Management of renal cell carcinoma with ablation in comparison to nephrectomy: A 5-year analysis of inpatient procedural data to evaluate utilization disparities in the United States

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110412
Tarig S. Elhakim , Taha Lodhi , Wilton Fidelis , Allison Brea , Ana Mort , Maryam Mohagheghtabar , Azadeh Tabari , Samuel R. Davis , Raul N. Uppot , Ronald S. Arellano , Michael Dezube , Dania Daye
{"title":"Management of renal cell carcinoma with ablation in comparison to nephrectomy: A 5-year analysis of inpatient procedural data to evaluate utilization disparities in the United States","authors":"Tarig S. Elhakim ,&nbsp;Taha Lodhi ,&nbsp;Wilton Fidelis ,&nbsp;Allison Brea ,&nbsp;Ana Mort ,&nbsp;Maryam Mohagheghtabar ,&nbsp;Azadeh Tabari ,&nbsp;Samuel R. Davis ,&nbsp;Raul N. Uppot ,&nbsp;Ronald S. Arellano ,&nbsp;Michael Dezube ,&nbsp;Dania Daye","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To perform a nationwide analysis of ablation compared to partial and total nephrectomy for the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to evaluate utilization trends and disparities in the USA.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The 2016–2020 National Inpatient Sample was analyzed. Using ICD-10, we identified the diagnosis of RCC then analyzed the utilization trends of ablation and nephrectomies (both partial and complete). To determine if any disparities exist, a multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the influence of age, sex, race, income, payer, illness severity, geographical location, and hospital factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From the 183,885 inpatient encounters with RCC, 3045 (1.65 %) underwent ablation, 70,080 (38.1 %) underwent partial nephrectomy, and 110,760 (60.2 %) underwent total nephrectomy. There was no significant difference in the sex between all groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean age of those undergoing ablation (67.30, SD = 12.05) versus those undergoing partial nephrectomy (59.27, SD = 13.26) and total nephrectomy (62.22, SD = 14.42) (OR: 1.04, 95%CI: 1.03–1.05, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Compared to White patients, Hispanic and African Americans were more likely to undergo ablation versus nephrectomy (OR: 1.52, 95%CI: 1.16–1.98, <em>P</em> = 0.002 and OR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.28–2.13, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, respectively). Compared to patients on private insurance, those on Medicaid and Medicare were more likely to have ablation than nephrectomy (OR: 1.85, 95%CI: 1.31–2.61, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, and OR: 1.62, 95%CI: 1.26–2.08, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, patients were less likely to undergo ablation than nephrectomies in 2020 compared to 2016 (OR: 0.69, 95%CI: 0.53–0.90, <em>P</em> = 0.006).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Since 2016, there has been a decreasing trend in the use of ablation for treating RCC in hospitalized patients. Those undergoing ablation tend to be older, African American, Hispanic, and insured by Medicare or Medicaid. Further research is needed to ensure equitable access for optimal treatment of RCC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 110412"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125000129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To perform a nationwide analysis of ablation compared to partial and total nephrectomy for the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to evaluate utilization trends and disparities in the USA.

Materials and methods

The 2016–2020 National Inpatient Sample was analyzed. Using ICD-10, we identified the diagnosis of RCC then analyzed the utilization trends of ablation and nephrectomies (both partial and complete). To determine if any disparities exist, a multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the influence of age, sex, race, income, payer, illness severity, geographical location, and hospital factors.

Results

From the 183,885 inpatient encounters with RCC, 3045 (1.65 %) underwent ablation, 70,080 (38.1 %) underwent partial nephrectomy, and 110,760 (60.2 %) underwent total nephrectomy. There was no significant difference in the sex between all groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean age of those undergoing ablation (67.30, SD = 12.05) versus those undergoing partial nephrectomy (59.27, SD = 13.26) and total nephrectomy (62.22, SD = 14.42) (OR: 1.04, 95%CI: 1.03–1.05, P < 0.001). Compared to White patients, Hispanic and African Americans were more likely to undergo ablation versus nephrectomy (OR: 1.52, 95%CI: 1.16–1.98, P = 0.002 and OR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.28–2.13, P < 0.001, respectively). Compared to patients on private insurance, those on Medicaid and Medicare were more likely to have ablation than nephrectomy (OR: 1.85, 95%CI: 1.31–2.61, P < 0.001, and OR: 1.62, 95%CI: 1.26–2.08, P < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, patients were less likely to undergo ablation than nephrectomies in 2020 compared to 2016 (OR: 0.69, 95%CI: 0.53–0.90, P = 0.006).

Conclusion

Since 2016, there has been a decreasing trend in the use of ablation for treating RCC in hospitalized patients. Those undergoing ablation tend to be older, African American, Hispanic, and insured by Medicare or Medicaid. Further research is needed to ensure equitable access for optimal treatment of RCC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与肾切除术相比,消融治疗肾细胞癌:一项评估美国5年住院手术数据差异的分析。
目的:开展一项全国性的分析,比较消融与部分和全部肾切除术在治疗肾细胞癌(RCC)中的应用趋势和差异。材料与方法:对2016-2020年全国住院患者样本进行分析。使用ICD-10,我们确定了肾细胞癌的诊断,并分析了消融和肾切除术(部分和完全)的应用趋势。为了确定是否存在差异,采用多变量logistic回归来评估年龄、性别、种族、收入、付款人、疾病严重程度、地理位置和医院因素的影响。结果:在183,885例RCC住院患者中,3045例(1.65%)接受了消融术,70,080例(38.1%)接受了部分肾切除术,110,760例(60.2%)接受了全肾切除术。各组间在性别上无显著差异。行消融术患者的平均年龄(67.30岁,SD = 12.05)与行部分肾切除术患者(59.27岁,SD = 13.26)和全肾切除术患者(62.22岁,SD = 14.42)比较,差异有统计学意义(OR: 1.04, 95%CI: 1.03-1.05, P)。结论:2016年以来,住院患者使用消融术治疗肾细胞癌呈下降趋势。接受消融术的患者往往年龄较大,非裔美国人,西班牙裔,并有医疗保险或医疗补助。需要进一步的研究,以确保公平获得最佳治疗碾压砼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
期刊最新文献
CTA of the adult native aorta: Everything you wanted to know (but were never told) Comment on “AI-assisted chest radiograph interpretation enhances diagnostic confidence and standardizes diagnostic accuracy across radiologists” Third and fourth branchial cleft cysts – A 25-year institutional experience of imaging detection and pathologic diagnosis Extrinsic versus intrinsic stenosis as a means of clinical triage for patients with symptomatic dural venous sinus stenosis Comment on ‘Limited performance of ChatGPT-4v and ChatGPT-4o in image-based core radiology cases’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1