{"title":"Pharmacogenetic Testing in Admixed Populations: Frequency of the AMR PGx Working Group Tier 1 Variant Alleles in Brazilians.","authors":"Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the frequency distribution of Tier 1 pharmacogenetic variants of the Association for Molecular Pathology Pharmacogenomics Working Group Recommendations in two large (>1.000 individuals) cohorts of the admixed Brazilian population, and in patients from the Brazilian Public Health System enrolled in pharmacogenetic trials. Three Tier 1 variants, all in DPYD, were consistently absent, which may justify their non-inclusion in genotyping panels for Brazilians; 13 variants had frequency < 1.0% and the remaining 21 variants ranged in frequency from 1.2% (NUDT15*3) to 76.4% (CYP3A5*3). The frequency of some CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 and VKORC1 variants differed significantly across the three major \"race/Color\" categories of the Brazilian Census (White, Brown and Black), as a consequence of different proportions of individual European and African ancestry. However, it is recommended that selection of variants for inclusion in pharmacogenetic testing panels and implementation of pharmacogenetic-informed dosing guidelines for Brazilians should not be determined by race/Color categories. Native Americans (0.4% of the Brazilian population), virtually absent from the study cohorts, display wide inter-ethnic diversity in frequency of some Tier 1 variants (e.g. NUDT15*3 and TPMT*3A) and/or differ markedly from non-Indigenous people in frequency of some variant alleles (e.g. CYP2C19*17). Collectively, the data support the notion that population diversity must be taken into account on the design and implementation of pharmacogenetic testing panels.</p>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.12.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines the frequency distribution of Tier 1 pharmacogenetic variants of the Association for Molecular Pathology Pharmacogenomics Working Group Recommendations in two large (>1.000 individuals) cohorts of the admixed Brazilian population, and in patients from the Brazilian Public Health System enrolled in pharmacogenetic trials. Three Tier 1 variants, all in DPYD, were consistently absent, which may justify their non-inclusion in genotyping panels for Brazilians; 13 variants had frequency < 1.0% and the remaining 21 variants ranged in frequency from 1.2% (NUDT15*3) to 76.4% (CYP3A5*3). The frequency of some CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 and VKORC1 variants differed significantly across the three major "race/Color" categories of the Brazilian Census (White, Brown and Black), as a consequence of different proportions of individual European and African ancestry. However, it is recommended that selection of variants for inclusion in pharmacogenetic testing panels and implementation of pharmacogenetic-informed dosing guidelines for Brazilians should not be determined by race/Color categories. Native Americans (0.4% of the Brazilian population), virtually absent from the study cohorts, display wide inter-ethnic diversity in frequency of some Tier 1 variants (e.g. NUDT15*3 and TPMT*3A) and/or differ markedly from non-Indigenous people in frequency of some variant alleles (e.g. CYP2C19*17). Collectively, the data support the notion that population diversity must be taken into account on the design and implementation of pharmacogenetic testing panels.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.