Predicting a strongly positive fluid balance in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: A multicentre, international study

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of critical care Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155016
Kyle C. White , Rinaldo Bellomo , Kevin B. Laupland , Michelle L. Gatton , Marlies Ostermann , Philipa McIlroy , Stephen Luke , Peter Garrett , Alexis Tabah , Stephen Whebell , Prashanti Marella , James McCullough , Kiran Shekar , Antony G. Attokaran , Aashish Kumar , Jason Meyer , Barnaby Sanderson , Ary Serpa-Neto
{"title":"Predicting a strongly positive fluid balance in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: A multicentre, international study","authors":"Kyle C. White ,&nbsp;Rinaldo Bellomo ,&nbsp;Kevin B. Laupland ,&nbsp;Michelle L. Gatton ,&nbsp;Marlies Ostermann ,&nbsp;Philipa McIlroy ,&nbsp;Stephen Luke ,&nbsp;Peter Garrett ,&nbsp;Alexis Tabah ,&nbsp;Stephen Whebell ,&nbsp;Prashanti Marella ,&nbsp;James McCullough ,&nbsp;Kiran Shekar ,&nbsp;Antony G. Attokaran ,&nbsp;Aashish Kumar ,&nbsp;Jason Meyer ,&nbsp;Barnaby Sanderson ,&nbsp;Ary Serpa-Neto","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), a fluid balance (FB) &gt; 2 L at 72 h after AKI diagnosis is associated with adverse outcomes. Identification of patients at high-risk for such fluid accumulation may help prevent it.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used Australian electronic medical record (EMR)-based clinical data to develop the “AKI-FB risk score”, validated it in a British cohort and used it to predict a positive FB &gt;2 L at 72 h after AKI diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We developed the AKI-FB score in 32,030 patients with a median age of 63 years and a median APACHE 2 score of 16. We validated it in 4465 patients, with significant differences in admission diagnoses and interventions. The key score variables were admission after trauma, sepsis or septic shock, and, on the day of AKI diagnosis, highest creatinine, daily cumulative FB, mechanical ventilation, noradrenaline use, noradrenaline equivalent dose &gt;0.07 μg/kg/min, lactate ≥2 mmol/L, transfusion, and nutritional support. A score threshold of 32 had a sensitivity of 75 % and a specificity of 72 % for predicting a &gt; 2 L positive FB with an AUC-ROC of 0.805; 95 % CI 0.799 to 0.810. External validation demonstrated an AUC of 0.761 (95 % CI 0.746 to 0.775).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We developed and validated the “AKI-FB risk score” to predict patients who developed a positive FB &gt;2 L within 72 h of AKI diagnosis. This prediction score was robust and facilitated the identification of high-risk AKI patients who could be the tarted for preventive measures and be included in future clinical trials of FB management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 155016"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125000036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), a fluid balance (FB) > 2 L at 72 h after AKI diagnosis is associated with adverse outcomes. Identification of patients at high-risk for such fluid accumulation may help prevent it.

Methods

We used Australian electronic medical record (EMR)-based clinical data to develop the “AKI-FB risk score”, validated it in a British cohort and used it to predict a positive FB >2 L at 72 h after AKI diagnosis.

Results

We developed the AKI-FB score in 32,030 patients with a median age of 63 years and a median APACHE 2 score of 16. We validated it in 4465 patients, with significant differences in admission diagnoses and interventions. The key score variables were admission after trauma, sepsis or septic shock, and, on the day of AKI diagnosis, highest creatinine, daily cumulative FB, mechanical ventilation, noradrenaline use, noradrenaline equivalent dose >0.07 μg/kg/min, lactate ≥2 mmol/L, transfusion, and nutritional support. A score threshold of 32 had a sensitivity of 75 % and a specificity of 72 % for predicting a > 2 L positive FB with an AUC-ROC of 0.805; 95 % CI 0.799 to 0.810. External validation demonstrated an AUC of 0.761 (95 % CI 0.746 to 0.775).

Conclusion

We developed and validated the “AKI-FB risk score” to predict patients who developed a positive FB >2 L within 72 h of AKI diagnosis. This prediction score was robust and facilitated the identification of high-risk AKI patients who could be the tarted for preventive measures and be included in future clinical trials of FB management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测急性肾损伤危重患者的强阳性体液平衡:一项多中心的国际研究
背景:在急性肾损伤(AKI)危重患者中,AKI诊断后72小时的体液平衡(FB) bbb20 L与不良结局相关。识别这种液体积聚的高危患者可能有助于预防它。方法:我们使用基于澳大利亚电子病历(EMR)的临床数据制定了“AKI-FB风险评分”,并在英国队列中进行了验证,并使用该评分来预测AKI诊断后72小时的FB bbb2l阳性。结果:我们在32,030例患者中开发了AKI-FB评分,中位年龄为63岁,中位APACHE 2评分为16。我们在4465例患者中进行了验证,在入院诊断和干预方面存在显著差异。关键评分变量为创伤后入院、脓毒症或脓毒性休克、AKI诊断当日最高肌酐、每日累积FB、机械通气、去甲肾上腺素使用、去甲肾上腺素当量剂量>0.07 μg/kg/min、乳酸≥2 mmol/L、输血和营养支持。评分阈值为32,预测bbbb2l阳性FB的敏感性为75%,特异性为72%,AUC-ROC为0.805;95% CI 0.799 - 0.810。外部验证显示AUC为0.761 (95% CI 0.746至0.775)。结论:我们开发并验证了“AKI-FB风险评分”,以预测在AKI诊断后72小时内FB bbbb2 L阳性的患者。该预测评分是稳健的,有助于识别高危AKI患者,这些患者可以作为预防措施的起点,并被纳入未来FB管理的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
期刊最新文献
Early hemodynamic phenotyping in sepsis using transthoracic echocardiography: A proof-of-concept study in a north African ICU Green intensive care in an upper-middle-income country: A national survey of awareness, practices and barriers among ICU physicians in Turkey The “gray zone” of intensive care: ICU admission beyond a binary decision Discontinuation of continuous kidney replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury: A pilot study Major publications in the critical care pharmacotherapy literature: 2025
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1