Real-Time Pharmacovigilance: Transforming Population-Based Monitoring of Post-Approval Vaccine Safety Through Rapid Cycle Analysis (RCA)-A Review of the Published Literature.

IF 5.7 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Pharmaceuticals Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.3390/ph18010080
Sampada Gandhi, Michelle R Iannacone, Andrea Leapley, Li Wang, Mwedusasa Mtenga, Muhammad Younus, Joanne Wu
{"title":"Real-Time Pharmacovigilance: Transforming Population-Based Monitoring of Post-Approval Vaccine Safety Through Rapid Cycle Analysis (RCA)-A Review of the Published Literature.","authors":"Sampada Gandhi, Michelle R Iannacone, Andrea Leapley, Li Wang, Mwedusasa Mtenga, Muhammad Younus, Joanne Wu","doi":"10.3390/ph18010080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Rapid cycle analysis (RCA) is an established and efficient methodology that has been traditionally utilized by United States health authorities to monitor post-approval vaccine safety. Initially developed in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) in early 2000s, RCA has evolved into a valuable approach for timely post-approval signal detection. Due to the availability of additional near real-time data sources and enhanced analytic approaches, the use of RCA has expanded. This narrative review provides an in-depth assessment of studies that utilized RCA for safety surveillance to detect and evaluate safety signals in post-approval vaccine monitoring. <b>Methods</b>: Embase and Medline were searched on 8 August 2024 to identify post-approval non-interventional vaccine safety studies using RCA or other near real-time surveillance methods published from 1 January 2018 to 31 July 2024. Data on study characteristics (e.g., study population, data source, outcomes) and RCA methodological characteristics (e.g., type of comparator, sequential testing method, confounding control method) were extracted from the eligible RCA studies. <b>Results</b>: Of 1128 articles screened, 18 RCA vaccine safety studies were included, of which 17 (94.4%) were conducted in the United States (US). Twelve (67%) aimed at signal detection and six (33%) conducted further signal evaluation. Over 60% examined COVID-19 vaccine safety, with half using VSD. Over 80% conducted the RCA weekly or monthly and about 78% of the studies used a database-specific historical comparator group. <b>Conclusions</b>: This review indicates that most of the published articles on the application of the RCA methodology in vaccine safety studies are based on research conducted in the US. With increasing availability of near real-time data sources and advanced analytic methods capabilities, RCA is expected to be more widely deployed as an active surveillance tool to complement traditional pharmacovigilance. Future studies should explore the extension of vaccine RCA methodology for non-vaccine medicinal products.</p>","PeriodicalId":20198,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11769534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18010080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Rapid cycle analysis (RCA) is an established and efficient methodology that has been traditionally utilized by United States health authorities to monitor post-approval vaccine safety. Initially developed in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) in early 2000s, RCA has evolved into a valuable approach for timely post-approval signal detection. Due to the availability of additional near real-time data sources and enhanced analytic approaches, the use of RCA has expanded. This narrative review provides an in-depth assessment of studies that utilized RCA for safety surveillance to detect and evaluate safety signals in post-approval vaccine monitoring. Methods: Embase and Medline were searched on 8 August 2024 to identify post-approval non-interventional vaccine safety studies using RCA or other near real-time surveillance methods published from 1 January 2018 to 31 July 2024. Data on study characteristics (e.g., study population, data source, outcomes) and RCA methodological characteristics (e.g., type of comparator, sequential testing method, confounding control method) were extracted from the eligible RCA studies. Results: Of 1128 articles screened, 18 RCA vaccine safety studies were included, of which 17 (94.4%) were conducted in the United States (US). Twelve (67%) aimed at signal detection and six (33%) conducted further signal evaluation. Over 60% examined COVID-19 vaccine safety, with half using VSD. Over 80% conducted the RCA weekly or monthly and about 78% of the studies used a database-specific historical comparator group. Conclusions: This review indicates that most of the published articles on the application of the RCA methodology in vaccine safety studies are based on research conducted in the US. With increasing availability of near real-time data sources and advanced analytic methods capabilities, RCA is expected to be more widely deployed as an active surveillance tool to complement traditional pharmacovigilance. Future studies should explore the extension of vaccine RCA methodology for non-vaccine medicinal products.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实时药物警戒:通过快速循环分析(RCA)转变基于人群的疫苗批准后安全性监测——已发表文献综述
背景/目的:快速循环分析(RCA)是一种既定和有效的方法,传统上被美国卫生当局用于监测批准后疫苗的安全性。RCA最初是在21世纪初在疫苗安全数据链(VSD)中发展起来的,现已发展成为一种及时检测批准后信号的有价值的方法。由于其他近实时数据源的可用性和增强的分析方法,RCA的使用范围已经扩大。这篇叙述性综述对利用RCA进行安全监测的研究进行了深入评估,以发现和评估批准后疫苗监测中的安全信号。方法:于2024年8月8日检索Embase和Medline,以确定2018年1月1日至2024年7月31日发表的使用RCA或其他近实时监测方法的批准后非介入性疫苗安全性研究。从符合条件的RCA研究中提取有关研究特征(如研究人群、数据源、结果)和RCA方法学特征(如比较器类型、顺序检验方法、混杂对照方法)的数据。结果:在筛选的1128篇文章中,纳入了18项RCA疫苗安全性研究,其中17项(94.4%)在美国进行。12个(67%)旨在检测信号,6个(33%)进行进一步的信号评估。超过60%的人检查了COVID-19疫苗的安全性,其中一半使用了VSD。超过80%的研究每周或每月进行一次RCA,约78%的研究使用特定于数据库的历史比较组。结论:本综述表明,大多数已发表的关于RCA方法在疫苗安全性研究中的应用的文章都是基于在美国进行的研究。随着近实时数据源的日益可用性和先进的分析方法能力,RCA有望作为一种主动监测工具得到更广泛的部署,以补充传统的药物警戒。未来的研究应探索将疫苗RCA方法扩展到非疫苗药品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceuticals
Pharmaceuticals Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
1332
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceuticals (ISSN 1424-8247) is an international scientific journal of medicinal chemistry and related drug sciences.Our aim is to publish updated reviews as well as research articles with comprehensive theoretical and experimental details. Short communications are also accepted; therefore, there is no restriction on the maximum length of the papers.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTED: Ferlazzo et al. A Flavonoid-Rich Extract from Bergamot Juice, Alone or in Association with Curcumin and Resveratrol, Shows Protective Effects in a Murine Model of Cadmium-Induced Testicular Injury. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 386. Metabolite Profiling of Lavender (Lavandula pedunculata subsp. cariensis) Essential Oil and Investigation of Its Potential Antioxidant and Enzyme-Inhibitory Effects. Development and Study of Hydrophilic Ointment Compositions with a Dextrin/Polyvinyl Alcohol/Iodine Complex (D/PVA/I). Discovery of Macrocyclic Peptide Inhibitors Targeting MYC Oncoprotein via mRNA Display. AI-Assisted Identification of a Putative Allosteric Ligand Targeting the CDK4/Cyclin D1 Protein-Protein Interface.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1