Pulmonary function tests: an integrated approach to interpreting results in the search for treatable traits.

IF 2.7 Expert review of respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1080/17476348.2025.2458607
Agnaldo José Lopes
{"title":"Pulmonary function tests: an integrated approach to interpreting results in the search for treatable traits.","authors":"Agnaldo José Lopes","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2025.2458607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Technological advances have led to the proliferation of lung function assessment techniques beyond spirometry in most countries. At the same time, new knowledge of respiratory physiology has allowed an expansion of lung function parameters, requiring an integrated approach to interpreting results.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review addresses the major pulmonary function tests (PFTs) used in clinical practice, new concepts regarding reference values, and reformulations of terminology for defining standards of lung function impairment. It highlights the complexities and nuances inherent in the interpretation of PFT parameters, particularly in light of recent updates from the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>In a new paradigm, PFTs should be used to classify the pathophysiology of treatable traits rather than to diagnose respiratory disease, given the considerable variation in the clinical patterns of PFTs. It is necessary to look not only at lung mechanics but also at lung volume, gas transfer, and small airway involvement to capture as much information as possible. In this context, it is also important to understand that racial/ethnic differences in lung function are not due to biological differences but may reflect socioeconomic status and represent health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"121-143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2025.2458607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Technological advances have led to the proliferation of lung function assessment techniques beyond spirometry in most countries. At the same time, new knowledge of respiratory physiology has allowed an expansion of lung function parameters, requiring an integrated approach to interpreting results.

Areas covered: This review addresses the major pulmonary function tests (PFTs) used in clinical practice, new concepts regarding reference values, and reformulations of terminology for defining standards of lung function impairment. It highlights the complexities and nuances inherent in the interpretation of PFT parameters, particularly in light of recent updates from the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society.

Expert opinion: In a new paradigm, PFTs should be used to classify the pathophysiology of treatable traits rather than to diagnose respiratory disease, given the considerable variation in the clinical patterns of PFTs. It is necessary to look not only at lung mechanics but also at lung volume, gas transfer, and small airway involvement to capture as much information as possible. In this context, it is also important to understand that racial/ethnic differences in lung function are not due to biological differences but may reflect socioeconomic status and represent health disparities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺功能测试:一种综合的方法来解释结果在寻找可治疗的特征。
在大多数国家,技术进步导致肺功能评估技术在肺活量测定法之外的扩散。同时,呼吸生理学的新知识已经允许肺功能参数的扩展,需要一个综合的方法来解释结果。涵盖领域:本文综述了临床实践中使用的主要肺功能测试(PFTs),有关参考值的新概念,以及定义肺功能损害标准的术语的重新表述。它强调了PFT参数解释固有的复杂性和细微差别,特别是考虑到欧洲呼吸学会/美国胸科学会最近的更新。专家意见:在一个新的范例中,PFTs应该用于对可治疗特征的病理生理进行分类,而不是用于诊断呼吸系统疾病,因为PFTs的临床模式存在相当大的差异。不仅要观察肺力学,还要观察肺体积、气体传递和小气道受累情况,以获取尽可能多的信息。在这种情况下,同样重要的是要了解,肺功能的种族/民族差异不是由于生物学差异,而是可能反映社会经济地位和代表健康差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The double threat: bacterial and fungal co-/superinfection in viral pneumonia. An overview of the importance of allied healthcare for patients with COPD. Impact of anxiety, depression, fatigue, and social isolation in patients with bronchiectasis. Airway clearance techniques - a proposed classification based on definitions? An overview of central sleep apnea with heart failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1