Emergency physician ultrasound diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum in intraoperative patients with peritoneal insufflation.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.023
Amy Sanghvi, Makoto Tanigawa, Michael Danta, Jeff Yang, Mohammad Hamshow, Errel Khordipour, Lawrence Haines, Leily Naraghi
{"title":"Emergency physician ultrasound diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum in intraoperative patients with peritoneal insufflation.","authors":"Amy Sanghvi, Makoto Tanigawa, Michael Danta, Jeff Yang, Mohammad Hamshow, Errel Khordipour, Lawrence Haines, Leily Naraghi","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the accuracy of emergency physicians (EPs) in diagnosing pneumoperitoneum with POCUS, and if the volume of pneumoperitoneum affects accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>POCUS clips were obtained from patients undergoing intraperitoneal insufflation for an elective laparoscopic procedure. Video clips of the right upper quadrant and epigastric regions were obtained prior to insufflation and then after 500 ml, 1000 ml, and 1500 ml of insufflation. These clips were randomized and reviewed by three blinded ultrasound-trained EPs. For each clip they determined whether pneumoperitoneum was present or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EPs chose correctly 71 % of the time. Overall sensitivity for detecting pneumoperitoneum was 66 % with a specificity of 85 %. Sensitivity for detecting small, medium, and large volumes of air was 53 %, 70 %, and 73 % respectively. The AUC for pneumoperitoneum overall was 0.753. The AUC for detecting small, medium, and large volumes of air was 0.688, 0.773, and 0.789 respectively. There was substantial agreement between EPs with a kappa of 0.658.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>POCUS for pneumoperitoneum had moderate sensitivity, high specificity and moderate accuracy. The sensitivities increased with increasing volumes of air. This data suggests that POCUS has similar sensitivity to CXR for pneumoperitoneum.</p>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"120-123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the accuracy of emergency physicians (EPs) in diagnosing pneumoperitoneum with POCUS, and if the volume of pneumoperitoneum affects accuracy.

Methods: POCUS clips were obtained from patients undergoing intraperitoneal insufflation for an elective laparoscopic procedure. Video clips of the right upper quadrant and epigastric regions were obtained prior to insufflation and then after 500 ml, 1000 ml, and 1500 ml of insufflation. These clips were randomized and reviewed by three blinded ultrasound-trained EPs. For each clip they determined whether pneumoperitoneum was present or not.

Results: EPs chose correctly 71 % of the time. Overall sensitivity for detecting pneumoperitoneum was 66 % with a specificity of 85 %. Sensitivity for detecting small, medium, and large volumes of air was 53 %, 70 %, and 73 % respectively. The AUC for pneumoperitoneum overall was 0.753. The AUC for detecting small, medium, and large volumes of air was 0.688, 0.773, and 0.789 respectively. There was substantial agreement between EPs with a kappa of 0.658.

Conclusions: POCUS for pneumoperitoneum had moderate sensitivity, high specificity and moderate accuracy. The sensitivities increased with increasing volumes of air. This data suggests that POCUS has similar sensitivity to CXR for pneumoperitoneum.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Sympathetic crashing acute pulmonary edema: Concerning CT, HFNO, and urapidil. MINOCA post-blood donation: Beyond volume loss. Response to the Letter: MINOCA Post-Blood Donation: Beyond Volume Loss. Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for intraabdominal pain relief. An uncommon case of ptosis from invasive bacterial sinusitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1