High Modified 5 Factor Frailty Index is Associated With Worse PROMs and Decreased Return to Activities After 1 or 2 Level MI-TLIF.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1177/21925682251314380
Tejas Subramanian, Pratyush Shahi, Takashi Hirase, Maximilian Korsun, Joshua Zhang, Eric Kim, Cole Kwas, Austin C Kaidi, Venkat Boddapati, Junho Song, Tomoyuki Asada, Eric Mai, Chad Simon, Kasra Araghi, Troy B Amen, Avani Vaishnav, Olivia Tuma, Eric Zhao, Nishtha Singh, Myles Allen, Annika Bay, Evan Sheha, Francis C Lovecchio, James E Dowdell, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer
{"title":"High Modified 5 Factor Frailty Index is Associated With Worse PROMs and Decreased Return to Activities After 1 or 2 Level MI-TLIF.","authors":"Tejas Subramanian, Pratyush Shahi, Takashi Hirase, Maximilian Korsun, Joshua Zhang, Eric Kim, Cole Kwas, Austin C Kaidi, Venkat Boddapati, Junho Song, Tomoyuki Asada, Eric Mai, Chad Simon, Kasra Araghi, Troy B Amen, Avani Vaishnav, Olivia Tuma, Eric Zhao, Nishtha Singh, Myles Allen, Annika Bay, Evan Sheha, Francis C Lovecchio, James E Dowdell, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer","doi":"10.1177/21925682251314380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveFrailty is defined as a state of minimal \"physiologic reserve.\" The modified 5 factor frailty index (mFI-5) is a recently proposed metric for assessing frailty and has been previously studied as a predictor of morbidity and mortality. However, its utility in predicting postoperative patient reported outcomes (PROMs) and return to activities remains understudied.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing 1 or 2 level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion queried from a prospectively maintained multi-surgeon registry. Comorbidities including hypertension, congestive heart failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and functional status were utilized to calculate the mFI-5. Patients were separated into 3 cohorts, \"non-frail,\" \"moderately frail\" or \"severely frail\" based on their mFI-5. Patient outcomes were compared between the cohorts.Results392 patients were included of which 227 patients were non-frail, 134 were moderately frail, and 31 were severely frail. Frail patients had longer operative time (<i>P</i> = 0.002), greater estimated blood loss (<i>P</i> = 0.038). Despite similar preoperative PROMs, at a longer term follow up, frail patients also had worse PROM scores for ODI (<i>P</i> = 0.009), VAS-back (<i>P</i> = 0.028), and VAS-leg (<i>P</i> = 0.004). Frail patients had worse preoperative (<i>P</i> = 0.017) and postoperative (<i>P</i> < 0.001) SF-12 PCS. At 1-year, frail patients had lower rates of fusion (<i>P</i> = 0.002). Frail patients also demonstrated lower rates of returning to work (<i>P</i> = 0.018), returning to driving (<i>P</i> = 0.027), and discontinuation of narcotics (<i>P</i> = 0.004).ConclusionFrail patients as measured by the mFI-5 index demonstrated worse postoperative outcomes following 1 or 2 level MI-TLIF. Careful patient selection and preoperative optimization may be especially important in frail patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2862-2871"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11765304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251314380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveFrailty is defined as a state of minimal "physiologic reserve." The modified 5 factor frailty index (mFI-5) is a recently proposed metric for assessing frailty and has been previously studied as a predictor of morbidity and mortality. However, its utility in predicting postoperative patient reported outcomes (PROMs) and return to activities remains understudied.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing 1 or 2 level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion queried from a prospectively maintained multi-surgeon registry. Comorbidities including hypertension, congestive heart failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and functional status were utilized to calculate the mFI-5. Patients were separated into 3 cohorts, "non-frail," "moderately frail" or "severely frail" based on their mFI-5. Patient outcomes were compared between the cohorts.Results392 patients were included of which 227 patients were non-frail, 134 were moderately frail, and 31 were severely frail. Frail patients had longer operative time (P = 0.002), greater estimated blood loss (P = 0.038). Despite similar preoperative PROMs, at a longer term follow up, frail patients also had worse PROM scores for ODI (P = 0.009), VAS-back (P = 0.028), and VAS-leg (P = 0.004). Frail patients had worse preoperative (P = 0.017) and postoperative (P < 0.001) SF-12 PCS. At 1-year, frail patients had lower rates of fusion (P = 0.002). Frail patients also demonstrated lower rates of returning to work (P = 0.018), returning to driving (P = 0.027), and discontinuation of narcotics (P = 0.004).ConclusionFrail patients as measured by the mFI-5 index demonstrated worse postoperative outcomes following 1 or 2 level MI-TLIF. Careful patient selection and preoperative optimization may be especially important in frail patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高修正5因子脆弱指数与1级或2级MI-TLIF后更严重的prom和减少的活动返回相关。
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:虚弱被定义为一种最低限度的“生理储备”状态。修正后的5因素衰弱指数(mFI-5)是最近提出的一种评估衰弱的指标,此前已被研究作为发病率和死亡率的预测指标。然而,它在预测术后患者报告结果(PROMs)和恢复活动方面的效用仍未得到充分研究。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,对接受1或2节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的患者进行调查,这些患者来自前瞻性维持的多外科医生登记处。合并症包括高血压、充血性心力衰竭、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病和功能状态,用于计算mFI-5。根据mFI-5将患者分为“非虚弱”、“中度虚弱”或“严重虚弱”3组。比较两组患者的预后。结果:纳入392例患者,其中非虚弱227例,中度虚弱134例,重度虚弱31例。体弱患者手术时间较长(P = 0.002),估计失血量较大(P = 0.038)。尽管术前PROM相似,但在长期随访中,虚弱患者的ODI (P = 0.009)、VAS-back (P = 0.028)和VAS-leg (P = 0.004)的PROM评分也较差。体弱患者术前(P = 0.017)和术后(P < 0.001) SF-12 PCS较差。1年时,体弱患者的融合率较低(P = 0.002)。体弱患者恢复工作(P = 0.018)、恢复驾驶(P = 0.027)和停止使用麻醉剂(P = 0.004)的比例也较低。结论:以mFI-5指数衡量的虚弱患者在1级或2级MI-TLIF后表现出更差的术后预后。谨慎的病人选择和术前优化对身体虚弱的病人尤其重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Spinopelvic-Hip Harmony [PFA-(PI-LL)] as a Radiographic Indicator of Hip Extension Compensatory Reserve in Kyphotic Adult Spinal Deformity: A Multicenter Study. Apical Vertebral Translation as a Coronal Risk Factor for Side-Specific Hip Osteoarthritis in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis. Does Gabapentin Use Following ACDF Decrease Opioid Utilization? A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Analysis Conducted in Academic Medical Centers. The Modified 5-Item Frailty Index as a Predictor of Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery. Performance Comparison at Different Levels of Surgical Complexity. Opioid Use in Opioid Naive Patients After Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1