The Role of IgE Sensitization in Acute FPIES: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2025.01.016
Aisling K. Phelan RD, MS , Sonsoles Infante MD, PhD , Simona Barni MD , Ulugbek Nurmatov MD, MS, MPH, MBA, PhD , Robert J. Boyle MD, PhD , Marta Vazquez-Ortiz MD, PhD
{"title":"The Role of IgE Sensitization in Acute FPIES: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Aisling K. Phelan RD, MS ,&nbsp;Sonsoles Infante MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Simona Barni MD ,&nbsp;Ulugbek Nurmatov MD, MS, MPH, MBA, PhD ,&nbsp;Robert J. Boyle MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marta Vazquez-Ortiz MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Evidence on the role of immunoglobulin E (IgE) sensitization in acute food protein–induced enterocolitis syndrome (atypical FPIES) is limited. Initial reports claimed association with persistent disease; however, recent studies have not replicated this.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically review the relationship between sensitization to the culprit food(s) in acute FPIES and the outcome of follow-up oral food challenges. To assess the rates of sensitization, seroconversion (ie, switch from negative tests to sensitization), and phenotype switch to IgE-mediated food allergy over time in individuals with acute FPIES.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Systematic review searching 10 databases. Studies of children and adults with an acute FPIES diagnosis assessing IgE sensitization to a culprit food at onset or follow-up measured by skin prick or serological test were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1,830 studies identified, 53 were eligible including 3,514 participants. Ten studies had an analytical design assessing whether sensitization was associated with disease persistence, with 4 showing an association and 6 showing no association. In individuals with acute FPIES, the sensitization rate was 9.8% (95% confidence interval [95% CI 7.4%–12.1%; 34 studies, 2,587 participants, I<sup>2</sup> = 82%); the frequency of seroconversion was 1.1% (95% CI 0.1%–2.1%; 9 studies, 673 participants, I<sup>2</sup> = 32%); and phenotype switch occurred in 1.1% (95% CI 0.4%–1.7%; 14 studies, 935 participants, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and 13% (95% CI 5.5%–20.5%, 12 studies, 93 participants; I<sup>2</sup> = 18%) of sensitized participants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We did not find consistent evidence for the relationship between IgE sensitization and FPIES persistence. We found phenotype switch to IgE-mediated food allergy is uncommon in acute FPIES. An IgE sensitization in FPIES does not have a clear relationship with clinical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 861-884.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219825000601","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Evidence on the role of immunoglobulin E (IgE) sensitization in acute food protein–induced enterocolitis syndrome (atypical FPIES) is limited. Initial reports claimed association with persistent disease; however, recent studies have not replicated this.

Objective

To systematically review the relationship between sensitization to the culprit food(s) in acute FPIES and the outcome of follow-up oral food challenges. To assess the rates of sensitization, seroconversion (ie, switch from negative tests to sensitization), and phenotype switch to IgE-mediated food allergy over time in individuals with acute FPIES.

Methods

Systematic review searching 10 databases. Studies of children and adults with an acute FPIES diagnosis assessing IgE sensitization to a culprit food at onset or follow-up measured by skin prick or serological test were included.

Results

Of 1,830 studies identified, 53 were eligible including 3,514 participants. Ten studies had an analytical design assessing whether sensitization was associated with disease persistence, with 4 showing an association and 6 showing no association. In individuals with acute FPIES, the sensitization rate was 9.8% (95% confidence interval [95% CI 7.4%–12.1%; 34 studies, 2,587 participants, I2 = 82%); the frequency of seroconversion was 1.1% (95% CI 0.1%–2.1%; 9 studies, 673 participants, I2 = 32%); and phenotype switch occurred in 1.1% (95% CI 0.4%–1.7%; 14 studies, 935 participants, I2 = 0%) and 13% (95% CI 5.5%–20.5%, 12 studies, 93 participants; I2 = 18%) of sensitized participants.

Conclusions

We did not find consistent evidence for the relationship between IgE sensitization and FPIES persistence. We found phenotype switch to IgE-mediated food allergy is uncommon in acute FPIES. An IgE sensitization in FPIES does not have a clear relationship with clinical outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IgE致敏在急性FPIES中的作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:关于IgE致敏在急性食物蛋白性小肠结肠炎综合征(“非典型FPIES”)中的作用的证据有限。最初的报告声称与持续性疾病有关,但最近的研究并没有重复这一点。目的:系统回顾急性FPIES患者对罪魁祸首食物的致敏与后续口腔食物挑战结果之间的关系。评估急性FPIES患者随着时间的推移致敏率、血清转换率(即从阴性试验转向致敏)和表型转换率至ige介导的食物过敏。方法:系统回顾检索10个数据库。研究纳入了急性FPIES诊断的儿童和成人,在发病或随访时通过皮肤刺痛或血清学测试评估对罪魁祸首食物的IgE敏感性。结果:在确定的1830项研究中,53项符合条件,包括3514名受试者。10项研究进行了分析设计,评估致敏性是否与疾病持续性相关,其中4项显示有关联,6项显示无关联。在急性FPIES患者中,致敏率为9.8% (95% CI: 7.4-12.1%;34项研究,2587名受试者,I2 = 82%);血清转换频率为1.1% (95% CI: 0.1-2.1%;9项研究,673名受试者,I2=32%);表型转换发生率为1.1% (95% CI: 0.4-1.7%;14项研究,935名受试者,I2 =0%)和13% (95% CI: 5.5-20.5%, 12项研究,93名受试者;I2=18%)。结论:我们没有发现一致的证据表明IgE致敏与FPIES持续存在之间的关系。我们发现表型转换到ige介导的食物过敏在急性FPIES中并不常见。FPIES患者的ige致敏与临床结果没有明确的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
9.60%
发文量
683
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases. This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders. The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Refractory Orbital Kimura Disease Successfully Treated With Dupilumab. Attitudes and practices regarding dosing interval extension of biologics in severe asthma: a nationwide survey and real-world data from the Dutch RAPSODI registry. Enteropathy in CVID. Correction Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1