Psychometric Properties of the Self Care Oral Anticancer Agents Index (SCOAAI)

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Seminars in Oncology Nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151810
Marco Di Nitto , Silvia Ucciero , Tatiana Bolgeo , Vincenzo Damico , Greta Ghizzardi , Sipontina Rita Zerulo , Mario Roselli , Rosaria Alvaro , Francesco Torino , Ercole Vellone
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Self Care Oral Anticancer Agents Index (SCOAAI)","authors":"Marco Di Nitto ,&nbsp;Silvia Ucciero ,&nbsp;Tatiana Bolgeo ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Damico ,&nbsp;Greta Ghizzardi ,&nbsp;Sipontina Rita Zerulo ,&nbsp;Mario Roselli ,&nbsp;Rosaria Alvaro ,&nbsp;Francesco Torino ,&nbsp;Ercole Vellone","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To test the Self-Care Oral Anticancer Agents Index (SCOAAI)’s psychometric properties (structural validity, convergent validity, predictive validity, and internal consistency) in a sample of patients with solid tumour on Oral anticancer agents (OAA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A methodological research in five in- or out-patient Italian facilities. Structural validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to test associations between SCOAAI scores and patient's emergency room admission, re-hospitalization, mortality, and quality of life measured three months after baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We enrolled 356 patients; mostly were male (52.24%), and mean age was 59.10 years. Analyses demonstrated the SCOAAI's factorial validity and internal consistency. Moreover, patients that experienced emergency room admissions (U = 3484.5; <em>P</em> = .002) and re-hospitalization (U = 2446.0; <em>P</em> = .001) showed lower self-care maintenance scores; those who experienced emergency room admission (U = 3263.5; <em>P</em> = .019) and died at follow-up (U = 700.5; <em>P</em> = .025) had lower self-care monitoring scores; while patients that experienced re-hospitalisation (U = 2931.5; <em>P</em> = .040) and emergency room admission (U = 3285.0; <em>P</em> = .012) had lower self-care management scores. Patients with adequate self-care (≥ 70) reported significantly higher quality of life (self-care maintenance U = 1228.500, <em>P</em> &lt; .001; self-care monitoring U = 3512.500, <em>P</em> &lt; .001; self-care management U = 3287.500, <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>According to our findings the SCOAAI is a valid and reliable tool. Patients with inadequate self-care can experience more emergency room accesses, re-hospitalization, death, and lower quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing Practice</h3><div>Adequate self-care behaviors can improve patient's outcomes and should be assessed by healthcare providers during the disease pathway.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":"41 2","pages":"Article 151810"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208125000038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To test the Self-Care Oral Anticancer Agents Index (SCOAAI)’s psychometric properties (structural validity, convergent validity, predictive validity, and internal consistency) in a sample of patients with solid tumour on Oral anticancer agents (OAA).

Methods

A methodological research in five in- or out-patient Italian facilities. Structural validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to test associations between SCOAAI scores and patient's emergency room admission, re-hospitalization, mortality, and quality of life measured three months after baseline.

Results

We enrolled 356 patients; mostly were male (52.24%), and mean age was 59.10 years. Analyses demonstrated the SCOAAI's factorial validity and internal consistency. Moreover, patients that experienced emergency room admissions (U = 3484.5; P = .002) and re-hospitalization (U = 2446.0; P = .001) showed lower self-care maintenance scores; those who experienced emergency room admission (U = 3263.5; P = .019) and died at follow-up (U = 700.5; P = .025) had lower self-care monitoring scores; while patients that experienced re-hospitalisation (U = 2931.5; P = .040) and emergency room admission (U = 3285.0; P = .012) had lower self-care management scores. Patients with adequate self-care (≥ 70) reported significantly higher quality of life (self-care maintenance U = 1228.500, P < .001; self-care monitoring U = 3512.500, P < .001; self-care management U = 3287.500, P < .001).

Conclusion

According to our findings the SCOAAI is a valid and reliable tool. Patients with inadequate self-care can experience more emergency room accesses, re-hospitalization, death, and lower quality of life.

Implications for Nursing Practice

Adequate self-care behaviors can improve patient's outcomes and should be assessed by healthcare providers during the disease pathway.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我保健口服抗癌药物指数(SCOAAI)的心理测量特性。
目的在使用口服抗癌药(OAA)的实体瘤患者样本中测试口服抗癌药自我护理指数(SCOAAI)的心理测量特性(结构有效性、收敛有效性、预测有效性和内部一致性):方法:在意大利五家住院或门诊机构进行方法研究。结构有效性通过确认性因子分析进行检验,内部一致性通过克朗巴赫α和复合信度进行评估。曼-惠特尼U检验用于检验SCOAAI评分与患者急诊入院、再次住院、死亡率以及基线三个月后的生活质量之间的关系:我们共招募了 356 名患者,其中大部分为男性(52.24%),平均年龄为 59.10 岁。分析表明,SCOAAI 具有因子有效性和内部一致性。此外,经历过急诊入院(U = 3484.5;P = .002)和再次住院(U = 2446.0;P = .001)的患者自我护理维持得分较低;经历过急诊入院(U = 3263.5;P = .019) 和随访时死亡 (U = 700.5; P = .025) 的患者自我护理监测得分较低;而再次入院 (U = 2931.5; P = .040) 和急诊入院 (U = 3285.0; P = .012) 的患者自我护理管理得分较低。具有充分自我护理能力(≥ 70 分)的患者的生活质量明显更高(自我护理维持 U = 1228.500,P < .001;自我护理监测 U = 3512.500,P < .001;自我护理管理 U = 3287.500,P < .001):根据我们的研究结果,SCOAAI 是一种有效、可靠的工具。结论:根据我们的研究结果,SCOAAI 是一种有效、可靠的工具。自我护理不足的患者可能会经历更多的急诊就诊、再次住院、死亡和生活质量下降:对护理实践的启示:适当的自我护理行为可改善患者的预后,医疗服务提供者应在疾病过程中对其进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Masthead Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Intention of Cancer Surveillance Among Patients With Hereditary Colorectal Cancer on the Basis of Theory of Planned Behavior What are the Key Components of an Advanced Nurse Practitioner (ANP) Led High-Risk Family History Breast Clinic? A Scoping Review “The Nurse's Role in Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Neoplastic Syndromes: A Scoping Review”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1