Therapy for Dupuytren's Disease (II): Collagenase Therapy vs. Limited Fasciectomy-A Long-Term Comparative Study.

IF 3.4 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Life-Basel Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.3390/life15010076
Nikolaus Wachtel, Francesca Romana Dingler, Constanze Kuhlmann, Sinan Mert, Elisabeth Maria Haas-Lützenberger, Verena Alt, Nicholas Moellhoff, Riccardo Giunta, Wolfram Demmer
{"title":"Therapy for Dupuytren's Disease (II): Collagenase Therapy vs. Limited Fasciectomy-A Long-Term Comparative Study.","authors":"Nikolaus Wachtel, Francesca Romana Dingler, Constanze Kuhlmann, Sinan Mert, Elisabeth Maria Haas-Lützenberger, Verena Alt, Nicholas Moellhoff, Riccardo Giunta, Wolfram Demmer","doi":"10.3390/life15010076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dupuytren's disease (DD) is a systemic connective tissue disorder of the palm, predominantly affecting men of Northern European or Caucasian origin over 55. In addition to conventional surgery, Dupuytren's contracture can be treated in a minimally invasive way by injecting bacterial collagenase into the cord. However, studies on the long-term success rate when compared to the gold standard, surgical limited fasciectomy, are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This monocentric retrospective study examined 35 patients who had been treated with bacterial collagenase for Dupuytren's contracture, conducting a long-term follow-up after an average of 5.7 years. The results were compared to a control group of 40 patients treated with surgical limited fasciectomy on average 5.5 years ago. Finger extension (Tubiana stage), strength, sensitivity, the effect of possible risk factors, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The long-term results after therapy for DD showed a significant reduction in the Tubiana stage for both groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, we observed a longer mean preintervention Tubiana stage and a better long-term improvement in the Tubiana stage for patients with limited fasciectomy when compared to the collagenase group. (both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Neither grip strength nor the pinch test showed significant differences when compared within each group or when comparing both groups. Both the treated and untreated fingers of patients with limited fasciectomy had a superior two-point discrimination (<i>p</i> < 0.001). For the URAM questionnaire, we observed a significantly better result in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Retrospectively, significantly more patients in the collagenase group would not choose the same therapy to treat DD (35 vs. 8%; <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two therapy options should be seen as complementary for the treatment of DD. Collagenase therapy seems a sensible option for DD with an earlier Tubiana stage and contractures that predominantly affect the MCP joint. Contractures with higher Tubiana stages that also affect the PIP joint should predominantly be treated with limited fasciectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":56144,"journal":{"name":"Life-Basel","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11767046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life15010076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dupuytren's disease (DD) is a systemic connective tissue disorder of the palm, predominantly affecting men of Northern European or Caucasian origin over 55. In addition to conventional surgery, Dupuytren's contracture can be treated in a minimally invasive way by injecting bacterial collagenase into the cord. However, studies on the long-term success rate when compared to the gold standard, surgical limited fasciectomy, are limited.

Methods: This monocentric retrospective study examined 35 patients who had been treated with bacterial collagenase for Dupuytren's contracture, conducting a long-term follow-up after an average of 5.7 years. The results were compared to a control group of 40 patients treated with surgical limited fasciectomy on average 5.5 years ago. Finger extension (Tubiana stage), strength, sensitivity, the effect of possible risk factors, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared between the two groups.

Results: The long-term results after therapy for DD showed a significant reduction in the Tubiana stage for both groups (p < 0.001). Additionally, we observed a longer mean preintervention Tubiana stage and a better long-term improvement in the Tubiana stage for patients with limited fasciectomy when compared to the collagenase group. (both p < 0.001). Neither grip strength nor the pinch test showed significant differences when compared within each group or when comparing both groups. Both the treated and untreated fingers of patients with limited fasciectomy had a superior two-point discrimination (p < 0.001). For the URAM questionnaire, we observed a significantly better result in the control group (p < 0.01). Retrospectively, significantly more patients in the collagenase group would not choose the same therapy to treat DD (35 vs. 8%; p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The two therapy options should be seen as complementary for the treatment of DD. Collagenase therapy seems a sensible option for DD with an earlier Tubiana stage and contractures that predominantly affect the MCP joint. Contractures with higher Tubiana stages that also affect the PIP joint should predominantly be treated with limited fasciectomy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dupuytren病的治疗(II):胶原酶治疗与有限筋膜切除术-一项长期比较研究
背景:Dupuytren病(DD)是一种手掌的系统性结缔组织疾病,主要影响55岁以上的北欧或高加索男性。除了常规手术外,还可以通过向脊髓注射细菌胶原酶的微创方法治疗Dupuytren挛缩。然而,与金标准手术局限性筋膜切除术相比,长期成功率的研究是有限的。方法:本单中心回顾性研究对35例接受细菌性胶原酶治疗的Dupuytren挛缩患者进行了平均5.7年的长期随访。结果与平均5.5年前接受有限筋膜切除术的40例患者的对照组进行了比较。比较两组间手指伸度(Tubiana期)、强度、敏感性、可能危险因素的影响以及患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。结果:DD治疗后的长期结果显示,两组的Tubiana期明显减少(p < 0.001)。此外,我们观察到,与胶原酶组相比,有限筋膜切除术患者的干预前平均Tubiana期更长,Tubiana期有更好的长期改善。(均p < 0.001)。无论是在组内比较还是两组比较,握力和捏紧测试都没有显示出显著差异。有限筋膜切除术患者治疗和未治疗的手指两点辨别能力均较好(p < 0.001)。对于URAM问卷,我们观察到对照组的结果明显更好(p < 0.01)。回顾性分析,胶原酶组中更多的患者不会选择相同的治疗方法来治疗DD (35% vs 8%;P < 0.05)。结论:这两种治疗方案应被视为DD治疗的补充。胶原酶治疗似乎是一个明智的选择,对于早期Tubiana期和挛缩主要影响MCP关节的DD。高结节期挛缩也会影响PIP关节,应主要采用有限筋膜切除术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Life-Basel
Life-Basel Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1798
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Life (ISSN 2075-1729) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of scientific studies related to fundamental themes in Life Sciences, especially those concerned with the origins of life and evolution of biosystems. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers.
期刊最新文献
"Protective" Imazalil vs Its Negative Effects on Immune System Cells-Neutrophils. Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Is Independently Associated with Differential Short-Term Cutaneous Reactivity Following Standardized Topical Provocation in Humans. The Evolving Landscape of Anti-Clonal Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Systemic Light-Chain (AL) Amyloidosis: Evidence- and Time-Based Comparison with Multiple Myeloma. Diabetes Mellitus as a Risk Factor for Severe Disease and Mortality Among Patients with Melioidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Comparison of Scrotal Orchiopexy Versus Traditional Inguinal Orchiopexy for Palpable Undescended and Retractile Testis in Children: Insights from a Greek Surgical Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1