{"title":"Surface Electromyographic Activities of Submental and Infrahyoid Muscles: Comparisons Based on Residue, Penetration and Aspiration.","authors":"Hakan Gölaç, Güzide Atalık, Adnan Gülaçtı, Süleyman Cebeci, Ebru Şansal, Banu Tijen Ceylan, Bülent Gündüz, Metin Yılmaz","doi":"10.1111/joor.13934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surface electromyography (sEMG) has been used in a wide range of studies conducted in the field of dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The main aim of this case-control study is to obtain how submental and infrahyoid sEMG signals differ based on residue, penetration and aspiration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 participants (50 patients with suspected dysphagia and 50 healthy controls) were enrolled in the present study. Participants with suspected dysphagia underwent a detailed fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) to observe the efficiency and safety of swallowing using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS) and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), respectively. Afterward, sEMG parameters, including submental muscle activity duration (SMM-AD), infrahyoid muscle activity duration (IM-AD), amplitude of submental muscles (A-SMM) and amplitude of infrahyoid muscles (A-IM) were obtained during three consecutive dry swallows from all study cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significantly higher SMM-AD values in patients with a YPRSRS score of 1-2 and a YPRSRS score of 3-5 for residue in vallecula compared to the controls (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Both subgroups of patients with a YPRSRS score of 1-2 and a YPRSRS score of 3-5 for residue in piriforms showed significantly higher SMM-AD values compared to the controls (p < 0.001 and p = 0.048, respectively). The same prolongation of SMM-AD was also evident for the patients with airway invasion (penetration or aspiration) compared to the controls (p = 0.042 and p < 0.001, respectively). The other measured sEMG parameters (IM-AD, A-SMM and A-IM) did not differ significantly based on FEES outcomes (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since the availability of instrumental swallowing assessment methods in clinical practice is quite challenging, specific sEMG parameters may be useful to predict possible residue, penetration, or aspiration events in patients with dysphagia. SMM-AD can be considered as a first-line assessment parameter for possible residue, penetration, and aspiration events before referring patients for further instrumental methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13934","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Surface electromyography (sEMG) has been used in a wide range of studies conducted in the field of dysphagia.
Objectives: The main aim of this case-control study is to obtain how submental and infrahyoid sEMG signals differ based on residue, penetration and aspiration.
Methods: A total of 100 participants (50 patients with suspected dysphagia and 50 healthy controls) were enrolled in the present study. Participants with suspected dysphagia underwent a detailed fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) to observe the efficiency and safety of swallowing using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS) and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), respectively. Afterward, sEMG parameters, including submental muscle activity duration (SMM-AD), infrahyoid muscle activity duration (IM-AD), amplitude of submental muscles (A-SMM) and amplitude of infrahyoid muscles (A-IM) were obtained during three consecutive dry swallows from all study cohorts.
Results: There were significantly higher SMM-AD values in patients with a YPRSRS score of 1-2 and a YPRSRS score of 3-5 for residue in vallecula compared to the controls (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Both subgroups of patients with a YPRSRS score of 1-2 and a YPRSRS score of 3-5 for residue in piriforms showed significantly higher SMM-AD values compared to the controls (p < 0.001 and p = 0.048, respectively). The same prolongation of SMM-AD was also evident for the patients with airway invasion (penetration or aspiration) compared to the controls (p = 0.042 and p < 0.001, respectively). The other measured sEMG parameters (IM-AD, A-SMM and A-IM) did not differ significantly based on FEES outcomes (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Since the availability of instrumental swallowing assessment methods in clinical practice is quite challenging, specific sEMG parameters may be useful to predict possible residue, penetration, or aspiration events in patients with dysphagia. SMM-AD can be considered as a first-line assessment parameter for possible residue, penetration, and aspiration events before referring patients for further instrumental methods.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.