A randomized control trial to compare Quiet Eye training efficacy to traditional technical training with undergraduate student nurses' peripheral intravenous cannulation performance: a protocol.

Shannon I A Parker, Jessica Wilkins, Shahzad Inayat, Noah Hollingsworth, Joe Causer, Shane Virani, Jeff K Caird
{"title":"A randomized control trial to compare Quiet Eye training efficacy to traditional technical training with undergraduate student nurses' peripheral intravenous cannulation performance: a protocol.","authors":"Shannon I A Parker, Jessica Wilkins, Shahzad Inayat, Noah Hollingsworth, Joe Causer, Shane Virani, Jeff K Caird","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2025.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) is a common and complex procedure with low first-attempt success rates, causing patient suffering and increased healthcare costs. Quiet Eye (QE) training, a gaze-focused approach, has shown promise in improving procedural PIVC skills. We will examine the effectiveness of traditional technical training (TT) and QE training (QET) on student nurse PIVC performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-four participants will be randomly assigned to either the TT or QET groups using a blocked randomization method to ensure balanced group sizes. Blinded outcome assessments will minimize bias. Data will be collected using a structured questionnaire and a mobile eye tracker to simultaneously record gaze and hand movements. Participants will complete pre-intervention, post-intervention, and one-week retention tests using a light-skinned manikin arm. A transfer task, utilizing a dark-skinned manikin arm, will assess participants' skills post-trials. The TT group will receive traditional instruction on hand movement improvement; the QET group will receive feedback on their gaze behaviours. The primary outcome measure will be PIVC first attempt success defined as being able to flush the inserted catheter with 10 mL (maximum) normal saline into the vessel. A trial will be considered unsuccessful if more than gentle pressure on the syringe plunger is needed to flush the catheter or if the participant abandoned the attempt before attempting the flush. Other dependent variables will be QE duration (%), number of fixations, total movement time(s), and movement phase time(s). We will analyze data with descriptive and inferential statistics, including mixed model ANOVA and Chi-Square tests.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study examines the significance of improving PIVC first attempt success rates and highlights QET potential as an intervention. Emphasis is placed on critical implications for health care, particularly the importance of integrating QET into nursing education programs. Future research utilizing large-scale trials and longitudinal designs is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"34 2","pages":"S21-S26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2025.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) is a common and complex procedure with low first-attempt success rates, causing patient suffering and increased healthcare costs. Quiet Eye (QE) training, a gaze-focused approach, has shown promise in improving procedural PIVC skills. We will examine the effectiveness of traditional technical training (TT) and QE training (QET) on student nurse PIVC performance.

Methods: Forty-four participants will be randomly assigned to either the TT or QET groups using a blocked randomization method to ensure balanced group sizes. Blinded outcome assessments will minimize bias. Data will be collected using a structured questionnaire and a mobile eye tracker to simultaneously record gaze and hand movements. Participants will complete pre-intervention, post-intervention, and one-week retention tests using a light-skinned manikin arm. A transfer task, utilizing a dark-skinned manikin arm, will assess participants' skills post-trials. The TT group will receive traditional instruction on hand movement improvement; the QET group will receive feedback on their gaze behaviours. The primary outcome measure will be PIVC first attempt success defined as being able to flush the inserted catheter with 10 mL (maximum) normal saline into the vessel. A trial will be considered unsuccessful if more than gentle pressure on the syringe plunger is needed to flush the catheter or if the participant abandoned the attempt before attempting the flush. Other dependent variables will be QE duration (%), number of fixations, total movement time(s), and movement phase time(s). We will analyze data with descriptive and inferential statistics, including mixed model ANOVA and Chi-Square tests.

Discussion: This study examines the significance of improving PIVC first attempt success rates and highlights QET potential as an intervention. Emphasis is placed on critical implications for health care, particularly the importance of integrating QET into nursing education programs. Future research utilizing large-scale trials and longitudinal designs is recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项比较静眼训练与传统技术训练效果与本科生护士外周静脉插管表现的随机对照试验:一项方案。
外周静脉插管(PIVC)是一种常见而复杂的手术,首次尝试成功率低,给患者带来痛苦,增加了医疗成本。静眼(QE)训练,一种专注于注视的方法,在提高程序性PIVC技能方面显示出了希望。我们将检验传统技术培训(TT)和QE培训(QET)对实习护士PIVC绩效的有效性。方法:44名参与者将被随机分配到TT组或QET组,采用阻塞随机化方法以确保组大小平衡。盲法结果评估将使偏倚最小化。数据将通过结构化问卷和移动眼动仪收集,同时记录凝视和手部运动。参与者将使用浅色皮肤的假臂完成干预前、干预后和一周的滞留测试。一项转移任务,利用深色皮肤的假臂,将评估参与者在试验后的技能。TT组将接受传统的手部运动改善指导;QET组将收到关于他们凝视行为的反馈。主要结局指标将是PIVC首次尝试的成功,定义为能够用10ml(最大)生理盐水冲洗插入导管进入血管。如果需要对注射器柱塞施加超过轻微的压力来冲洗导管,或者参与者在尝试冲洗之前放弃尝试,则认为试验不成功。其他因变量包括QE持续时间(%)、注视次数、总移动时间(s)和移动相位时间(s)。我们将用描述性和推断性统计分析数据,包括混合模型方差分析和卡方检验。讨论:本研究探讨了提高PIVC首次尝试成功率的意义,并强调了QET作为一种干预手段的潜力。重点放在对卫生保健的关键影响,特别是将QET纳入护理教育计划的重要性。建议未来的研究采用大规模试验和纵向设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing good reading habits for lifelong learning. A nursing vision for Wales. Erratum. Accuracy and performance of the Yuwell Anytime CT3 continuous glucose monitoring device. Technology in nursing: balancing innovation with compassion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1