Alendronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD001155.pub3
George A Wells, Shu-Ching Hsieh, Joan Peterson, Carine Zheng, Shannon E Kelly, Beverley Shea, Peter Tugwell
{"title":"Alendronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.","authors":"George A Wells, Shu-Ching Hsieh, Joan Peterson, Carine Zheng, Shannon E Kelly, Beverley Shea, Peter Tugwell","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD001155.pub3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Osteoporosis is an abnormal reduction in bone mass and bone deterioration, leading to increased fracture risk. Alendronate belongs to the bisphosphonate class of drugs, which inhibit bone resorption by interfering with the activity of osteoclasts (bone cells that break down bone tissue). This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2008.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the benefits and harms of alendronate in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women at lower and higher risk of fracture, respectively.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (which includes CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, two trial registers, drug approval agency websites, and the bibliographies of relevant systematic reviews to identify the studies included in this review. The latest search date was 01 February 2023. We imposed no restrictions on language, date, form of publication, or reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We included only randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of alendronate on postmenopausal women. Targeted participants must have received at least one year of alendronate. We classified a study as secondary prevention if its population met one or more of the following hierarchical criteria: a diagnosis of osteoporosis, a history of vertebral fractures, a low bone mineral density T-score (-2.5 or lower), and 75 years old or older. If a study population met none of those criteria, we classified it as a primary prevention study.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Our major outcomes were clinical vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, and wrist fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Risk of bias: </strong>We used the Cochrane risk of bias 1 tool.</p><p><strong>Synthesis methods: </strong>We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Based on the previous review experience, in which the clinical and methodological characteristics in the primary and secondary prevention studies were homogeneous, we used a fixed-effect model for meta-analysis and estimated effects using the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. Our base case analyses included all eligible placebo-controlled studies with usable data. We selected the data available for the longest treatment period. We consider a relative change exceeding 15% as clinically important.</p><p><strong>Included studies: </strong>We included 119 studies, of which 102 studies provided data for quantitative synthesis. Of these, we classified 34 studies (15,188 participants) as primary prevention and 68 studies (29,577 participants) as secondary prevention. We had concerns about risks of bias in most studies. Selection bias was the most frequently overlooked domain, with only 20 studies (19%) describing appropriate methods for both sequence generation and allocation concealment. Eight studies (8%) were at low risk of bias in all seven domains.</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>The base case analyses included 16 primary prevention studies (one to five years in length; 10,057 women) and 20 secondary prevention studies (one to three years in length; 7375 women) which compared alendronate 10 mg/day (or 70 mg/week) to placebo, no treatment, or both. Indirectness, imprecision, and risk of bias emerged as the main factors contributing to the downgrading of the certainty of the evidence. For primary prevention, alendronate may lead to a clinically important reduction in clinical vertebral fractures (16/1190 in the alendronate group versus 24/926 in the placebo group; RR 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25 to 0.84; absolute risk reduction [ARR] 1.4% fewer, 95% CI 1.9% fewer to 0.4% fewer; low-certainty evidence) and non-vertebral fractures (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97; ARR 1.6% fewer, 95% CI 2.6% fewer to 0.3% fewer; low-certainty evidence). However, clinically important differences were not observed for the following outcomes: hip fractures (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.32; ARR 0.2% fewer, 95% CI 0.4% fewer to 0.2% more; low-certainty evidence); wrist fractures (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.49; ARR 0.3% more, 95% CI 0.4% fewer to 1.1% more; low-certainty evidence); withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.18; ARR 0.2% more, 95% CI 0.9% fewer to 1.5% more; low-certainty evidence); and serious adverse events (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.43; ARR 0.5% more, 95% CI 1.2% fewer to 2.8% more; low-certainty evidence). For secondary prevention, alendronate probably results in a clinically important reduction in clinical vertebral fractures (24/1114 in the alendronate group versus 51/1055 in the placebo group; RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.73; ARR 2.7% fewer, 95% CI 3.5% fewer to 1.3% fewer; moderate-certainty evidence). It may lead to a clinically important reduction in non-vertebral fractures (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99; ARR 2.8% fewer, 95% CI 5.1% fewer to 0.1% fewer; low-certainty evidence); hip fractures (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.96; ARR 1.0% fewer, 95% CI 1.5% fewer to 0.1% fewer; low-certainty evidence); wrist fractures (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.90; ARR 1.8% fewer, 95% CI 2.6% fewer to 0.4% fewer; low-certainty evidence); and serious adverse events (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96; ARR 3.5% fewer, 95% CI 5.8% fewer to 0.6% fewer; low-certainty evidence). However, the effects of alendronate for withdrawals due to adverse events are uncertain (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.16; ARR 0.4% fewer, 95% CI 1.7% fewer to 1.3% more; very low-certainty evidence). Furthermore, the updated evidence for the safety risks of alendronate suggests that, irrespective of participants' risk of fracture, alendronate may lead to little or no difference for gastrointestinal adverse events. Zero incidents of osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fracture were observed.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>For primary prevention, compared to placebo, alendronate 10 mg/day may reduce clinical vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, but it might make little or no difference to hip and wrist fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. For secondary prevention, alendronate probably reduces clinical vertebral fractures, and may reduce non-vertebral, hip, and wrist fractures, and serious adverse events, compared to placebo. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of alendronate on withdrawals due to adverse events.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This review is an update of the previous review (DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001155).</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"1 ","pages":"CD001155"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001155.pub3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Osteoporosis is an abnormal reduction in bone mass and bone deterioration, leading to increased fracture risk. Alendronate belongs to the bisphosphonate class of drugs, which inhibit bone resorption by interfering with the activity of osteoclasts (bone cells that break down bone tissue). This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2008.

Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of alendronate in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women at lower and higher risk of fracture, respectively.

Search methods: We searched Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (which includes CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, two trial registers, drug approval agency websites, and the bibliographies of relevant systematic reviews to identify the studies included in this review. The latest search date was 01 February 2023. We imposed no restrictions on language, date, form of publication, or reported outcomes.

Eligibility criteria: We included only randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of alendronate on postmenopausal women. Targeted participants must have received at least one year of alendronate. We classified a study as secondary prevention if its population met one or more of the following hierarchical criteria: a diagnosis of osteoporosis, a history of vertebral fractures, a low bone mineral density T-score (-2.5 or lower), and 75 years old or older. If a study population met none of those criteria, we classified it as a primary prevention study.

Outcomes: Our major outcomes were clinical vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, and wrist fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events.

Risk of bias: We used the Cochrane risk of bias 1 tool.

Synthesis methods: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Based on the previous review experience, in which the clinical and methodological characteristics in the primary and secondary prevention studies were homogeneous, we used a fixed-effect model for meta-analysis and estimated effects using the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. Our base case analyses included all eligible placebo-controlled studies with usable data. We selected the data available for the longest treatment period. We consider a relative change exceeding 15% as clinically important.

Included studies: We included 119 studies, of which 102 studies provided data for quantitative synthesis. Of these, we classified 34 studies (15,188 participants) as primary prevention and 68 studies (29,577 participants) as secondary prevention. We had concerns about risks of bias in most studies. Selection bias was the most frequently overlooked domain, with only 20 studies (19%) describing appropriate methods for both sequence generation and allocation concealment. Eight studies (8%) were at low risk of bias in all seven domains.

Synthesis of results: The base case analyses included 16 primary prevention studies (one to five years in length; 10,057 women) and 20 secondary prevention studies (one to three years in length; 7375 women) which compared alendronate 10 mg/day (or 70 mg/week) to placebo, no treatment, or both. Indirectness, imprecision, and risk of bias emerged as the main factors contributing to the downgrading of the certainty of the evidence. For primary prevention, alendronate may lead to a clinically important reduction in clinical vertebral fractures (16/1190 in the alendronate group versus 24/926 in the placebo group; RR 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25 to 0.84; absolute risk reduction [ARR] 1.4% fewer, 95% CI 1.9% fewer to 0.4% fewer; low-certainty evidence) and non-vertebral fractures (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97; ARR 1.6% fewer, 95% CI 2.6% fewer to 0.3% fewer; low-certainty evidence). However, clinically important differences were not observed for the following outcomes: hip fractures (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.32; ARR 0.2% fewer, 95% CI 0.4% fewer to 0.2% more; low-certainty evidence); wrist fractures (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.49; ARR 0.3% more, 95% CI 0.4% fewer to 1.1% more; low-certainty evidence); withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.18; ARR 0.2% more, 95% CI 0.9% fewer to 1.5% more; low-certainty evidence); and serious adverse events (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.43; ARR 0.5% more, 95% CI 1.2% fewer to 2.8% more; low-certainty evidence). For secondary prevention, alendronate probably results in a clinically important reduction in clinical vertebral fractures (24/1114 in the alendronate group versus 51/1055 in the placebo group; RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.73; ARR 2.7% fewer, 95% CI 3.5% fewer to 1.3% fewer; moderate-certainty evidence). It may lead to a clinically important reduction in non-vertebral fractures (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99; ARR 2.8% fewer, 95% CI 5.1% fewer to 0.1% fewer; low-certainty evidence); hip fractures (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.96; ARR 1.0% fewer, 95% CI 1.5% fewer to 0.1% fewer; low-certainty evidence); wrist fractures (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.90; ARR 1.8% fewer, 95% CI 2.6% fewer to 0.4% fewer; low-certainty evidence); and serious adverse events (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96; ARR 3.5% fewer, 95% CI 5.8% fewer to 0.6% fewer; low-certainty evidence). However, the effects of alendronate for withdrawals due to adverse events are uncertain (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.16; ARR 0.4% fewer, 95% CI 1.7% fewer to 1.3% more; very low-certainty evidence). Furthermore, the updated evidence for the safety risks of alendronate suggests that, irrespective of participants' risk of fracture, alendronate may lead to little or no difference for gastrointestinal adverse events. Zero incidents of osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fracture were observed.

Authors' conclusions: For primary prevention, compared to placebo, alendronate 10 mg/day may reduce clinical vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, but it might make little or no difference to hip and wrist fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. For secondary prevention, alendronate probably reduces clinical vertebral fractures, and may reduce non-vertebral, hip, and wrist fractures, and serious adverse events, compared to placebo. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of alendronate on withdrawals due to adverse events.

Funding: This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.

Registration: This review is an update of the previous review (DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001155).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿仑膦酸钠对绝经后妇女骨质疏松性骨折的一级和二级预防作用。
理由:骨质疏松症是骨量异常减少和骨质恶化,导致骨折风险增加。阿仑膦酸钠属于双膦酸类药物,通过干扰破骨细胞(分解骨组织的骨细胞)的活性来抑制骨吸收。这是对2008年首次发表的Cochrane综述的更新。目的:评价阿仑膦酸钠在绝经后低骨折风险和高骨折风险妇女骨质疏松性骨折一级和二级预防中的利与弊。检索方法:我们检索了循证医学综述(包括CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、Embase、两个试验注册库、药物审批机构网站和相关系统综述的参考文献,以确定本综述纳入的研究。最近一次搜索日期是2023年2月1日。我们没有对语言、日期、出版形式或报告结果施加限制。入选标准:我们只纳入了评估阿仑膦酸钠对绝经后妇女影响的随机对照试验。目标参与者必须接受过至少一年的阿仑膦酸钠治疗。如果研究对象符合以下一项或多项分级标准,我们将其归类为二级预防研究:骨质疏松症诊断、椎体骨折史、低骨密度t评分(-2.5或更低)、年龄在75岁或以上。如果研究人群不符合这些标准,我们将其归类为一级预防研究。结局:我们的主要结局是临床椎体、非椎体、髋部和腕部骨折、因不良事件和严重不良事件而停药。偏倚风险:我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险1工具。综合方法:我们采用Cochrane期望的标准方法学程序。基于先前的综述经验,其中一级和二级预防研究的临床和方法学特征是均匀的,我们使用固定效应模型进行meta分析,并使用风险比(RR)对二分类结果估计效果。我们的基本案例分析包括所有有可用数据的符合条件的安慰剂对照研究。我们选择了最长治疗期的可用数据。我们认为相对变化超过15%具有重要的临床意义。纳入研究:纳入119项研究,其中102项研究为定量综合提供了资料。其中,我们将34项研究(15,188名受试者)分类为一级预防,68项研究(29,577名受试者)分类为二级预防。我们担心在大多数研究中存在偏倚风险。选择偏差是最常被忽视的领域,只有20项研究(19%)描述了序列生成和分配隐藏的适当方法。8项研究(8%)在所有7个领域均为低偏倚风险。结果综合:基本病例分析包括16项一级预防研究(1 - 5年;10,057名妇女)和20项二级预防研究(为期一至三年;7375名女性),将阿仑膦酸钠10毫克/天(或70毫克/周)与安慰剂、不治疗或两者兼而有之。间接、不精确和偏倚风险是导致证据确定性降低的主要因素。对于一级预防,阿仑膦酸钠可能导致临床椎体骨折的临床重要减少(阿仑膦酸钠组为16/1190,安慰剂组为24/926;RR 0.45, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.25 ~ 0.84;绝对风险降低[ARR]减少1.4%,95% CI减少1.9%至0.4%;低确定性证据)和非椎体骨折(RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 ~ 0.97;ARR降低1.6%,95% CI降低2.6%至0.3%;确定性的证据)。然而,在以下结果中未观察到临床上重要的差异:髋部骨折(RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.43 ~ 1.32;ARR减少0.2%,95% CI减少0.4%至增加0.2%;确定性的证据);腕部骨折(RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.84 ~ 1.49;ARR增加0.3%,95% CI减少0.4%至增加1.1%;确定性的证据);不良事件导致的停药(RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89 ~ 1.18;ARR增加0.2%,95% CI减少0.9%至增加1.5%;确定性的证据);严重不良事件(RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.82 ~ 1.43;ARR增加0.5%,95% CI减少1.2%至增加2.8%;确定性的证据)。对于二级预防,阿仑膦酸钠可能导致临床椎体骨折的临床重要减少(阿仑膦酸钠组为24/1114,安慰剂组为51/1055;RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 ~ 0.73;ARR降低2.7%,95% CI降低3.5%至1.3%;moderate-certainty证据)。它可能导致非椎体骨折的临床重要减少(RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64 ~ 0.99;ARR降低2.8%,95% CI降低5.1%至0.1%;确定性的证据);髋部骨折(RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 ~ 0.96;ARR降低1.0%,95% CI降低1.5%至0.1%;确定性的证据);腕关节骨折(RR 0.54, 95% CI 0。 33 ~ 0.90;ARR降低1.8%,95% CI降低2.6%至0.4%;确定性的证据);严重不良事件(RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 ~ 0.96;ARR降低3.5%,95% CI降低5.8%至0.6%;确定性的证据)。然而,阿仑膦酸钠对因不良事件而停药的影响尚不确定(RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78 ~ 1.16;ARR减少0.4%,95% CI减少1.7%至增加1.3%;非常低确定性证据)。此外,关于阿仑膦酸钠安全风险的最新证据表明,无论参与者的骨折风险如何,阿仑膦酸钠可能导致很少或没有胃肠道不良事件的差异。无颌骨坏死和非典型股骨骨折发生。作者的结论是:对于一级预防,与安慰剂相比,阿仑膦酸钠10mg /天可以减少临床椎体和非椎体骨折,但对于髋部和腕部骨折、不良事件引起的停药和严重不良事件可能几乎没有区别。对于二级预防,与安慰剂相比,阿仑膦酸钠可能减少临床椎体骨折,并可能减少非椎体、髋部和腕部骨折以及严重不良事件。证据非常不确定阿仑膦酸钠对不良事件引起的停药的影响。资金来源:Cochrane综述没有专门的资金来源。注册:本综述是上一综述的更新(DOI: 10.002 /14651858. cd001155)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
期刊最新文献
Robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis. Substitution of nurses for physicians in the hospital setting for patient, process of care, and economic outcomes. Training health professionals in smoking cessation. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer. Antifibrinolytics (lysine analogues) for the prevention of bleeding in people with haematological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1