Preferences for breast cancer screening: Results of a discrete choice experiment

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.010
Na Xiao , Menghao Yang , Lingli Zhang , Ruixia Wang , Jing Chen
{"title":"Preferences for breast cancer screening: Results of a discrete choice experiment","authors":"Na Xiao ,&nbsp;Menghao Yang ,&nbsp;Lingli Zhang ,&nbsp;Ruixia Wang ,&nbsp;Jing Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the preferences of breast cancer patients in China for screening services using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and latent class modeling (LCM). The findings are intended to inform the development of more patient-centered screening programs.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A cross-sectional, hospital-based survey employing discrete choice experiment methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 278 breast cancer patients were recruited from the Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery at a tertiary hospital in Guizhou Province. The study evaluated key attributes of screening services, including screening frequency, medical staff experience, referral sources, and out-of-pocket costs, through a DCE questionnaire. A mixed logit model was applied to assess overall patient preferences, while LCM was used to explore heterogeneity among patient subgroups. The development of the DCE questionnaire involved focus group discussions to ensure the relevance of attributes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis revealed that screening frequency, medical staff experience, and out-of-pocket costs were the most significant factors influencing patient preferences. Patients exhibited a strong preference for annual screenings (β = −1.622, p &lt; 0.001) and for screening by experienced medical staff (β = 2.216, p &lt; 0.001). Additionally, lower out-of-pocket costs significantly enhanced willingness to participate (β = −0.211, p &lt; 0.05). LCM analysis identified two distinct patient subgroups: “process-driven” patients, who prioritized lower costs and multi-channel referral options, and “efficiency-driven” patients, who valued timely service and experienced staff.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study emphasizes the diverse preferences of breast cancer patients for screening services and suggests that personalized screening programs could better meet the needs of different patient subgroups. Developing flexible, patient-centered screening programs will be essential to improving participation and satisfaction with breast cancer screening in China. Practical challenges in implementing such personalized approaches should be considered in future policy development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"240 ","pages":"Pages 33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625000319","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the preferences of breast cancer patients in China for screening services using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and latent class modeling (LCM). The findings are intended to inform the development of more patient-centered screening programs.

Study design

A cross-sectional, hospital-based survey employing discrete choice experiment methodology.

Methods

A total of 278 breast cancer patients were recruited from the Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery at a tertiary hospital in Guizhou Province. The study evaluated key attributes of screening services, including screening frequency, medical staff experience, referral sources, and out-of-pocket costs, through a DCE questionnaire. A mixed logit model was applied to assess overall patient preferences, while LCM was used to explore heterogeneity among patient subgroups. The development of the DCE questionnaire involved focus group discussions to ensure the relevance of attributes.

Results

The analysis revealed that screening frequency, medical staff experience, and out-of-pocket costs were the most significant factors influencing patient preferences. Patients exhibited a strong preference for annual screenings (β = −1.622, p < 0.001) and for screening by experienced medical staff (β = 2.216, p < 0.001). Additionally, lower out-of-pocket costs significantly enhanced willingness to participate (β = −0.211, p < 0.05). LCM analysis identified two distinct patient subgroups: “process-driven” patients, who prioritized lower costs and multi-channel referral options, and “efficiency-driven” patients, who valued timely service and experienced staff.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the diverse preferences of breast cancer patients for screening services and suggests that personalized screening programs could better meet the needs of different patient subgroups. Developing flexible, patient-centered screening programs will be essential to improving participation and satisfaction with breast cancer screening in China. Practical challenges in implementing such personalized approaches should be considered in future policy development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌筛查的偏好:离散选择实验的结果。
目的:本研究旨在通过离散选择实验(DCE)和潜在分类模型(LCM)评估中国乳腺癌患者对筛查服务的偏好。研究结果旨在为更多以患者为中心的筛查项目的发展提供信息。研究设计:采用离散选择实验方法,以医院为基础的横断面调查。方法:选取贵州省某三级医院甲状腺乳腺外科278例乳腺癌患者作为研究对象。该研究通过DCE问卷评估了筛查服务的关键属性,包括筛查频率、医务人员经验、转诊来源和自付费用。混合logit模型用于评估患者总体偏好,而LCM用于探索患者亚组之间的异质性。DCE问卷的开发涉及焦点小组讨论,以确保属性的相关性。结果:分析显示,筛查频率、医务人员经验和自付费用是影响患者偏好的最重要因素。结论:本研究强调了乳腺癌患者对筛查服务的不同偏好,个性化筛查方案可以更好地满足不同患者亚群的需求。制定灵活的、以患者为中心的筛查方案对于提高中国乳腺癌筛查的参与度和满意度至关重要。在今后制定政策时应考虑到执行这种个性化办法的实际挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
期刊最新文献
An overview of artificial intelligence approaches for automating evidence synthesis Analysis of adult non-communicable disease (NCD) screening data in Uzbekistan using the UZ-SPEED NCD tool A cluster-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effects of a blended care intervention in pregnancy and postpartum on weight, health behaviour, and mental health in women with low socio-economic status Exploring the validity of using the English index of Multiple Deprivation as a proxy for individual or household income The hidden burden of disease in Brazil: A quantitative comparison between official notifications and modeled estimates from the Global Burden of Disease study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1