Use of the Adaptive Behaviour Dementia Questionnaire in a Down Syndrome Specialty Clinic.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of integrative neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.31083/JIN25713
Nicolas M Oreskovic, Ayesha Harisinghani, Caroline Bregman, Clorinda Cottrell, Margaret Pulsifer, Brian G Skotko, Amy Torres, Alexa Gozdiff Spognardi, Stephanie L Santoro
{"title":"Use of the Adaptive Behaviour Dementia Questionnaire in a Down Syndrome Specialty Clinic.","authors":"Nicolas M Oreskovic, Ayesha Harisinghani, Caroline Bregman, Clorinda Cottrell, Margaret Pulsifer, Brian G Skotko, Amy Torres, Alexa Gozdiff Spognardi, Stephanie L Santoro","doi":"10.31083/JIN25713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the use of a dementia screening tool in our clinic cohort of adults with Down syndrome.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective chart review of patients with Down syndrome was conducted to follow the use of the Adaptive Behaviour Dementia Questionnaire (ABDQ) in a dementia screening protocol. The ABDQ results for patients aged 40 years and older at a Down syndrome specialty clinic program were assessed. Based on caregiver feedback, an ABDQ with modified instructions was piloted and the impact assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As part of our clinic's initiative to implement a new clinical protocol to screen for dementia, the ABDQ was completed by 47 caregivers of adults with Down syndrome, aged 39 years and above, from December, 2021 to April, 2023. Based on clinical impressions at the same timepoint, the ABDQ had a sensitivity of 0%, specificity of 97.4%, positive predictive value of 0%, and negative predictive value of 80.4%. Nine patients were deemed to have mild cognitive impairment and/or dementia by clinical impressions, but they did <i>not</i> identify as positive on the ABDQ. The Down syndrome clinic team modified the ABDQ in an effort to provide clearer language and increased sensitivity. The modified ABDQ showed a sensitivity of 0%, specificity of 93.8%, positive predictive value of 0% and negative predictive value of 75%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neither the original ABDQ nor a modified version adequately identified patients with cognitive impairment and/or dementia within the Down syndrome clinical program. The inability to replicate findings from the initial ABDQ validation may be due to differences in setting and format.</p>","PeriodicalId":16160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of integrative neuroscience","volume":"24 1","pages":"25713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of integrative neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/JIN25713","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the use of a dementia screening tool in our clinic cohort of adults with Down syndrome.

Study design: A retrospective chart review of patients with Down syndrome was conducted to follow the use of the Adaptive Behaviour Dementia Questionnaire (ABDQ) in a dementia screening protocol. The ABDQ results for patients aged 40 years and older at a Down syndrome specialty clinic program were assessed. Based on caregiver feedback, an ABDQ with modified instructions was piloted and the impact assessed.

Results: As part of our clinic's initiative to implement a new clinical protocol to screen for dementia, the ABDQ was completed by 47 caregivers of adults with Down syndrome, aged 39 years and above, from December, 2021 to April, 2023. Based on clinical impressions at the same timepoint, the ABDQ had a sensitivity of 0%, specificity of 97.4%, positive predictive value of 0%, and negative predictive value of 80.4%. Nine patients were deemed to have mild cognitive impairment and/or dementia by clinical impressions, but they did not identify as positive on the ABDQ. The Down syndrome clinic team modified the ABDQ in an effort to provide clearer language and increased sensitivity. The modified ABDQ showed a sensitivity of 0%, specificity of 93.8%, positive predictive value of 0% and negative predictive value of 75%.

Conclusion: Neither the original ABDQ nor a modified version adequately identified patients with cognitive impairment and/or dementia within the Down syndrome clinical program. The inability to replicate findings from the initial ABDQ validation may be due to differences in setting and format.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适应性行为痴呆问卷在唐氏综合征专科诊所的使用。
目的:研究痴呆筛查工具在唐氏综合征成人临床队列中的应用。研究设计:采用适应性行为痴呆问卷(ABDQ)作为痴呆筛查方案,对唐氏综合征患者进行回顾性图表回顾。对40岁及以上唐氏综合征专科临床项目患者的ABDQ结果进行评估。根据护理人员的反馈,对ABDQ进行了试点,并对其影响进行了评估。结果:作为我们诊所实施新的痴呆症筛查临床方案的一部分,从2021年12月到2023年4月,47名患有唐氏综合征的成人护理人员完成了ABDQ,年龄在39岁及以上。基于同一时间点的临床印象,ABDQ敏感性为0%,特异性为97.4%,阳性预测值为0%,阴性预测值为80.4%。根据临床印象,9名患者被认为有轻度认知障碍和/或痴呆,但他们在ABDQ上没有确定为阳性。唐氏综合症临床小组修改了ABDQ,以提供更清晰的语言和更高的灵敏度。改进的ABDQ敏感性为0%,特异性为93.8%,阳性预测值为0%,阴性预测值为75%。结论:在唐氏综合征临床项目中,原始的ABDQ和修改后的ABDQ都不能充分识别认知障碍和/或痴呆患者。无法复制最初ABDQ验证的结果可能是由于设置和格式的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
173
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: JIN is an international peer-reviewed, open access journal. JIN publishes leading-edge research at the interface of theoretical and experimental neuroscience, focusing across hierarchical levels of brain organization to better understand how diverse functions are integrated. We encourage submissions from scientists of all specialties that relate to brain functioning.
期刊最新文献
Early and Prolonged Cortical Electrical Stimulation Preserves Motor Functions and Nigrostriatal Dopaminergic Neurons in the MitoPark Model of Parkinson's Disease. Analysis of Electroencephalogram Characteristics in Patients with Varying Degrees of Disorders of Consciousness. Miro1 Mediates the Neuroprotective Effects of Electroacupuncture Against Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Mice. Distinguishing Interictal Neuromagnetic Activity in Migraine With and Without Aura: A Resting-State Magnetoencephalography Study. Cerebellar iTBS Modulates Cortical Network Properties: An fNIRS Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1