Matthew Gabel, Semere Bekena, Mitch O'Meara, Andrea Denny, Erin D. Solomon, Krista L. Moulder, John C. Morris, Jessica Mozersky
{"title":"Current practices by Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers to remunerate research participants","authors":"Matthew Gabel, Semere Bekena, Mitch O'Meara, Andrea Denny, Erin D. Solomon, Krista L. Moulder, John C. Morris, Jessica Mozersky","doi":"10.1002/alz.14542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Recent guidance from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) recommends remuneration for all Alzheimer's disease (AD) research participants. Given AD research recruitment challenges, we assessed the remuneration practices at Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRCs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>We surveyed 37 ADRCs about remuneration for longitudinal research participants. This included type of remuneration (i.e., compensation, reimbursement) and which study procedures are remunerated. We had a 100% response rate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Most ADRCs (32/37) provide some remuneration but amounts and types varied. Most ADRCs reimburse for travel or food (<i>n </i>= 29), compensate for some study procedures (<i>n </i>= 32), but most do not remunerate study partners (<i>n </i>= 12) or offer financial incentives (<i>n </i>= 8). Few (<i>n </i>= 6) ADRCs pay for all procedures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Two areas for potential change are compensating for annual clinical and cognitive assessments that are compulsory, and for study partners. Evaluation of the impact of remuneration on recruitment and retention is needed, including for underrepresented groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Recent guidance recommends remuneration for Alzheimer's disease research participants.</li>\n \n <li>We surveyed all Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers about their remuneration practices.</li>\n \n <li>Most centers provide some form of remuneration to participants but this is variable.</li>\n \n <li>Potential areas for change are remuneration for study partners and annual study visits.</li>\n \n <li>Evaluating the impact of remuneration on recruitment and retention is needed.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.14542","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.14542","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Recent guidance from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) recommends remuneration for all Alzheimer's disease (AD) research participants. Given AD research recruitment challenges, we assessed the remuneration practices at Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRCs).
METHODS
We surveyed 37 ADRCs about remuneration for longitudinal research participants. This included type of remuneration (i.e., compensation, reimbursement) and which study procedures are remunerated. We had a 100% response rate.
RESULTS
Most ADRCs (32/37) provide some remuneration but amounts and types varied. Most ADRCs reimburse for travel or food (n = 29), compensate for some study procedures (n = 32), but most do not remunerate study partners (n = 12) or offer financial incentives (n = 8). Few (n = 6) ADRCs pay for all procedures.
DISCUSSION
Two areas for potential change are compensating for annual clinical and cognitive assessments that are compulsory, and for study partners. Evaluation of the impact of remuneration on recruitment and retention is needed, including for underrepresented groups.
Highlights
Recent guidance recommends remuneration for Alzheimer's disease research participants.
We surveyed all Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers about their remuneration practices.
Most centers provide some form of remuneration to participants but this is variable.
Potential areas for change are remuneration for study partners and annual study visits.
Evaluating the impact of remuneration on recruitment and retention is needed.
期刊介绍：
Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
