Comparative Analysis of the Enzymatic, Coagulant, and Neuromuscular Activities of Two Variants of Crotalus durissus ruruima Venom and Antivenom Efficacy.

IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Pharmaceuticals Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.3390/ph18010054
Poliana J Demico, Isabele N Oliveira, Vitória S Proença-Hirata, Samuel R Dias, Hugo A Ghirotti, Elisangela O Silva, Inês C Giometti, Francis L Pacagnelli, Kristian A Torres-Bonilla, Stephen Hyslop, Nathália C Galizio, Karen de Morais-Zani, Manuela B Pucca, Anderson M Rocha, Jéssica B Maciel, Marco A Sartim, Wuelton M Monteiro, Rafael S Floriano
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Enzymatic, Coagulant, and Neuromuscular Activities of Two Variants of <i>Crotalus durissus ruruima</i> Venom and Antivenom Efficacy.","authors":"Poliana J Demico, Isabele N Oliveira, Vitória S Proença-Hirata, Samuel R Dias, Hugo A Ghirotti, Elisangela O Silva, Inês C Giometti, Francis L Pacagnelli, Kristian A Torres-Bonilla, Stephen Hyslop, Nathália C Galizio, Karen de Morais-Zani, Manuela B Pucca, Anderson M Rocha, Jéssica B Maciel, Marco A Sartim, Wuelton M Monteiro, Rafael S Floriano","doi":"10.3390/ph18010054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> We compared the enzymatic, coagulant, and neuromuscular activities of two variants (yellow-CDRy and white-CDRw) of <i>Crotalus durissus ruruima</i> venom with a sample of <i>C. d. terrificus</i> (CDT) venom and examined their neutralization by antivenom against CDT venom. <b>Methods:</b> The venoms were screened for enzymatic and coagulant activities using standard assays, and electrophoretic profiles were compared by SDS-PAGE. Neutralization was assessed by preincubating venoms with crotalic antivenom and assaying the residual activity. <b>Results:</b> SDS-PAGE showed that the venoms had similar electrophoretic profiles, with the main bands being phospholipase A<sub>2</sub> (PLA<sub>2</sub>), serine proteinases, L-amino acid oxidase (LAAO), and phosphodiesterase. CDRy venom had the highest proteolytic and LAAO activities, CDRw venom had greater PLA<sub>2</sub> and esterolytic activities at the highest quantity tested, and CDT had greater PLA<sub>2</sub> activity than CDRy. CDRw and CDT venoms had similar proteolytic and LAAO activities, and CDRy and CDT venoms had comparable esterolytic activity. None of the venoms altered the prothrombin time (PT), but all of them decreased the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPPT); this activity was neutralized by antivenom. The minimum coagulant dose potency was CDRw >> CDRy > CDT. All venoms had thrombin-like activity that was attenuated by antivenom. CDRy and CDRw venoms showed α-fibrinogenolytic activity. All venoms partially cleaved the β-chain. CDRy and CDT venoms caused neuromuscular facilitation (enhanced muscle contractions) followed by complete blockade, whereas CDRw venom caused only blockade. Antivenom neutralized the neuromuscular activity to varying degrees. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings indicate that while CDR and CDT venoms share similarities, they also differ in some enzymatic and biological activities and in neutralization by antivenom. Some of these differences could influence the clinical manifestations of envenomation by <i>C. d. ruruima</i> and their neutralization by the currently used therapeutic antivenom.</p>","PeriodicalId":20198,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11768973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18010054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We compared the enzymatic, coagulant, and neuromuscular activities of two variants (yellow-CDRy and white-CDRw) of Crotalus durissus ruruima venom with a sample of C. d. terrificus (CDT) venom and examined their neutralization by antivenom against CDT venom. Methods: The venoms were screened for enzymatic and coagulant activities using standard assays, and electrophoretic profiles were compared by SDS-PAGE. Neutralization was assessed by preincubating venoms with crotalic antivenom and assaying the residual activity. Results: SDS-PAGE showed that the venoms had similar electrophoretic profiles, with the main bands being phospholipase A2 (PLA2), serine proteinases, L-amino acid oxidase (LAAO), and phosphodiesterase. CDRy venom had the highest proteolytic and LAAO activities, CDRw venom had greater PLA2 and esterolytic activities at the highest quantity tested, and CDT had greater PLA2 activity than CDRy. CDRw and CDT venoms had similar proteolytic and LAAO activities, and CDRy and CDT venoms had comparable esterolytic activity. None of the venoms altered the prothrombin time (PT), but all of them decreased the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPPT); this activity was neutralized by antivenom. The minimum coagulant dose potency was CDRw >> CDRy > CDT. All venoms had thrombin-like activity that was attenuated by antivenom. CDRy and CDRw venoms showed α-fibrinogenolytic activity. All venoms partially cleaved the β-chain. CDRy and CDT venoms caused neuromuscular facilitation (enhanced muscle contractions) followed by complete blockade, whereas CDRw venom caused only blockade. Antivenom neutralized the neuromuscular activity to varying degrees. Conclusions: These findings indicate that while CDR and CDT venoms share similarities, they also differ in some enzymatic and biological activities and in neutralization by antivenom. Some of these differences could influence the clinical manifestations of envenomation by C. d. ruruima and their neutralization by the currently used therapeutic antivenom.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种不同毒豆的酶、凝血剂、神经肌肉活性及抗蛇毒功效比较分析。
背景:我们比较了两种变异(黄色- cdry和白色- cdrw)的Crotalus durissus ruruima毒液和c.d. terrificus (CDT)毒液的酶、凝血剂和神经肌肉活性,并检测了抗蛇毒血清对CDT毒液的中和作用。方法:采用标准方法筛选毒液的酶促和凝固剂活性,并用SDS-PAGE比较其电泳谱。中和是通过用蛇毒抗毒液预孵育毒液并测定残留活性来评估的。结果:SDS-PAGE显示,两种毒液的电泳图谱相似,主要条带为磷脂酶A2 (PLA2)、丝氨酸蛋白酶、l -氨基酸氧化酶(LAAO)和磷酸二酯酶。CDRy毒液的蛋白水解和LAAO活性最高,CDRw毒液的PLA2和酯水解活性最高,CDT毒液的PLA2活性高于CDRy。CDRw和CDT毒液具有相似的蛋白水解和LAAO活性,CDRy和CDT毒液具有相似的酯水解活性。所有毒液均未改变凝血酶原时间(PT),但均降低了活化的部分凝血活素时间(aPPT);该活性被抗蛇毒血清中和。最小凝血剂量效价为CDRw b> CDRy b> CDT。所有毒液都有类似凝血酶的活性,抗蛇毒血清会减弱这种活性。CDRy和CDRw毒液具有α-纤维蛋白原溶解活性。所有的毒液都部分切断了β链。CDRy和CDT毒液引起神经肌肉促进(增强肌肉收缩),然后完全阻断,而CDRw毒液只引起阻断。抗蛇毒血清在不同程度上中和了神经肌肉活动。结论:这些发现表明,CDR和CDT毒液虽然有相似之处,但它们在一些酶和生物活性以及抗蛇毒血清中和作用方面也存在差异。其中的一些差异可能会影响到蛇毒中毒的临床表现以及目前使用的抗蛇毒血清对其的中和作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceuticals
Pharmaceuticals Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
1332
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceuticals (ISSN 1424-8247) is an international scientific journal of medicinal chemistry and related drug sciences.Our aim is to publish updated reviews as well as research articles with comprehensive theoretical and experimental details. Short communications are also accepted; therefore, there is no restriction on the maximum length of the papers.
期刊最新文献
Preliminary Data Regarding the Potential of Oxytocin to Modulate Aggressive Behaviour in a VPA-Based Animal Model of Autism Spectrum Disorder. A Comparative Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effects of Adenosine Triphosphate, Coenzyme Q10, Pyridoxine, and Thiamine Pyrophosphate in a Linezolid-Induced Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Model in Rats. Novel Propofol Analogs: Design, Synthesis and Evaluation of Dihydrobenzofuran Derivatives as General Anesthetics. Adaptogenic and Neuroprotective Effects of the Thai Herbal Formula AYW-KK-04 Against Chronic Stress-Induced Cognitive Impairment. Biological Treatment of Psoriasis-Data So Far.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1