High Modified 5 Factor Frailty Index is Associated With Worse PROMs and Decreased Return to Activities After 1 or 2 Level MI-TLIF.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1177/21925682251314380
Tejas Subramanian, Pratyush Shahi, Takashi Hirase, Maximilian Korsun, Joshua Zhang, Eric Kim, Cole Kwas, Austin C Kaidi, Venkat Boddapati, Junho Song, Tomoyuki Asada, Eric Mai, Chad Simon, Kasra Araghi, Troy B Amen, Avani Vaishnav, Olivia Tuma, Eric Zhao, Nishtha Singh, Myles Allen, Annika Bay, Evan Sheha, Francis C Lovecchio, James E Dowdell, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer
{"title":"High Modified 5 Factor Frailty Index is Associated With Worse PROMs and Decreased Return to Activities After 1 or 2 Level MI-TLIF.","authors":"Tejas Subramanian, Pratyush Shahi, Takashi Hirase, Maximilian Korsun, Joshua Zhang, Eric Kim, Cole Kwas, Austin C Kaidi, Venkat Boddapati, Junho Song, Tomoyuki Asada, Eric Mai, Chad Simon, Kasra Araghi, Troy B Amen, Avani Vaishnav, Olivia Tuma, Eric Zhao, Nishtha Singh, Myles Allen, Annika Bay, Evan Sheha, Francis C Lovecchio, James E Dowdell, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer","doi":"10.1177/21925682251314380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Frailty is defined as a state of minimal \"physiologic reserve.\" The modified 5 factor frailty index (mFI-5) is a recently proposed metric for assessing frailty and has been previously studied as a predictor of morbidity and mortality. However, its utility in predicting postoperative patient reported outcomes (PROMs) and return to activities remains understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing 1 or 2 level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion queried from a prospectively maintained multi-surgeon registry. Comorbidities including hypertension, congestive heart failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and functional status were utilized to calculate the mFI-5. Patients were separated into 3 cohorts, \"non-frail,\" \"moderately frail\" or \"severely frail\" based on their mFI-5. Patient outcomes were compared between the cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>392 patients were included of which 227 patients were non-frail, 134 were moderately frail, and 31 were severely frail. Frail patients had longer operative time (<i>P</i> = 0.002), greater estimated blood loss (<i>P</i> = 0.038). Despite similar preoperative PROMs, at a longer term follow up, frail patients also had worse PROM scores for ODI (<i>P</i> = 0.009), VAS-back (<i>P</i> = 0.028), and VAS-leg (<i>P</i> = 0.004). Frail patients had worse preoperative (<i>P</i> = 0.017) and postoperative (<i>P</i> < 0.001) SF-12 PCS. At 1-year, frail patients had lower rates of fusion (<i>P</i> = 0.002). Frail patients also demonstrated lower rates of returning to work (<i>P</i> = 0.018), returning to driving (<i>P</i> = 0.027), and discontinuation of narcotics (<i>P</i> = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frail patients as measured by the mFI-5 index demonstrated worse postoperative outcomes following 1 or 2 level MI-TLIF. Careful patient selection and preoperative optimization may be especially important in frail patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251314380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11765304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251314380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: Frailty is defined as a state of minimal "physiologic reserve." The modified 5 factor frailty index (mFI-5) is a recently proposed metric for assessing frailty and has been previously studied as a predictor of morbidity and mortality. However, its utility in predicting postoperative patient reported outcomes (PROMs) and return to activities remains understudied.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing 1 or 2 level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion queried from a prospectively maintained multi-surgeon registry. Comorbidities including hypertension, congestive heart failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and functional status were utilized to calculate the mFI-5. Patients were separated into 3 cohorts, "non-frail," "moderately frail" or "severely frail" based on their mFI-5. Patient outcomes were compared between the cohorts.

Results: 392 patients were included of which 227 patients were non-frail, 134 were moderately frail, and 31 were severely frail. Frail patients had longer operative time (P = 0.002), greater estimated blood loss (P = 0.038). Despite similar preoperative PROMs, at a longer term follow up, frail patients also had worse PROM scores for ODI (P = 0.009), VAS-back (P = 0.028), and VAS-leg (P = 0.004). Frail patients had worse preoperative (P = 0.017) and postoperative (P < 0.001) SF-12 PCS. At 1-year, frail patients had lower rates of fusion (P = 0.002). Frail patients also demonstrated lower rates of returning to work (P = 0.018), returning to driving (P = 0.027), and discontinuation of narcotics (P = 0.004).

Conclusion: Frail patients as measured by the mFI-5 index demonstrated worse postoperative outcomes following 1 or 2 level MI-TLIF. Careful patient selection and preoperative optimization may be especially important in frail patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Are Randomized Trials Better? Comparison of Baseline Covariate Balance of a Propensity Score-Balanced Lumbar Spine IDE Trial and Comparable RCTs. Correlation Between Facet Tropism and Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in the Cervical Spine. Frontline Voice: AO Spine Member Survey Regarding Spine Oncology Knowledge Generation and Translation Needs. Letter re: "Are Variable Screw Angle Change and Screw-To-Vertebral Body Ratio Associated with Radiographic Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?" Risk Factors Preventing Identification of the Microorganism Causing Vertebral Osteomyelitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1