Trevor D Fachko, Catherine L Robey, Glenn Cannon, Leslie Konyk, Shaina Thomas, Christina Jockel, Lindsay Montoya, Janelle A Fox
{"title":"Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections with sterile, continuously closed drainage systems does not have to be costly.","authors":"Trevor D Fachko, Catherine L Robey, Glenn Cannon, Leslie Konyk, Shaina Thomas, Christina Jockel, Lindsay Montoya, Janelle A Fox","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.12.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) cause significant morbidity and financial strain in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). There is a significant incentive to reduce the rate of CAUTIs through multimodal quality improvement initiatives; however, these initiatives are often costly to implement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article examines the cost-savings associated with a novel \"two-part, two-person\" catheter insertion protocol implemented at a pediatric quaternary care center PICU which replaced costly pre-packaged, closed system urinary catheter kits with their individually packaged components, along with its impact on CAUTI rates and nursing satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The \"two-part, two-person\" insertion protocol involved two nurses placing an appropriate size indwelling catheter using an individually packaged sterile insertion kit, urine meter bag, and Foley catheter. All patients with Foley catheters placed in the PICU between April 2021 and March 2022 were included in this study. Endpoints included the cost of each insertion, CAUTI rates per 1000 Foley days, and nursing satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The \"two-part, two-person\" insertion protocol resulted in a projected 12-month cost savings of $38 521 while CAUTI rates over this period (3.8 per 1000 Foley days) did not significantly deviate from the 6 months prior to program initiation (5.65 per 1000 Foley days, p = 0.06). This protocol garnered an approval rating of 87 % by PICU nurses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Catheter expenditures can be reduced and quality standards can be maintained by eliminating costly pre-packaged, closed system urinary catheter kits in favor of their individual components. This protocol demonstrates an acceptable and sustainable intervention to improve value of care within the PICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":16747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.12.024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) cause significant morbidity and financial strain in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). There is a significant incentive to reduce the rate of CAUTIs through multimodal quality improvement initiatives; however, these initiatives are often costly to implement.
Objective: This article examines the cost-savings associated with a novel "two-part, two-person" catheter insertion protocol implemented at a pediatric quaternary care center PICU which replaced costly pre-packaged, closed system urinary catheter kits with their individually packaged components, along with its impact on CAUTI rates and nursing satisfaction.
Study design: The "two-part, two-person" insertion protocol involved two nurses placing an appropriate size indwelling catheter using an individually packaged sterile insertion kit, urine meter bag, and Foley catheter. All patients with Foley catheters placed in the PICU between April 2021 and March 2022 were included in this study. Endpoints included the cost of each insertion, CAUTI rates per 1000 Foley days, and nursing satisfaction.
Results: The "two-part, two-person" insertion protocol resulted in a projected 12-month cost savings of $38 521 while CAUTI rates over this period (3.8 per 1000 Foley days) did not significantly deviate from the 6 months prior to program initiation (5.65 per 1000 Foley days, p = 0.06). This protocol garnered an approval rating of 87 % by PICU nurses.
Conclusions: Catheter expenditures can be reduced and quality standards can be maintained by eliminating costly pre-packaged, closed system urinary catheter kits in favor of their individual components. This protocol demonstrates an acceptable and sustainable intervention to improve value of care within the PICU.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatric Urology publishes submitted research and clinical articles relating to Pediatric Urology which have been accepted after adequate peer review.
It publishes regular articles that have been submitted after invitation, that cover the curriculum of Pediatric Urology, and enable trainee surgeons to attain theoretical competence of the sub-specialty.
It publishes regular reviews of pediatric urological articles appearing in other journals.
It publishes invited review articles by recognised experts on modern or controversial aspects of the sub-specialty.
It enables any affiliated society to advertise society events or information in the journal without charge and will publish abstracts of papers to be read at society meetings.