Breast cancer outcomes after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy in BRCA pathogenic mutation carriers versus non-BRCA carriers

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiotherapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110710
Nir Moshe , Ory Haisraely , Ofer Globus , Renata Faermann , Narmeen Abu-Shehada , Debbie Anaby , Einav Gal Yam , Nora Balint Lahat , Shira Galper , Tehillah Menes , Josef Haik , Miri Sklair-Levy , Cecille Oedegaard , Thorsten Kuehn , Monica Morrow , Philip Poortmans , Rinat Bernstein-Molho , Orit Kaidar-Person
{"title":"Breast cancer outcomes after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy in BRCA pathogenic mutation carriers versus non-BRCA carriers","authors":"Nir Moshe ,&nbsp;Ory Haisraely ,&nbsp;Ofer Globus ,&nbsp;Renata Faermann ,&nbsp;Narmeen Abu-Shehada ,&nbsp;Debbie Anaby ,&nbsp;Einav Gal Yam ,&nbsp;Nora Balint Lahat ,&nbsp;Shira Galper ,&nbsp;Tehillah Menes ,&nbsp;Josef Haik ,&nbsp;Miri Sklair-Levy ,&nbsp;Cecille Oedegaard ,&nbsp;Thorsten Kuehn ,&nbsp;Monica Morrow ,&nbsp;Philip Poortmans ,&nbsp;Rinat Bernstein-Molho ,&nbsp;Orit Kaidar-Person","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our previous study on breast cancer <em>BRCA</em> carriers disclosed a high local recurrence (LR) rate in patients who underwent skin sparing (SSM) or nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) without postoperative radiation therapy (RT), compared to breast conservation surgery or mastectomy with RT. The current study compares the LR rates in <em>BRCA</em> versus non <em>BRCA</em> carriers after SSM/NSM in relation the receipt of RT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Data collected included patient- (e.g., age), tumour- (e.g., subtype, stage), and treatment-related factors and outcomes. LR was defined as ipsilateral chest wall recurrence. P value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 255 patients (127 <em>BRCA</em>, 128 non-<em>BRCA</em>) were included. Patients who did not receive RT had an earlier disease stage (most N0). No differences were found for LR rate in non-<em>BRCA</em> versus <em>BRCA</em> groups per involved breast and per patient. Comparing the subgroup of patients who did not receive RT, there were no statistically significant differences in LR between non-<em>BRCA</em> versus <em>BRCA</em> (p-value &gt; 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences in LR for the subgroup of patients who did receive RT (p-value &gt; 0.05). Regardless of <em>BRCA</em> status, patients who received RT had significantly lower LR rates. No differences in overall survival were noted between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results confirm high LR rates after SSM and NSM in patients who are not treated with RT, independent of <em>BRCA</em>-status. This mandate further investigation, as previous studies did not show a benefit of postmastectomy RT in the early breast cancer stage of those patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 110710"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814025000052","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our previous study on breast cancer BRCA carriers disclosed a high local recurrence (LR) rate in patients who underwent skin sparing (SSM) or nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) without postoperative radiation therapy (RT), compared to breast conservation surgery or mastectomy with RT. The current study compares the LR rates in BRCA versus non BRCA carriers after SSM/NSM in relation the receipt of RT.

Methods

The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Data collected included patient- (e.g., age), tumour- (e.g., subtype, stage), and treatment-related factors and outcomes. LR was defined as ipsilateral chest wall recurrence. P value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 255 patients (127 BRCA, 128 non-BRCA) were included. Patients who did not receive RT had an earlier disease stage (most N0). No differences were found for LR rate in non-BRCA versus BRCA groups per involved breast and per patient. Comparing the subgroup of patients who did not receive RT, there were no statistically significant differences in LR between non-BRCA versus BRCA (p-value > 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences in LR for the subgroup of patients who did receive RT (p-value > 0.05). Regardless of BRCA status, patients who received RT had significantly lower LR rates. No differences in overall survival were noted between the groups.

Conclusions

Our results confirm high LR rates after SSM and NSM in patients who are not treated with RT, independent of BRCA-status. This mandate further investigation, as previous studies did not show a benefit of postmastectomy RT in the early breast cancer stage of those patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BRCA致病突变携带者与非BRCA携带者在保留皮肤和乳头乳房切除术后的乳腺癌预后。
我们之前对BRCA乳腺癌携带者的研究发现,与保乳手术或乳房切除术合并放疗相比,接受皮肤保留(SSM)或乳头保留乳房切除术(NSM)而不进行术后放射治疗(RT)的患者局部复发率(LR)较高。目前的研究比较了SSM/NSM后BRCA与非BRCA携带者的LR率与接受放疗的关系。收集的数据包括患者(如年龄)、肿瘤(如亚型、分期)以及与治疗相关的因素和结果。LR定义为同侧胸壁复发。P值 ≤ 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:共纳入255例患者(127例BRCA, 128例非BRCA)。未接受RT治疗的患者病程较早(多数为0)。非BRCA组和BRCA组的LR率在每个受累乳房和每个患者中没有差异。与未接受RT治疗的亚组患者相比,非BRCA患者与BRCA患者的LR无统计学差异(p值 > 0.05)。同样,接受RT治疗的亚组患者的LR也没有显著差异(p值 > 0.05)。无论BRCA状态如何,接受放疗的患者LR率显著降低。两组之间的总生存率没有差异。结论:我们的研究结果证实,在未接受RT治疗的患者中,SSM和NSM后的LR率较高,与brca状态无关。这需要进一步的调查,因为之前的研究没有显示乳房切除术后RT对早期乳腺癌患者有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
期刊最新文献
Systematic review of facial deformation following paediatric head and neck radiation therapy: A call for standardised outcome assessment and dose–response evidence Integrity of delivered dose in temporally fractionated lattice radiotherapy amid anatomical changes and setup uncertainties Six versus five fractions per week (chemo)-radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma – A nationwide cohort study from the Swedish head and neck cancer register Multiparametric MRI assessment of 6-month Post-Treatment response following Real-Time adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Correlation with Post-Treatment PSA kinetics From evidence to practice: Real-world implementation of ESGO 2023 guidelines for adjuvant radiotherapy in vulvar cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1