Emergency physician ultrasound diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum in intraoperative patients with peritoneal insufflation

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.023
Amy Sanghvi MD , Makoto Tanigawa MD , Michael Danta MD , Jeff Yang MD , Mohammad Hamshow MD , Errel Khordipour DO , Lawrence Haines MD , Leily Naraghi MD
{"title":"Emergency physician ultrasound diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum in intraoperative patients with peritoneal insufflation","authors":"Amy Sanghvi MD ,&nbsp;Makoto Tanigawa MD ,&nbsp;Michael Danta MD ,&nbsp;Jeff Yang MD ,&nbsp;Mohammad Hamshow MD ,&nbsp;Errel Khordipour DO ,&nbsp;Lawrence Haines MD ,&nbsp;Leily Naraghi MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine the accuracy of emergency physicians (EPs) in diagnosing pneumoperitoneum with POCUS, and if the volume of pneumoperitoneum affects accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>POCUS clips were obtained from patients undergoing intraperitoneal insufflation for an elective laparoscopic procedure. Video clips of the right upper quadrant and epigastric regions were obtained prior to insufflation and then after 500 ml, 1000 ml, and 1500 ml of insufflation. These clips were randomized and reviewed by three blinded ultrasound-trained EPs. For each clip they determined whether pneumoperitoneum was present or not.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>EPs chose correctly 71 % of the time. Overall sensitivity for detecting pneumoperitoneum was 66 % with a specificity of 85 %. Sensitivity for detecting small, medium, and large volumes of air was 53 %, 70 %, and 73 % respectively. The AUC for pneumoperitoneum overall was 0.753. The AUC for detecting small, medium, and large volumes of air was 0.688, 0.773, and 0.789 respectively. There was substantial agreement between EPs with a kappa of 0.658.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>POCUS for pneumoperitoneum had moderate sensitivity, high specificity and moderate accuracy. The sensitivities increased with increasing volumes of air. This data suggests that POCUS has similar sensitivity to CXR for pneumoperitoneum.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 120-123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725000245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the accuracy of emergency physicians (EPs) in diagnosing pneumoperitoneum with POCUS, and if the volume of pneumoperitoneum affects accuracy.

Methods

POCUS clips were obtained from patients undergoing intraperitoneal insufflation for an elective laparoscopic procedure. Video clips of the right upper quadrant and epigastric regions were obtained prior to insufflation and then after 500 ml, 1000 ml, and 1500 ml of insufflation. These clips were randomized and reviewed by three blinded ultrasound-trained EPs. For each clip they determined whether pneumoperitoneum was present or not.

Results

EPs chose correctly 71 % of the time. Overall sensitivity for detecting pneumoperitoneum was 66 % with a specificity of 85 %. Sensitivity for detecting small, medium, and large volumes of air was 53 %, 70 %, and 73 % respectively. The AUC for pneumoperitoneum overall was 0.753. The AUC for detecting small, medium, and large volumes of air was 0.688, 0.773, and 0.789 respectively. There was substantial agreement between EPs with a kappa of 0.658.

Conclusions

POCUS for pneumoperitoneum had moderate sensitivity, high specificity and moderate accuracy. The sensitivities increased with increasing volumes of air. This data suggests that POCUS has similar sensitivity to CXR for pneumoperitoneum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊医师超声诊断术中气腹患者腹膜充气。
目的:探讨急诊医师(EPs)诊断POCUS气腹的准确性,以及气腹的体积是否会影响其准确性。方法:从择期腹腔镜手术的患者中获得POCUS夹。分别在灌胃前、灌胃500 ml、1000 ml、1500 ml后获取右上象限和上腹部的视频片段。这些夹是随机的,并由三个盲超声训练的EPs进行评价。对于每个片段,他们确定是否存在气腹。结果:EPs的选择正确率为71%。检测气腹的总体敏感性为66%,特异性为85%。检测小、中、大体积空气的灵敏度分别为53%、70%和73%。气腹的总体AUC为0.753。检测小、中、大体积空气的AUC分别为0.688、0.773、0.789。EPs之间的kappa值为0.658,基本一致。结论:POCUS对气腹有中等敏感性、高特异性和中等准确性。灵敏度随空气量的增加而增加。这一数据表明POCUS对气腹的敏感性与CXR相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Sudden-onset restless legs syndrome due to acute cerebral hemorrhage The role of serum subfatin levels in the diagnosis of epileptic seizures: A case-control study Evaluating maternal mortality, risk factors, and emergency c-section timing in polytrauma pregnant patients Best practices for critically ill patients boarding in the emergency department: A Delphi study Comparison of neck-extended and modified ramped positions for locating the cricothyroid membrane in obese anesthetized patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1