Fenestrated Anaconda Endograft for the Treatment of Complex Aortic Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1177/15266028251313947
Georgios I Karaolanis, Konstantinos Kotopoulos, Silvan Jungi, Drosos Kotelis, Vladimir Makaloski
{"title":"Fenestrated Anaconda Endograft for the Treatment of Complex Aortic Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Georgios I Karaolanis, Konstantinos Kotopoulos, Silvan Jungi, Drosos Kotelis, Vladimir Makaloski","doi":"10.1177/15266028251313947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of Anaconda fenestrated endograft for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic search of all the literature reported until May 2024 was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The pooled 30-day mortality rate, technical success rate, reintervention rate as well as bridging stent occlusion rate, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed or random effect methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 526 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 6 were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 782 patients (89% male) were identified among the eligible studies. The pooled 30-day mortality rate was 4.8% (95% CI, 3.5%-6.5%) while the reintervention rate was 7.9% (95% CI, 4.3%-14.1%) and 10.2% (95% CI, 5.8%-17.4%) in the early and late period, respectively. The pooled bridging stents occlusion was 2.7% (95% CI, 1.5%-4.9%) during 30 days and 3.5% (95% CI, 1.6%-7.6%) during follow-up. Overall technical success was 86.1% (95% CI, 62.9%-95.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the Anaconda fenestrated endograft in treatment of complex aortic aneurysms involving the abdominal visceral vessels has low early and late mortality. Low rate of bridging stent occlusion occurs early postoperatively and during follow-up, mostly involving the renal arteries. Reinterventions during follow-up are mostly induced by limb occlusion. Lower early technical success rate is explained by the presence of a type Ia endoleak on final angiography, which however resolves spontaneously early postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>The present systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies provide evidence-based data regarding the safety and efficacy of the fenestrated Anaconda device for the primary treatment of cAAA in the perioperative period and at long-term follow-up. Six studies with an overall 782 patients were included. The technical success in patients with cAAA treated with Anaconda fenestrated endograft was 86% while the reintervention rate was 7.9% and 10.2 during the perioperative and long-term follow up period. The pooled 30-day occlusion rate for the bridging stents was 2.7% while the late pooled occlusion rate for the bridging stents among the studies was 3.5%. The use of the Anaconda fenestrated endograft in treatment of complex aortic aneurysms involving the abdominal visceral vessels seems feasible with promising outcomes. The lower early technical success is obscured by the presence of type Ia endoleak which, resolves spontaneously early postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251313947"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251313947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of Anaconda fenestrated endograft for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA).

Material and methods: A systematic search of all the literature reported until May 2024 was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The pooled 30-day mortality rate, technical success rate, reintervention rate as well as bridging stent occlusion rate, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed or random effect methods.

Results: A total of 526 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 6 were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 782 patients (89% male) were identified among the eligible studies. The pooled 30-day mortality rate was 4.8% (95% CI, 3.5%-6.5%) while the reintervention rate was 7.9% (95% CI, 4.3%-14.1%) and 10.2% (95% CI, 5.8%-17.4%) in the early and late period, respectively. The pooled bridging stents occlusion was 2.7% (95% CI, 1.5%-4.9%) during 30 days and 3.5% (95% CI, 1.6%-7.6%) during follow-up. Overall technical success was 86.1% (95% CI, 62.9%-95.8%).

Conclusions: The use of the Anaconda fenestrated endograft in treatment of complex aortic aneurysms involving the abdominal visceral vessels has low early and late mortality. Low rate of bridging stent occlusion occurs early postoperatively and during follow-up, mostly involving the renal arteries. Reinterventions during follow-up are mostly induced by limb occlusion. Lower early technical success rate is explained by the presence of a type Ia endoleak on final angiography, which however resolves spontaneously early postoperatively.

Clinical impact: The present systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies provide evidence-based data regarding the safety and efficacy of the fenestrated Anaconda device for the primary treatment of cAAA in the perioperative period and at long-term follow-up. Six studies with an overall 782 patients were included. The technical success in patients with cAAA treated with Anaconda fenestrated endograft was 86% while the reintervention rate was 7.9% and 10.2 during the perioperative and long-term follow up period. The pooled 30-day occlusion rate for the bridging stents was 2.7% while the late pooled occlusion rate for the bridging stents among the studies was 3.5%. The use of the Anaconda fenestrated endograft in treatment of complex aortic aneurysms involving the abdominal visceral vessels seems feasible with promising outcomes. The lower early technical success is obscured by the presence of type Ia endoleak which, resolves spontaneously early postoperatively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开窗水蟒内移植物治疗复杂主动脉瘤:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:对水蚺开窗腔内移植治疗复杂腹主动脉瘤(cAAA)的疗效进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。材料和方法:根据PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南,对2024年5月之前报告的所有文献进行系统检索。采用固定效应或随机效应方法估计合并的30天死亡率、技术成功率、再干预率和搭桥支架闭塞率以及相应的95%置信区间(ci)。结果:通过初始搜索策略共确定了526个研究标题,其中6个被认为符合纳入meta分析的条件。在符合条件的研究中,共有782例患者(89%为男性)被确定。合并30天死亡率为4.8% (95% CI, 3.5%-6.5%),早期和晚期的再干预率分别为7.9% (95% CI, 4.3%-14.1%)和10.2% (95% CI, 5.8%-17.4%)。30天内合并桥支架闭塞率为2.7% (95% CI, 1.5%-4.9%),随访期间为3.5% (95% CI, 1.6%-7.6%)。总体技术成功率为86.1% (95% CI, 62.9%-95.8%)。结论:采用开窗水蚺腔内移植治疗累及腹腔内脏血管的复杂主动脉瘤,早期和晚期死亡率低。桥式支架闭塞发生率低,发生于术后早期及随访期间,多累及肾动脉。随访期间的再干预多由肢体闭塞引起。早期技术成功率较低的原因是最终血管造影时存在Ia型内漏,但术后早期自发消退。临床影响:本研究对观察性研究进行了系统回顾和meta分析,提供了关于开窗Anaconda装置在围手术期和长期随访中用于cAAA初级治疗的安全性和有效性的循证数据。6项研究共纳入782例患者。在围手术期和长期随访期间,Anaconda开窗内移植术治疗cAAA患者的技术成功率为86%,再干预率分别为7.9%和10.2%。在这些研究中,桥架的30天合并闭塞率为2.7%,而桥架的后期合并闭塞率为3.5%。使用Anaconda开窗内移植物治疗累及腹部内脏血管的复杂主动脉瘤似乎是可行的,并且有希望的结果。早期较低的技术成功率被Ia型内漏的存在所掩盖,后者在术后早期自然消退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
Inter-Center Radiation Variability in CO2-Guided EVAR: Lessons From the Zero Iodine Contrast Multicenter Prospective Study. Patient Selection and Technical Considerations for Electrocautery Septotomy in the Management of Aortic Dissection. Aortic Calcification Severity Predicts Unfavorable Anatomy and Adverse Outcomes in Type B Aortic Dissection. Technical Success and Clinical Outcomes of Pedal Serration Angioplasty for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. Predictors of Successful Extravascular Ultrasound-Guided Wiring for Femoropopliteal Chronic Total Occlusions Within 30 Minutes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1