Non-medicinal oral contrast in upper abdominal MRI for MR-guided radiotherapy: A scoping review

IF 2.8 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2025.01.003
M.R. Beasley , A.M. Henry , J. Bestall , V.P. Cosgrove , L.J. Murray , C. Burnett
{"title":"Non-medicinal oral contrast in upper abdominal MRI for MR-guided radiotherapy: A scoping review","authors":"M.R. Beasley ,&nbsp;A.M. Henry ,&nbsp;J. Bestall ,&nbsp;V.P. Cosgrove ,&nbsp;L.J. Murray ,&nbsp;C. Burnett","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Using non-medicinal oral contrast agents may aid safe delivery of magnetic resonance image-guided (MR-guided) radiotherapy by improving the ability to visualise and avoid excessive radiation dose to adjacent bowel/stomach. This scoping review aims to map the literature on non-medicinal oral contrasts used in upper-abdominal diagnostic or therapeutic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to find potential candidates for employing in MR-guided radiotherapy and identify gaps in knowledge for further study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review of non-medicinal oral contrast used in upper-abdominal MRI research followed a pre-defined protocol based on Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. Data were charted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-seven studies from 1955 screened abstracts were charted. Thirty-one distinct non-medicinal oral contrast were identified, used primarily to enhance tissue visualisation (89 %) or observe motility (11 %) in diagnostic studies. All studies reported to be predominantly quantitative; only 13 % included participant experience via questionnaires and none used qualitative methods. No studies have examined the efficacy of non-medicinal oral contrasts in MR-guided radiotherapy planning or delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Non-medicinal oral contrasts have been extensively investigated in diagnostic MRI to enhance gastrointestinal visualisation and assess motility. However, non-medicinal oral contrasts have not been investigated in the context of radiotherapy planning and treatment. Qualitative evaluation of the patient experience of non-medicinal oral contrasts in magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy should be considered alongside studies quantifying the potential clinical benefit.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>This review summarises the properties of non-medicinal oral contrasts and identifies critical gaps in the current evidence, particularly the absence of qualitative research in this domain and the unexplored potential for their application in MR-guided radiotherapy planning and delivery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 2","pages":"Article 102868"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Using non-medicinal oral contrast agents may aid safe delivery of magnetic resonance image-guided (MR-guided) radiotherapy by improving the ability to visualise and avoid excessive radiation dose to adjacent bowel/stomach. This scoping review aims to map the literature on non-medicinal oral contrasts used in upper-abdominal diagnostic or therapeutic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to find potential candidates for employing in MR-guided radiotherapy and identify gaps in knowledge for further study.

Methods

A scoping review of non-medicinal oral contrast used in upper-abdominal MRI research followed a pre-defined protocol based on Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. Data were charted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines.

Results

Forty-seven studies from 1955 screened abstracts were charted. Thirty-one distinct non-medicinal oral contrast were identified, used primarily to enhance tissue visualisation (89 %) or observe motility (11 %) in diagnostic studies. All studies reported to be predominantly quantitative; only 13 % included participant experience via questionnaires and none used qualitative methods. No studies have examined the efficacy of non-medicinal oral contrasts in MR-guided radiotherapy planning or delivery.

Conclusion

Non-medicinal oral contrasts have been extensively investigated in diagnostic MRI to enhance gastrointestinal visualisation and assess motility. However, non-medicinal oral contrasts have not been investigated in the context of radiotherapy planning and treatment. Qualitative evaluation of the patient experience of non-medicinal oral contrasts in magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy should be considered alongside studies quantifying the potential clinical benefit.

Implications for practice

This review summarises the properties of non-medicinal oral contrasts and identifies critical gaps in the current evidence, particularly the absence of qualitative research in this domain and the unexplored potential for their application in MR-guided radiotherapy planning and delivery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磁共振引导下的上腹部MRI非药物口服造影剂:范围回顾。
简介:使用非药物口服造影剂可以通过提高显像能力和避免对邻近肠/胃的过量辐射剂量来帮助磁共振成像引导(MR-guided)放射治疗的安全传递。本综述旨在绘制用于上腹部诊断或治疗性磁共振成像(MRI)的非药物口服对比的文献,以寻找用于MRI引导放射治疗的潜在候选物,并确定知识空白以供进一步研究。方法:采用基于Arksey和O'Malley框架的预定义方案,对用于上腹部MRI研究的非药物口服造影剂进行范围审查。根据系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的荟萃分析报告指南,绘制数据图表并进行报告。结果:对1955年筛选摘要的47项研究进行了图表分析。鉴定出31种不同的非药用口服造影剂,主要用于增强组织显像(89%)或在诊断研究中观察运动性(11%)。所有的研究报告主要是定量的;只有13%的人通过问卷调查纳入了参与者的经历,没有人使用定性方法。没有研究检验非药物口服对比剂在磁共振引导放射治疗计划或递送中的疗效。结论:非药物口服对比在诊断性MRI中得到了广泛的研究,以增强胃肠显像和评估胃肠运动。然而,在放疗计划和治疗的背景下,非药物口服对比尚未进行调查。对磁共振成像引导放射治疗中非药物口服对比剂患者体验的定性评价应与量化潜在临床获益的研究同时考虑。对实践的影响:本综述总结了非药用口服对照物的特性,并确定了当前证据中的关键空白,特别是在这一领域缺乏定性研究,以及它们在磁共振引导放射治疗计划和递送中的应用潜力尚未开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
Bridging the green gap: aligning rwandan medical imaging education with national and global sustainability goals A systematic review on the acceptability, perception, preference, comfort, and burdens associated with radiological investigations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients. Diagnostic performance of phase-contrast computed tomography versus digital mammography: A pilot study Performance of a complete AI radiographic suite across 258,373 X-rays from 26 countries: A worldwide evaluation Exploring social accountability in radiography education: Student perspectives on current practices and understanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1