Conservative Management of Pediatric Patients With Appendicolith Appendicitis Versus Non-appendicolith Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162175
Fatemeh Akbarpoor , Karen Blanco , Barbara Bombassaro Masiero , Rasha Rowaiaee , Victor Gonçalves Soares , Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves , Mohammed Amaan Khokar , Hussein Naji
{"title":"Conservative Management of Pediatric Patients With Appendicolith Appendicitis Versus Non-appendicolith Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Fatemeh Akbarpoor ,&nbsp;Karen Blanco ,&nbsp;Barbara Bombassaro Masiero ,&nbsp;Rasha Rowaiaee ,&nbsp;Victor Gonçalves Soares ,&nbsp;Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves ,&nbsp;Mohammed Amaan Khokar ,&nbsp;Hussein Naji","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Up to one-third of pediatric patients with acute appendicitis present with radiological evidence of appendicoliths. However, whether appendicolith presence influences prognosis under conservative management compared to non-appendicolith appendicitis remains uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases for studies comparing pediatric appendicolith and non-appendicolith appendicitis managed conservatively with antibiotics, fluids, and percutaneous drainage. Outcomes included the initial success of conservative management and recurrence rates. A random-effects model was applied for all analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve observational studies with 814 patients were included. Of these, 282 (35 %) had appendicoliths, and 532 (65 %) did not. The average age ranged from 2 to 11 years, with follow-up between 1 week and 2 years. Overall, there is no significant difference in the initial success of conservative management was observed between the two groups (OR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.28–1.78; p = 0.46). Subgroup analysis revealed lower success rates for appendicolith-associated simple appendicitis (OR 0.42; 95 % CI 0.21–0.84; p = 0.01), but no difference in complicated appendicitis (OR 1.01; 95 % CI 0.24–4.31; p = 0.99). Recurrence rates were significantly higher in appendicolith appendicitis across both groups (OR 2.75; 95 % CI 1.05–7.20; p = 0.04).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Appendicolith presence reduces conservative management success in simple appendicitis, supporting early appendectomy. Although appendicoliths do not predict treatment failure in complicated appendicitis, interval appendectomy may be advisable due to the higher recurrence risk in both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Type of Study</h3><div>Meta-analysis and systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level I.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 4","pages":"Article 162175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002234682500020X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Up to one-third of pediatric patients with acute appendicitis present with radiological evidence of appendicoliths. However, whether appendicolith presence influences prognosis under conservative management compared to non-appendicolith appendicitis remains uncertain.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases for studies comparing pediatric appendicolith and non-appendicolith appendicitis managed conservatively with antibiotics, fluids, and percutaneous drainage. Outcomes included the initial success of conservative management and recurrence rates. A random-effects model was applied for all analyses.

Results

Twelve observational studies with 814 patients were included. Of these, 282 (35 %) had appendicoliths, and 532 (65 %) did not. The average age ranged from 2 to 11 years, with follow-up between 1 week and 2 years. Overall, there is no significant difference in the initial success of conservative management was observed between the two groups (OR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.28–1.78; p = 0.46). Subgroup analysis revealed lower success rates for appendicolith-associated simple appendicitis (OR 0.42; 95 % CI 0.21–0.84; p = 0.01), but no difference in complicated appendicitis (OR 1.01; 95 % CI 0.24–4.31; p = 0.99). Recurrence rates were significantly higher in appendicolith appendicitis across both groups (OR 2.75; 95 % CI 1.05–7.20; p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Appendicolith presence reduces conservative management success in simple appendicitis, supporting early appendectomy. Although appendicoliths do not predict treatment failure in complicated appendicitis, interval appendectomy may be advisable due to the higher recurrence risk in both groups.

Type of Study

Meta-analysis and systematic review.

Level of Evidence

Level I.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿阑尾炎与非阑尾炎的保守治疗:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
多达三分之一的小儿急性阑尾炎患者表现为阑尾结石的影像学证据。然而,与非阑尾结石阑尾炎相比,阑尾结石的存在是否影响保守治疗下的预后仍不确定。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Cochrane、Embase和Web of Science数据库,以比较使用抗生素、液体和经皮引流保守治疗的小儿阑尾炎和非阑尾炎的研究。结果包括保守治疗的初步成功和复发率。所有分析均采用随机效应模型。结果:纳入12项观察性研究,共814例患者。其中282例(35%)有阑尾结石,532例(65%)没有。平均年龄2 ~ 11岁,随访1周~ 2年。总体而言,两组患者保守治疗的初始成功率无显著差异(OR 0.70;95% ci 0.28-1.78;p = 0.46)。亚组分析显示阑尾结石相关性单纯性阑尾炎的成功率较低(OR 0.42;95% ci 0.21-0.84;p = 0.01),但在复杂性阑尾炎中差异无统计学意义(OR 1.01;95% ci 0.24-4.31;p = 0.99)。两组阑尾结肠炎复发率均显著高于对照组(OR 2.75;95% ci 1.05-7.20;p = 0.04)。结论:阑尾结石的存在降低了单纯性阑尾炎的保守治疗成功率,支持早期阑尾切除术。虽然阑尾结石不能预测复杂阑尾炎治疗失败,但由于两组患者复发风险较高,间隔期阑尾切除术可能是可取的。研究类型:荟萃分析和系统评价。证据等级:一级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
期刊最新文献
State legislation and surgical demand: Operative needs of Texas infants after early abortion ban Progression of esophageal atresia associated Barrett’s esophagus in adulthood – Is endoscopic surveillance worth it? Is there any difference between surgical and endoscopic interventions related to the outcome of recurrent tracheoesophageal fistulas? A systematic review Post-extraction management of esophageal button battery injuries in children: A scoping review of imaging, ICU admission, and NPO practices Definitive ileostomy in total colonic aganglionosis: results and considerations from a single-center experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1