Basic Considerations for Data Pooling Strategy in Multi-Regional Clinical Trials (MRCTs).

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s43441-025-00744-8
Jiali Song, Chen Ji, Meng Chen, Jun Dong, Chao Zhu, Haiyan Wu, Wei Zhang, Kezhou Zhang, Bing Yu, Yun Wang, Hua Zhang, Fan Jia, Yan Hou
{"title":"Basic Considerations for Data Pooling Strategy in Multi-Regional Clinical Trials (MRCTs).","authors":"Jiali Song, Chen Ji, Meng Chen, Jun Dong, Chao Zhu, Haiyan Wu, Wei Zhang, Kezhou Zhang, Bing Yu, Yun Wang, Hua Zhang, Fan Jia, Yan Hou","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00744-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The National Medical Products Administration of China has been implementing ICH E17, which describes the general principles for planning and designing of multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs), yet there are several ambiguities in the execution and conduct remains in China or East Asia. In specific, pooling strategy, effect modifiers (EMs), statistical analysis, sample size allocation and their impact in alignment with global trial remains a challenge. In this paper, we explore on the criteria mentioned above under the context of China. EMs need to be determined and identified from intrinsic and extrinsic factors which might have the impact to the drug on specific populations. If no EMs are found, we use pooling by regions to understand whether differences across East Asian population exists, and whether pooling by East Asian is necessary. Statistical models used in the analysis are also listed to estimate the drug effect in pooled populations. In summary, this paper outlines the details of the MRCTs practices in China and provides better insights in practice both domestically and internationally for any future improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"359-364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00744-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The National Medical Products Administration of China has been implementing ICH E17, which describes the general principles for planning and designing of multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs), yet there are several ambiguities in the execution and conduct remains in China or East Asia. In specific, pooling strategy, effect modifiers (EMs), statistical analysis, sample size allocation and their impact in alignment with global trial remains a challenge. In this paper, we explore on the criteria mentioned above under the context of China. EMs need to be determined and identified from intrinsic and extrinsic factors which might have the impact to the drug on specific populations. If no EMs are found, we use pooling by regions to understand whether differences across East Asian population exists, and whether pooling by East Asian is necessary. Statistical models used in the analysis are also listed to estimate the drug effect in pooled populations. In summary, this paper outlines the details of the MRCTs practices in China and provides better insights in practice both domestically and internationally for any future improvements.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多区域临床试验(mrct)数据池策略的基本考虑。
中国国家药品监督管理局一直在实施ICH E17,其中描述了规划和设计多区域临床试验(mrct)的一般原则,但在中国或东亚,在执行和实施方面仍存在一些含糊之处。具体而言,合并策略、效应调节剂(EMs)、统计分析、样本量分配及其对全球试验的影响仍然是一个挑战。本文将在中国的背景下对上述标准进行探讨。EMs需要从可能对特定人群的药物产生影响的内在和外在因素中确定和识别。如果没有发现新兴市场,我们使用区域汇总来了解东亚人口之间是否存在差异,以及东亚人口是否有必要进行汇总。分析中使用的统计模型也被列出来估计药物在汇总人群中的作用。总之,本文概述了中国磁共振ct实践的细节,并为未来的改进提供了更好的国内和国际实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
期刊最新文献
Missing Data Handling in the Application of Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Does the Epoch-Making Guideline Need Instructions for Use?: Analyzing Adverse Events Collected through Selective Safety Data Collection Under ICH E19 Guideline with Addressing Implementation Considerations. The Future of Biologics: Lessons from Hatch-Waxman. Power Calculation for Non-inferiority Test Based on Linear Combination of Two Correlated Binary Endpoints. "Measurement or Judgment?" Reconsidering Data Quality and Inference in EudraVigilance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1