Eccentric reaming is superior to augmented components in B2 glenoids: a biomechanical study

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.015
Zachary DeVries MD , Rashed AlAhmed MBChB, MSc, FRCSC , Ariane Parisien MSc , Nicholas Nucci MD , Andrew Speirs PhD , Kellen Walsh MD, FRCSC , J. Whitcomb Pollock MD, FRCSC, MSc , Katie McIlquham HBScHK , Peter Lapner MD, FRCSC
{"title":"Eccentric reaming is superior to augmented components in B2 glenoids: a biomechanical study","authors":"Zachary DeVries MD ,&nbsp;Rashed AlAhmed MBChB, MSc, FRCSC ,&nbsp;Ariane Parisien MSc ,&nbsp;Nicholas Nucci MD ,&nbsp;Andrew Speirs PhD ,&nbsp;Kellen Walsh MD, FRCSC ,&nbsp;J. Whitcomb Pollock MD, FRCSC, MSc ,&nbsp;Katie McIlquham HBScHK ,&nbsp;Peter Lapner MD, FRCSC","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>Primary glenohumeral arthritis is typically associated with glenoid retroversion and posterior bone loss<span>. Glenoid component fixation remains a weak link in the survivorship of anatomical </span></span>total shoulder arthroplasty, particularly in the B2 glenoid. The aim of this study was to compare biomechanical properties of 2 glenoid preparation techniques in a B2 glenoid bone loss model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a biomechanical cyclic loading study. Thirty sawbone shoulder models were generated from a computed tomography scan<span> of a scapula with a B2 glenoid and 15° retroversion. The study consisted of 2 groups with ‘low’ correction (A groups), 2 groups with ‘high’ correction (B groups), and a control. Group A1 consisted of a 7° eccentric ream and a standard component; group A2 consisted of a 15° posteriorly augmented glenoid component (7° correction); group B1 consisted of a 12° anterior ream and standard component; group B2 used a 25° posteriorly augmented component (12° correction); group C (control) consisted of a standard component inserted in retroversion with no correction. Mechanical stability testing was performed through cyclic loading and resulting displacement was determined at 1, 10, 1000, 10,000, 50,000, and 100,000 cycles to assess for loosening.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 26 samples were included in the analysis, all reaching 100,000 cycles. Displacement increased significantly from baseline to 100,000 cycles in all groups (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). At 100,000 cycles, the B1 group (1.4 mm ± 0.19) had significantly less displacement then the A2 (2.0 mm ± 0.29) and B2 (2.2 mm ± 0.49) (<em>P</em> = .0.005) groups. There were no significant differences in translational forces between any of the groups at 100,000 cycles.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our data demonstrated that the use of higher degree posteriorly augmented components resulted in statistically greater translational displacement over time compared with high-side reaming and use of a standard component. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"34 9","pages":"Pages 2239-2245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274625000758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Primary glenohumeral arthritis is typically associated with glenoid retroversion and posterior bone loss. Glenoid component fixation remains a weak link in the survivorship of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty, particularly in the B2 glenoid. The aim of this study was to compare biomechanical properties of 2 glenoid preparation techniques in a B2 glenoid bone loss model.

Methods

This was a biomechanical cyclic loading study. Thirty sawbone shoulder models were generated from a computed tomography scan of a scapula with a B2 glenoid and 15° retroversion. The study consisted of 2 groups with ‘low’ correction (A groups), 2 groups with ‘high’ correction (B groups), and a control. Group A1 consisted of a 7° eccentric ream and a standard component; group A2 consisted of a 15° posteriorly augmented glenoid component (7° correction); group B1 consisted of a 12° anterior ream and standard component; group B2 used a 25° posteriorly augmented component (12° correction); group C (control) consisted of a standard component inserted in retroversion with no correction. Mechanical stability testing was performed through cyclic loading and resulting displacement was determined at 1, 10, 1000, 10,000, 50,000, and 100,000 cycles to assess for loosening.

Results

A total of 26 samples were included in the analysis, all reaching 100,000 cycles. Displacement increased significantly from baseline to 100,000 cycles in all groups (P < .05). At 100,000 cycles, the B1 group (1.4 mm ± 0.19) had significantly less displacement then the A2 (2.0 mm ± 0.29) and B2 (2.2 mm ± 0.49) (P = .0.005) groups. There were no significant differences in translational forces between any of the groups at 100,000 cycles.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrated that the use of higher degree posteriorly augmented components resulted in statistically greater translational displacement over time compared with high-side reaming and use of a standard component. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物力学研究:B2型关节盂偏心扩孔优于增广扩孔。
简介:原发性盂肱关节炎通常与盂后翻和后骨丢失有关。在解剖型全肩关节置换术中,特别是在B2型肩关节中,关节盂内固定仍然是一个薄弱环节。本研究的目的是比较两种关节盂制备技术在B2关节盂骨丢失模型中的生物力学特性。方法:这是一项生物力学循环加载研究。30个锯骨肩胛骨模型是通过CT扫描生成的,肩胛骨为B2关节盂和150度后倾。该研究包括两组“低”校正组(A组),两组“高”校正组(B组)和一个对照组。A1组包括一个70偏心组和一个标准组;A2组为150°后增强肩关节假体(70°矫正);B1组为前牙组和标准组;B2组采用250后增分量(120校正);C组(对照组)采用标准假体插入,不进行矫正。通过循环加载进行机械稳定性测试,并在1、10、1000、10,000、50,000和100,000次循环中确定位移,以评估松动情况。结果:共纳入26个样本,均达到10万周期。在所有组中,位移从基线显著增加到100,000个周期(结论:我们的数据表明,随着时间的推移,与高侧扩孔和使用标准组件相比,使用更高程度的后增强组件会导致统计上更大的平移位移。需要进一步的前瞻性临床研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Muscle activation variability in relation to functional internal rotation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for rotator cuff repair surgery Functional and radiographic outcomes after surgical management of complex proximal ulna fractures: a retrospective case series Pyrolytic carbon head hemiarthroplasty vs. cobalt-chromium head for proximal humerus fractures: a short-term follow-up study Incidence and risk factors for aseptic glenoid baseplate loosening in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty using the Aramis implant baseplate with a minimum of 2 years follow-up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1