Fenestrated Anaconda Endograft for the Treatment of Complex Aortic Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1177/15266028251313947
Georgios I Karaolanis, Konstantinos Kotopoulos, Silvan Jungi, Drosos Kotelis, Vladimir Makaloski
{"title":"Fenestrated Anaconda Endograft for the Treatment of Complex Aortic Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Georgios I Karaolanis, Konstantinos Kotopoulos, Silvan Jungi, Drosos Kotelis, Vladimir Makaloski","doi":"10.1177/15266028251313947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of Anaconda fenestrated endograft for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic search of all the literature reported until May 2024 was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The pooled 30-day mortality rate, technical success rate, reintervention rate as well as bridging stent occlusion rate, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed or random effect methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 526 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 6 were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 782 patients (89% male) were identified among the eligible studies. The pooled 30-day mortality rate was 4.8% (95% CI, 3.5%-6.5%) while the reintervention rate was 7.9% (95% CI, 4.3%-14.1%) and 10.2% (95% CI, 5.8%-17.4%) in the early and late period, respectively. The pooled bridging stents occlusion was 2.7% (95% CI, 1.5%-4.9%) during 30 days and 3.5% (95% CI, 1.6%-7.6%) during follow-up. Overall technical success was 86.1% (95% CI, 62.9%-95.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the Anaconda fenestrated endograft in treatment of complex aortic aneurysms involving the abdominal visceral vessels has low early and late mortality. Low rate of bridging stent occlusion occurs early postoperatively and during follow-up, mostly involving the renal arteries. Reinterventions during follow-up are mostly induced by limb occlusion. Lower early technical success rate is explained by the presence of a type Ia endoleak on final angiography, which however resolves spontaneously early postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>The present systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies provide evidence-based data regarding the safety and efficacy of the fenestrated Anaconda device for the primary treatment of cAAA in the perioperative period and at long-term follow-up. Six studies with an overall 782 patients were included. The technical success in patients with cAAA treated with Anaconda fenestrated endograft was 86% while the reintervention rate was 7.9% and 10.2 during the perioperative and long-term follow up period. The pooled 30-day occlusion rate for the bridging stents was 2.7% while the late pooled occlusion rate for the bridging stents among the studies was 3.5%. The use of the Anaconda fenestrated endograft in treatment of complex aortic aneurysms involving the abdominal visceral vessels seems feasible with promising outcomes. The lower early technical success is obscured by the presence of type Ia endoleak which, resolves spontaneously early postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251313947"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251313947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of Anaconda fenestrated endograft for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA).

Material and methods: A systematic search of all the literature reported until May 2024 was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The pooled 30-day mortality rate, technical success rate, reintervention rate as well as bridging stent occlusion rate, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed or random effect methods.

Results: A total of 526 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 6 were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 782 patients (89% male) were identified among the eligible studies. The pooled 30-day mortality rate was 4.8% (95% CI, 3.5%-6.5%) while the reintervention rate was 7.9% (95% CI, 4.3%-14.1%) and 10.2% (95% CI, 5.8%-17.4%) in the early and late period, respectively. The pooled bridging stents occlusion was 2.7% (95% CI, 1.5%-4.9%) during 30 days and 3.5% (95% CI, 1.6%-7.6%) during follow-up. Overall technical success was 86.1% (95% CI, 62.9%-95.8%).

Conclusions: The use of the Anaconda fenestrated endograft in treatment of complex aortic aneurysms involving the abdominal visceral vessels has low early and late mortality. Low rate of bridging stent occlusion occurs early postoperatively and during follow-up, mostly involving the renal arteries. Reinterventions during follow-up are mostly induced by limb occlusion. Lower early technical success rate is explained by the presence of a type Ia endoleak on final angiography, which however resolves spontaneously early postoperatively.

Clinical impact: The present systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies provide evidence-based data regarding the safety and efficacy of the fenestrated Anaconda device for the primary treatment of cAAA in the perioperative period and at long-term follow-up. Six studies with an overall 782 patients were included. The technical success in patients with cAAA treated with Anaconda fenestrated endograft was 86% while the reintervention rate was 7.9% and 10.2 during the perioperative and long-term follow up period. The pooled 30-day occlusion rate for the bridging stents was 2.7% while the late pooled occlusion rate for the bridging stents among the studies was 3.5%. The use of the Anaconda fenestrated endograft in treatment of complex aortic aneurysms involving the abdominal visceral vessels seems feasible with promising outcomes. The lower early technical success is obscured by the presence of type Ia endoleak which, resolves spontaneously early postoperatively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
Electrosurgical In Situ Fenestration of Aortic Endograft. Videolaparoscopic-Guided Saccography and Direct Sac Embolization After Standard EVAR. In Vitro Investigation of Microcatheter Behavior During Microsphere Injection in Transarterial Radioembolization. Gore Tag Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis in Acute Aortic Syndromes: A Case Series. Radiographic Characterization of Inferior Vena Cava and Its Reaction Following Filter Placement: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1