Challenges in multimorbidity and cognitive function studies: A call for rigorous analysis and reporting

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1002/alz.14391
Xiaozhi Chen, Zhiqiang Zhang
{"title":"Challenges in multimorbidity and cognitive function studies: A call for rigorous analysis and reporting","authors":"Xiaozhi Chen, Zhiqiang Zhang","doi":"10.1002/alz.14391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This letter is in response to “Multimorbidity measures associated with cognitive function among community-dwelling older Chinese adults” by Wang and colleagues.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p>\n<p>In their article, Wang et al. explored, using longitudinal survey data, the association of multimorbidity with cognitive function among older Chinese adults. We write to highlight key points for further exploration. First, exploratory factor analysis was used to examine the relationship among the 14 individual chronic conditions, but the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value of 0.67 can only indicate a mediocre pattern of correlations.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Addtionally, more than half of the factor loading were below 0.5, which is considerded as a threshold value with practical significance.</p>\n<p>As the authors note, most of these conditions were self-reported by participants except for components of sensory pattern; this may weaken the correlation between other patterns and cognitive function and likely explain the strongest association with cognitive function among sensory pattern both at baseline and the first follow-up; only sensory pattern showed similar results in both sexes compared with the total population may also be attributed to this. Similarly, participants with more chronic conditions were more likely to live in urban areas, possible explanation is that urban areas have relatively abundant medical resources compared to rural areas. These information biases caused by different disease detection rates may lead to a deviation from reality.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p>\n<p>Lack of death information is another issue. Although the study is still ongoing, the mortality data in a longitudinal study can be gradually updated during the follow-up period and analyzed based on existing data. Completely ignoring the impact of mortality may lead to bias in the risk assessment of cognitive decline, especially in the elderly population where mortality is a very common and significant competitive risk. Besides, the proportion of participants with the three multimorbidity patterns was not provided in the article, which directly affects the explanatory power of statistical analysis.<span><sup>4</sup></span></p>\n<p>Overall, this study provided interesting information on the multimorbidity measures and their association with cognitive performance in Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Nonetheless, imperfect exploratory factor analysis, information bias, and incomplete reporting impact its reliability and validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14391","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This letter is in response to “Multimorbidity measures associated with cognitive function among community-dwelling older Chinese adults” by Wang and colleagues.1

In their article, Wang et al. explored, using longitudinal survey data, the association of multimorbidity with cognitive function among older Chinese adults. We write to highlight key points for further exploration. First, exploratory factor analysis was used to examine the relationship among the 14 individual chronic conditions, but the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value of 0.67 can only indicate a mediocre pattern of correlations.2 Addtionally, more than half of the factor loading were below 0.5, which is considerded as a threshold value with practical significance.

As the authors note, most of these conditions were self-reported by participants except for components of sensory pattern; this may weaken the correlation between other patterns and cognitive function and likely explain the strongest association with cognitive function among sensory pattern both at baseline and the first follow-up; only sensory pattern showed similar results in both sexes compared with the total population may also be attributed to this. Similarly, participants with more chronic conditions were more likely to live in urban areas, possible explanation is that urban areas have relatively abundant medical resources compared to rural areas. These information biases caused by different disease detection rates may lead to a deviation from reality.3

Lack of death information is another issue. Although the study is still ongoing, the mortality data in a longitudinal study can be gradually updated during the follow-up period and analyzed based on existing data. Completely ignoring the impact of mortality may lead to bias in the risk assessment of cognitive decline, especially in the elderly population where mortality is a very common and significant competitive risk. Besides, the proportion of participants with the three multimorbidity patterns was not provided in the article, which directly affects the explanatory power of statistical analysis.4

Overall, this study provided interesting information on the multimorbidity measures and their association with cognitive performance in Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Nonetheless, imperfect exploratory factor analysis, information bias, and incomplete reporting impact its reliability and validity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
Response to the letter titled reply to “Associations of semaglutide with first-time diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: Target trial emulation using nationwide real-world data in the US” Reply to “Associations of semaglutide with first-time diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: Target trial emulation using nationwide real-world data in the US” Prevalence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in older adult population in Shanghai, China: A population-based observational study Influence of alpha-synuclein on glucose metabolism in Alzheimer's disease continuum: Analyses of α-synuclein seed amplification assay and FDG-PET A brain DNA co-methylation network analysis of psychosis in Alzheimer's disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1