Machine learning prediction of in-hospital mortality and external validation in patients with cardiogenic shock: the RESCUE score.

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Revista española de cardiología (English ed.) Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.rec.2025.01.003
Ji Hyun Cha, Ki Hong Choi, Chul-Min Ahn, Cheol Woong Yu, Ik Hyun Park, Woo Jin Jang, Hyun-Joong Kim, Jang-Whan Bae, Sung Uk Kwon, Hyun-Jong Lee, Wang Soo Lee, Jin-Ok Jeong, Sang-Don Park, Taek Kyu Park, Joo Myung Lee, Young Bin Song, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Jeong Hoon Yang
{"title":"Machine learning prediction of in-hospital mortality and external validation in patients with cardiogenic shock: the RESCUE score.","authors":"Ji Hyun Cha, Ki Hong Choi, Chul-Min Ahn, Cheol Woong Yu, Ik Hyun Park, Woo Jin Jang, Hyun-Joong Kim, Jang-Whan Bae, Sung Uk Kwon, Hyun-Jong Lee, Wang Soo Lee, Jin-Ok Jeong, Sang-Don Park, Taek Kyu Park, Joo Myung Lee, Young Bin Song, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Jeong Hoon Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Despite advances in mechanical circulatory support, mortality rates in cardiogenic shock (CS) remain high. A reliable risk stratification system could serve as a valuable guide in the clinical management of patients with CS. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality in CS patients using machine learning (ML) algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 1247 patients with all-cause CS in the RESCUE registry (January 2014-December 2018) were analyzed. Key predictive variables were identified using 4 ML algorithms. A risk prediction model, the RESCUE score, was developed using logistic regression based on the selected variables. Internal validation was conducted within the RESCUE registry, and external validation was performed using an independent CS registry of 750 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 4 ML models identified 7 predictors: age, vasoactive inotropic score, left ventricular ejection fraction, lactic acid level, in-hospital cardiac arrest at presentation, need for continuous renal replacement therapy, and mechanical ventilation. The RESCUE score demonstrated strong predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.83-0.88) for in-hospital mortality. Ten-fold internal cross-validation yielded an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.77-0.95). External validation showed an AUC of 0.80 (95%CI, 0.76-0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our ML-based risk-scoring system, the RESCUE score, demonstrated excellent predictive performance for in-hospital mortality in all patients with CS, regardless of cause. The system could be a useful and reliable tool to estimate risk stratification of CS in everyday clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT02985008.</p>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2025.01.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Despite advances in mechanical circulatory support, mortality rates in cardiogenic shock (CS) remain high. A reliable risk stratification system could serve as a valuable guide in the clinical management of patients with CS. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality in CS patients using machine learning (ML) algorithms.

Methods: Data from 1247 patients with all-cause CS in the RESCUE registry (January 2014-December 2018) were analyzed. Key predictive variables were identified using 4 ML algorithms. A risk prediction model, the RESCUE score, was developed using logistic regression based on the selected variables. Internal validation was conducted within the RESCUE registry, and external validation was performed using an independent CS registry of 750 patients.

Results: The 4 ML models identified 7 predictors: age, vasoactive inotropic score, left ventricular ejection fraction, lactic acid level, in-hospital cardiac arrest at presentation, need for continuous renal replacement therapy, and mechanical ventilation. The RESCUE score demonstrated strong predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.83-0.88) for in-hospital mortality. Ten-fold internal cross-validation yielded an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.77-0.95). External validation showed an AUC of 0.80 (95%CI, 0.76-0.84).

Conclusions: Our ML-based risk-scoring system, the RESCUE score, demonstrated excellent predictive performance for in-hospital mortality in all patients with CS, regardless of cause. The system could be a useful and reliable tool to estimate risk stratification of CS in everyday clinical practice.

Clinical trial registration: NCT02985008.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊最新文献
Early unloading and clinical outcomes in patients with fulminant myocarditis undergoing VA-ECMO: results of a multicenter retrospective study Transcatheter closure of multiple coronary artery fistulas: a coronary computed tomography angiography-based anatomic classification Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and cancer mortality. A real-world registry Role of spot urinary sodium in outpatients with heart failure Transapical transcatheter mitral valve replacement for mitral valve disease: an Iberian experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1