. Noninvasive ventilation in chest trauma-related acute respiratory failure related to chest trauma: Efficacy and risk of pneumothorax. Scintigraphy for the diagnosis of primary unrecognised fractures in multiple trauma patients - a prospective, blinded, monocentric study. Evolving fracture management: the role of helical plating in orthopaedic trauma surgery - a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1