Machine learning prediction of in-hospital mortality and external validation in patients with cardiogenic shock: the RESCUE score

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Revista española de cardiología (English ed.) Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.rec.2025.01.003
Ji Hyun Cha , Ki Hong Choi , Chul-Min Ahn , Cheol Woong Yu , Ik Hyun Park , Woo Jin Jang , Hyun-Joong Kim , Jang-Whan Bae , Sung Uk Kwon , Hyun-Jong Lee , Wang Soo Lee , Jin-Ok Jeong , Sang-Don Park , Taek Kyu Park , Joo Myung Lee , Young Bin Song , Joo-Yong Hahn , Seung-Hyuk Choi , Hyeon-Cheol Gwon , Jeong Hoon Yang
{"title":"Machine learning prediction of in-hospital mortality and external validation in patients with cardiogenic shock: the RESCUE score","authors":"Ji Hyun Cha ,&nbsp;Ki Hong Choi ,&nbsp;Chul-Min Ahn ,&nbsp;Cheol Woong Yu ,&nbsp;Ik Hyun Park ,&nbsp;Woo Jin Jang ,&nbsp;Hyun-Joong Kim ,&nbsp;Jang-Whan Bae ,&nbsp;Sung Uk Kwon ,&nbsp;Hyun-Jong Lee ,&nbsp;Wang Soo Lee ,&nbsp;Jin-Ok Jeong ,&nbsp;Sang-Don Park ,&nbsp;Taek Kyu Park ,&nbsp;Joo Myung Lee ,&nbsp;Young Bin Song ,&nbsp;Joo-Yong Hahn ,&nbsp;Seung-Hyuk Choi ,&nbsp;Hyeon-Cheol Gwon ,&nbsp;Jeong Hoon Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>Despite advances in mechanical circulatory support, mortality rates in cardiogenic shock (CS) remain high. A reliable risk stratification system could serve as a valuable guide in the clinical management of patients with CS. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality in CS patients using machine learning (ML) algorithms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 1247 patients with all-cause CS in the RESCUE registry (January 2014-December 2018) were analyzed. Key predictive variables were identified using 4 ML algorithms. A risk prediction model, the RESCUE score, was developed using logistic regression based on the selected variables. Internal validation was conducted within the RESCUE registry, and external validation was performed using an independent CS registry of 750 patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 4 ML models identified 7 predictors: age, vasoactive inotropic score, left ventricular ejection fraction, lactic acid level, in-hospital cardiac arrest at presentation, need for continuous renal replacement therapy, and mechanical ventilation. The RESCUE score demonstrated strong predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.83-0.88) for in-hospital mortality. Ten-fold internal cross-validation yielded an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.77-0.95). External validation showed an AUC of 0.80 (95%CI, 0.76-0.84).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our ML-based risk-scoring system, the RESCUE score, demonstrated excellent predictive performance for in-hospital mortality in all patients with CS, regardless of cause. The system could be a useful and reliable tool to estimate risk stratification of CS in everyday clinical practice. Clinical trial registration: NCT02985008.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":"78 8","pages":"Pages 707-716"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1885585725000209","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

Despite advances in mechanical circulatory support, mortality rates in cardiogenic shock (CS) remain high. A reliable risk stratification system could serve as a valuable guide in the clinical management of patients with CS. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality in CS patients using machine learning (ML) algorithms.

Methods

Data from 1247 patients with all-cause CS in the RESCUE registry (January 2014-December 2018) were analyzed. Key predictive variables were identified using 4 ML algorithms. A risk prediction model, the RESCUE score, was developed using logistic regression based on the selected variables. Internal validation was conducted within the RESCUE registry, and external validation was performed using an independent CS registry of 750 patients.

Results

The 4 ML models identified 7 predictors: age, vasoactive inotropic score, left ventricular ejection fraction, lactic acid level, in-hospital cardiac arrest at presentation, need for continuous renal replacement therapy, and mechanical ventilation. The RESCUE score demonstrated strong predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.83-0.88) for in-hospital mortality. Ten-fold internal cross-validation yielded an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.77-0.95). External validation showed an AUC of 0.80 (95%CI, 0.76-0.84).

Conclusions

Our ML-based risk-scoring system, the RESCUE score, demonstrated excellent predictive performance for in-hospital mortality in all patients with CS, regardless of cause. The system could be a useful and reliable tool to estimate risk stratification of CS in everyday clinical practice. Clinical trial registration: NCT02985008.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习预测心源性休克患者的住院死亡率和外部验证:RESCUE评分。
前言和目的:尽管机械循环支持技术取得了进步,但心源性休克(CS)的死亡率仍然很高。一个可靠的风险分层系统可以为CS患者的临床管理提供有价值的指导。本研究旨在利用机器学习(ML)算法开发并外部验证CS患者住院死亡率的风险预测模型。方法:对2014年1月至2018年12月RESCUE登记的1247例全因CS患者的数据进行分析。使用4ml算法确定关键预测变量。基于所选变量,采用logistic回归建立了风险预测模型,即RESCUE评分。内部验证在RESCUE注册中心进行,外部验证使用750名患者的独立CS注册中心进行。结果:4ml模型确定了7个预测因素:年龄、血管活性肌力评分、左心室射血分数、乳酸水平、住院时心脏骤停、是否需要持续肾脏替代治疗和机械通气。RESCUE评分显示出很强的预测性能,对院内死亡率的AUC为0.86 (95%CI, 0.83-0.88)。10倍内部交叉验证的AUC为0.86 (95%CI, 0.77-0.95)。外部验证显示AUC为0.80 (95%CI, 0.76-0.84)。结论:我们基于ml的风险评分系统,即RESCUE评分,对所有CS患者的住院死亡率,无论原因如何,都表现出出色的预测性能。该系统可作为日常临床实践中评估CS风险分层的有效、可靠的工具。临床试验注册:NCT02985008。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊最新文献
Revista Española de Cardiología 2025. Predictive model of the cost-effectiveness of left bundle branch area pacing versus right ventricular apical pacing. Single-operator implantation of the new generation VitaFlow Liberty valve for efficient transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the SINGLE-TAVI study. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio association with functional capacity and outcomes in HF with reduced ejection fraction. Transcatheter aortic valve intervention in mixed Sievers type 1 bicuspid aortic valve disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1