Machine-learning-assisted Preoperative Prediction of Pediatric Appendicitis Severity

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162151
Aylin Erman , Julia Ferreira , Waseem Abu Ashour , Elena Guadagno , Etienne St-Louis , Sherif Emil , Jackie Cheung , Dan Poenaru
{"title":"Machine-learning-assisted Preoperative Prediction of Pediatric Appendicitis Severity","authors":"Aylin Erman ,&nbsp;Julia Ferreira ,&nbsp;Waseem Abu Ashour ,&nbsp;Elena Guadagno ,&nbsp;Etienne St-Louis ,&nbsp;Sherif Emil ,&nbsp;Jackie Cheung ,&nbsp;Dan Poenaru","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study evaluates the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms for improving the preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children, focusing on the accurate prediction of the severity of disease.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An anonymized clinical and operative dataset was retrieved from the medical records of children undergoing emergency appendectomy between 2014 and 2021. We developed an ML pipeline that pre-processed the dataset and developed algorithms to predict 5 appendicitis grades (1 - non-perforated, 2 - localized perforation, 3 - abscess, 4 - generalized peritonitis, and 5 - generalized peritonitis with abscess). Imputation strategies were used for missing values and upsampling techniques for infrequent classes. Standard classifier models were tested. The best combination of imputation strategy, class balancing technique and classification model was chosen based on validation performance. Model explainability was verified by a pediatric surgeon. Our model's performance was compared to another pediatric appendicitis severity prediction tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study used a retrospective cohort including 1980 patients (60.6 % males, average age 10.7 years). Grade of appendicitis in the cohort was as follows: grade 1–70 %; grade 2–8 %; grade 3–7 %; grade 4–7 %; grade 5–8 %. Every combination of 6 imputation strategies, 7 class-balancing techniques, and 5 classification models was tested. The best-performing combined ML pipeline distinguished non-perforated from perforated appendicitis with 82.8 ± 0.2 % NPV and 56.4 ± 0.4 % PPV, and differentiated between severity grades with 70.1 ± 0.2 % accuracy and 0.77 ± 0.00 AUROC. The other pediatric appendicitis severity prediction tool gave an accuracy of 71.4 %, AUROC of 0.54 and NPV/PPV of 71.8/64.7.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Prediction of appendiceal perforation outperforms prediction of the continuum of appendicitis grades. The variables our models primarily rely on to make predictions are consistent with clinical experience and the literature, suggesting that the ML models uncovered useful patterns in the dataset. Our model outperforms the other pediatric appendicitis prediction tools.</div><div>The ML model developed for grade prediction is the first of this type, offering a novel approach for assessing appendicitis severity in children preoperatively. Following external validation and silent clinical testing, this ML model has the potential to enable personalized severity-based treatment of pediatric appendicitis and optimize resource allocation for its management.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>3.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 6","pages":"Article 162151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346824011138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluates the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms for improving the preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children, focusing on the accurate prediction of the severity of disease.

Methods

An anonymized clinical and operative dataset was retrieved from the medical records of children undergoing emergency appendectomy between 2014 and 2021. We developed an ML pipeline that pre-processed the dataset and developed algorithms to predict 5 appendicitis grades (1 - non-perforated, 2 - localized perforation, 3 - abscess, 4 - generalized peritonitis, and 5 - generalized peritonitis with abscess). Imputation strategies were used for missing values and upsampling techniques for infrequent classes. Standard classifier models were tested. The best combination of imputation strategy, class balancing technique and classification model was chosen based on validation performance. Model explainability was verified by a pediatric surgeon. Our model's performance was compared to another pediatric appendicitis severity prediction tool.

Results

The study used a retrospective cohort including 1980 patients (60.6 % males, average age 10.7 years). Grade of appendicitis in the cohort was as follows: grade 1–70 %; grade 2–8 %; grade 3–7 %; grade 4–7 %; grade 5–8 %. Every combination of 6 imputation strategies, 7 class-balancing techniques, and 5 classification models was tested. The best-performing combined ML pipeline distinguished non-perforated from perforated appendicitis with 82.8 ± 0.2 % NPV and 56.4 ± 0.4 % PPV, and differentiated between severity grades with 70.1 ± 0.2 % accuracy and 0.77 ± 0.00 AUROC. The other pediatric appendicitis severity prediction tool gave an accuracy of 71.4 %, AUROC of 0.54 and NPV/PPV of 71.8/64.7.

Conclusion

Prediction of appendiceal perforation outperforms prediction of the continuum of appendicitis grades. The variables our models primarily rely on to make predictions are consistent with clinical experience and the literature, suggesting that the ML models uncovered useful patterns in the dataset. Our model outperforms the other pediatric appendicitis prediction tools.
The ML model developed for grade prediction is the first of this type, offering a novel approach for assessing appendicitis severity in children preoperatively. Following external validation and silent clinical testing, this ML model has the potential to enable personalized severity-based treatment of pediatric appendicitis and optimize resource allocation for its management.

Level of evidence

3.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习辅助的小儿阑尾炎严重程度术前预测。
目的:本研究评估机器学习(ML)算法在提高儿童急性阑尾炎术前诊断中的有效性,重点是准确预测疾病严重程度。方法:从2014年至2021年接受急诊阑尾切除术的儿童病历中检索匿名的临床和手术数据集。我们开发了一个ML管道,对数据集进行预处理,并开发了算法来预测5种阑尾炎等级(1 -非穿孔,2 -局部穿孔,3 -脓肿,4 -广泛性腹膜炎,5 -广泛性腹膜炎伴脓肿)。对缺失值采用插补策略,对不频繁的类采用上采样技术。对标准分类器模型进行了测试。基于验证性能选择了最优的归算策略、类平衡技术和分类模型的组合。模型的可解释性由一名儿科外科医生验证。我们的模型的性能与另一种小儿阑尾炎严重程度预测工具进行了比较。结果:本研究采用回顾性队列,包括1980例患者(60.6%为男性,平均年龄10.7岁)。队列中阑尾炎的级别如下:1- 70%;2- 8%;3- 7%;4- 7%;5- 8%。对6种归算策略、7种类平衡技术和5种分类模型的每种组合进行了测试。表现最好的联合ML管道区分非穿孔和穿孔阑尾炎的准确率为82.8±0.2% NPV和56.4±0.4% PPV,区分严重程度的准确率为70.1±0.2%和0.77±0.00 AUROC。另一种小儿阑尾炎严重程度预测工具的准确率为71.4%,AUROC为0.54,NPV/PPV为71.8/64.7。结论:预测阑尾穿孔优于预测阑尾炎分级连续性。我们的模型主要依赖于进行预测的变量与临床经验和文献一致,这表明ML模型揭示了数据集中有用的模式。我们的模型优于其他儿科阑尾炎预测工具。用于分级预测的ML模型是这种类型的第一个,为术前评估儿童阑尾炎严重程度提供了一种新的方法。经过外部验证和沉默的临床测试,该ML模型有可能实现基于严重程度的个性化儿科阑尾炎治疗,并优化其管理的资源分配。证据等级:3;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
期刊最新文献
Patient reported outcomes after subtotal colectomy in pediatric therapy-resistant constipation: A combined retrospective and cross-sectional study Esophageal atresia and parental psychological distress in the neonatal period Interpretable deep learning model for pediatric strangulated small bowel obstruction on CT: A multicenter study Clinical characteristics and mortality prediction in neonatal gastric perforation: Insights from a regional multicenter retrospective cohort study Trap-door approach for complex pediatric thoracic inlet tumors with vascular encasement: Safety and resection outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1