Development and validation of the eHealth Literacy and Use Scale (eHLUS) to measure medical app literacy

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.057
J. Stephan , J. Gehrmann , J.C. Dehner , A. Stullich , M. Richter
{"title":"Development and validation of the eHealth Literacy and Use Scale (eHLUS) to measure medical app literacy","authors":"J. Stephan ,&nbsp;J. Gehrmann ,&nbsp;J.C. Dehner ,&nbsp;A. Stullich ,&nbsp;M. Richter","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to develop and validate the eHealth Literacy and Use Scale (eHLUS), a German assessment tool designed to measure health literacy in the context of using medical apps. This scale enhances traditional eHealth literacy tools by focusing on the unique requirements of medical app use, such as integration into everyday life, and self-efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This study employed a mixed-method design.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The development of the eHLUS involved a thorough literature review, expert interviews, and psychometric evaluation in a real-world environment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The eHLUS, consisting of 14 items across three dimensions, was designed for a nuanced assessment of eHealth literacy in medical apps. Psychometric evaluation data were gathered from 127 participants at two time points (n<sub>t1</sub> = 117; n<sub>t2</sub> = 62). The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.913 and a McDonald's omega of 0.911. A mean completion time of 2.2 min underscores its practical applicability. Retest reliability was confirmed in 52 matched cases, affirming the scale's stability. Principal component analysis revealed three dimensions: autonomous use and technical access, eHealth engagement, and eHealth literacy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings demonstrate the suitability of eHLUS for assessing individuals' abilities to effectively use medical apps, highlighting its importance in research and healthcare. The evaluation of the scale, along with expert interviews, underscores both its necessity and feasibility. The eHLUS captures eHealth literacy and its associated determinants within the context of medical app use, contributing to the optimization of patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"240 ","pages":"Pages 27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625000265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to develop and validate the eHealth Literacy and Use Scale (eHLUS), a German assessment tool designed to measure health literacy in the context of using medical apps. This scale enhances traditional eHealth literacy tools by focusing on the unique requirements of medical app use, such as integration into everyday life, and self-efficacy.

Study design

This study employed a mixed-method design.

Methods

The development of the eHLUS involved a thorough literature review, expert interviews, and psychometric evaluation in a real-world environment.

Results

The eHLUS, consisting of 14 items across three dimensions, was designed for a nuanced assessment of eHealth literacy in medical apps. Psychometric evaluation data were gathered from 127 participants at two time points (nt1 = 117; nt2 = 62). The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.913 and a McDonald's omega of 0.911. A mean completion time of 2.2 min underscores its practical applicability. Retest reliability was confirmed in 52 matched cases, affirming the scale's stability. Principal component analysis revealed three dimensions: autonomous use and technical access, eHealth engagement, and eHealth literacy.

Conclusion

The findings demonstrate the suitability of eHLUS for assessing individuals' abilities to effectively use medical apps, highlighting its importance in research and healthcare. The evaluation of the scale, along with expert interviews, underscores both its necessity and feasibility. The eHLUS captures eHealth literacy and its associated determinants within the context of medical app use, contributing to the optimization of patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子健康素养和使用量表(eHLUS)的开发和验证,以衡量医疗应用程序的素养。
目的:本研究旨在开发和验证电子健康素养和使用量表(eHLUS),这是一种德国评估工具,旨在衡量使用医疗应用程序背景下的健康素养。该量表通过关注医疗应用程序使用的独特要求,如融入日常生活和自我效能,增强了传统的电子健康素养工具。研究设计:本研究采用混合方法设计。方法:eHLUS的开发包括全面的文献综述,专家访谈和在现实世界环境中的心理测量评估。结果:eHLUS由14个项目组成,横跨三个维度,旨在对医疗应用程序中的电子健康素养进行细致入微的评估。在两个时间点收集127名参与者的心理测量评估数据(nt1 = 117;nt2 = 62)。量表具有良好的内部一致性,Cronbach's alpha为0.913,McDonald's omega为0.911。平均完井时间为2.2分钟,突出了其实用性。在52例匹配病例中确认了重测信度,确认了量表的稳定性。主成分分析揭示了三个维度:自主使用和技术获取、电子健康参与和电子健康素养。结论:研究结果证明了ehus用于评估个人有效使用医疗应用程序的能力的适用性,突出了其在研究和医疗保健中的重要性。对比额表的评价以及专家访谈都强调了它的必要性和可行性。eHLUS捕获了医疗应用程序使用背景下的电子卫生素养及其相关决定因素,有助于优化患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
期刊最新文献
Operationalisation and findings of a First Few X (FFX) investigation of early mpox clade Ib cases and their close contacts in the United Kingdom Health effects of employment initiation and retirement in later life among Japanese older adults: A longitudinal study Healthcare practitioners’ engagement with non-specialists: A scoping review Effectiveness of tailored public health messages for vulnerable populations: A randomised controlled trial Comparing the riskiness and determinants of non-adherence to five quarantine and isolation guidelines: A dynamic cohort study during COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1