Development and validation of the eHealth Literacy and Use Scale (eHLUS) to measure medical app literacy

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.057
J. Stephan , J. Gehrmann , J.C. Dehner , A. Stullich , M. Richter
{"title":"Development and validation of the eHealth Literacy and Use Scale (eHLUS) to measure medical app literacy","authors":"J. Stephan ,&nbsp;J. Gehrmann ,&nbsp;J.C. Dehner ,&nbsp;A. Stullich ,&nbsp;M. Richter","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to develop and validate the eHealth Literacy and Use Scale (eHLUS), a German assessment tool designed to measure health literacy in the context of using medical apps. This scale enhances traditional eHealth literacy tools by focusing on the unique requirements of medical app use, such as integration into everyday life, and self-efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This study employed a mixed-method design.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The development of the eHLUS involved a thorough literature review, expert interviews, and psychometric evaluation in a real-world environment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The eHLUS, consisting of 14 items across three dimensions, was designed for a nuanced assessment of eHealth literacy in medical apps. Psychometric evaluation data were gathered from 127 participants at two time points (n<sub>t1</sub> = 117; n<sub>t2</sub> = 62). The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.913 and a McDonald's omega of 0.911. A mean completion time of 2.2 min underscores its practical applicability. Retest reliability was confirmed in 52 matched cases, affirming the scale's stability. Principal component analysis revealed three dimensions: autonomous use and technical access, eHealth engagement, and eHealth literacy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings demonstrate the suitability of eHLUS for assessing individuals' abilities to effectively use medical apps, highlighting its importance in research and healthcare. The evaluation of the scale, along with expert interviews, underscores both its necessity and feasibility. The eHLUS captures eHealth literacy and its associated determinants within the context of medical app use, contributing to the optimization of patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"240 ","pages":"Pages 27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625000265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to develop and validate the eHealth Literacy and Use Scale (eHLUS), a German assessment tool designed to measure health literacy in the context of using medical apps. This scale enhances traditional eHealth literacy tools by focusing on the unique requirements of medical app use, such as integration into everyday life, and self-efficacy.

Study design

This study employed a mixed-method design.

Methods

The development of the eHLUS involved a thorough literature review, expert interviews, and psychometric evaluation in a real-world environment.

Results

The eHLUS, consisting of 14 items across three dimensions, was designed for a nuanced assessment of eHealth literacy in medical apps. Psychometric evaluation data were gathered from 127 participants at two time points (nt1 = 117; nt2 = 62). The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.913 and a McDonald's omega of 0.911. A mean completion time of 2.2 min underscores its practical applicability. Retest reliability was confirmed in 52 matched cases, affirming the scale's stability. Principal component analysis revealed three dimensions: autonomous use and technical access, eHealth engagement, and eHealth literacy.

Conclusion

The findings demonstrate the suitability of eHLUS for assessing individuals' abilities to effectively use medical apps, highlighting its importance in research and healthcare. The evaluation of the scale, along with expert interviews, underscores both its necessity and feasibility. The eHLUS captures eHealth literacy and its associated determinants within the context of medical app use, contributing to the optimization of patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
期刊最新文献
Inequalities in epilepsy mortality: A decade-long analysis of insured versus uninsured adults in Mexico Preterm birth and public health challenges: Incidence and risk factors Early life factors and dementia risk: A study of adverse childhood experiences and later-life cognition and behaviour Association between health literacy and risk of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Spatiotemporal distribution and time-series analysis of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Chongqing municipality, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1