Public value and digital health: The example of guiding values in the national digital health strategy of France

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105794
Simon Lewerenz , Anne Moen , Henrique Martins
{"title":"Public value and digital health: The example of guiding values in the national digital health strategy of France","authors":"Simon Lewerenz ,&nbsp;Anne Moen ,&nbsp;Henrique Martins","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In the WHO European Region, 44 of 53 reporting Member States (MS) have a national digital health strategy (NDHS) or policy. Their formulation is heterogenous and evolving and should best reflect public common interest. This research aims to explore how a public value approach improves the relevance of digital health policies and services, increasing their capacity to better serve the diverse range of societal interests. It utilises the guiding values within the French NDHS as an example before discussing other digital health policies such as the European Heath Data Space.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Three homogenous focus group discussions were conducted in November and December 2023. Each focus group separately gathered distinct stakeholders: public clients, health professionals, private sector. 19 participants were included in the study. Data collection comprised live polling and semi-structured discussion. Results were analysed considering the pre-defined stakeholder groups and the values discussed during the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings reveal both technical and cultural challenges in digital health that highlight the need for adaptable frameworks across different contexts. Stakeholder insights informed a framework classifying public values into democratic and managerial categories, suggesting themes that may be relevant to digital health strategies in other national and regional settings.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Public value is discussed as a multidimensional concept, and the plurality of its perceptions give basis for tailored approaches to serve different value-beneficiaries comprehensively. We propose this values-based approach as a systematic model for supra-, sub-, and national scales and additional policy topics, beyond digital health strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study suggests that using a public value lens considering multiple perceptions is valuable for advancing digital health policy in a responsible and ethical manner. Such an approach could promote wider governance of and adoption of digital health. To evolve the framework, application in multiple and large ecosystems at different levels should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 105794"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505625000115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In the WHO European Region, 44 of 53 reporting Member States (MS) have a national digital health strategy (NDHS) or policy. Their formulation is heterogenous and evolving and should best reflect public common interest. This research aims to explore how a public value approach improves the relevance of digital health policies and services, increasing their capacity to better serve the diverse range of societal interests. It utilises the guiding values within the French NDHS as an example before discussing other digital health policies such as the European Heath Data Space.

Methods

Three homogenous focus group discussions were conducted in November and December 2023. Each focus group separately gathered distinct stakeholders: public clients, health professionals, private sector. 19 participants were included in the study. Data collection comprised live polling and semi-structured discussion. Results were analysed considering the pre-defined stakeholder groups and the values discussed during the study.

Results

Findings reveal both technical and cultural challenges in digital health that highlight the need for adaptable frameworks across different contexts. Stakeholder insights informed a framework classifying public values into democratic and managerial categories, suggesting themes that may be relevant to digital health strategies in other national and regional settings.

Discussion

Public value is discussed as a multidimensional concept, and the plurality of its perceptions give basis for tailored approaches to serve different value-beneficiaries comprehensively. We propose this values-based approach as a systematic model for supra-, sub-, and national scales and additional policy topics, beyond digital health strategies.

Conclusion

The study suggests that using a public value lens considering multiple perceptions is valuable for advancing digital health policy in a responsible and ethical manner. Such an approach could promote wider governance of and adoption of digital health. To evolve the framework, application in multiple and large ecosystems at different levels should be considered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共价值与数字卫生:法国国家数字卫生战略的指导价值范例。
在世卫组织欧洲区域,53个提交报告的会员国中有44个制定了国家数字卫生战略或政策。它们的表述是不同的和不断发展的,应该最好地反映公众的共同利益。本研究旨在探索公共价值方法如何提高数字卫生政策和服务的相关性,提高其更好地服务于各种社会利益的能力。在讨论欧洲卫生数据空间等其他数字卫生政策之前,它以法国国家卫生健康计划的指导价值为例。方法:于2023年11月和12月进行3次同质焦点小组讨论。每个焦点小组分别聚集了不同的利益攸关方:公共客户、卫生专业人员、私营部门。19名参与者参与了这项研究。数据收集包括实时投票和半结构化讨论。考虑到预定义的利益相关者群体和研究期间讨论的价值,分析了结果。结果:调查结果揭示了数字健康中的技术和文化挑战,强调需要在不同背景下建立适应性框架。利益攸关方的见解为将公共价值观分为民主和管理类别的框架提供了信息,并提出了可能与其他国家和区域环境中的数字卫生战略相关的主题。讨论:将公共价值作为一个多维度的概念进行讨论,其感知的多元性为量身定制的方法提供了基础,以全面服务不同的价值受益者。我们建议将这种基于价值观的方法作为一种系统模型,用于超越数字健康战略的上级、下级和国家规模以及其他政策主题。结论:该研究表明,使用考虑多种认知的公共价值视角对于以负责任和道德的方式推进数字卫生政策是有价值的。这种方法可以促进数字卫生的更广泛治理和采用。为进一步完善该框架,应考虑在不同层次的多个大型生态系统中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Research using smartwatches for the measurement of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep: A scoping review Characterizing nursing home care team communication via text messaging: A social network analysis Comparing large language models and human experts in interpreting MRI reports for personalized patient education Beyond the conventional: Artificial intelligence in identifying risk factors in sports injuries. A scoping review A visualized nurse-led ePRO system for chemotherapy toxicity: Content design and validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1