Covered Versus Bare Metal Stents in Chronic Mesenteric Ischaemia Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Annals of vascular surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.071
Nathalia de Carvalho Dias Miranda, Felipe Santos Marimpietri, Luccas Marcollin Miranda, Pedro Emanuel Carneiro de Lima, Danilo Costa Marques da Silva Vasconcellos, Eduardo Corvello Teixeira, Tayrine Mazotti de Moraes
{"title":"Covered Versus Bare Metal Stents in Chronic Mesenteric Ischaemia Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Nathalia de Carvalho Dias Miranda, Felipe Santos Marimpietri, Luccas Marcollin Miranda, Pedro Emanuel Carneiro de Lima, Danilo Costa Marques da Silva Vasconcellos, Eduardo Corvello Teixeira, Tayrine Mazotti de Moraes","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The main treatment for Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia (CMI) is revascularization, typically achieved through stent angioplasty of the superior mesenteric artery, and in certain cases, the celiac trunk. However, long-term outcomes using bare-metal stents have been less than satisfactory. Therefore, we aimed to compare the performance of covered stents (CS) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients treated for CMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were systematically searched for studies of patients with CMI who underwent stenting procedures using BMS or CS. The main outcomes were primary patency and freedom from reintervention. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 3.6.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One randomized clinical trial and five observational studies were included. In the pooled analysis, patients undergoing the covered stenting approach haOd a higher primary patency (HR 0.40; 95%CI 0.23-0.68; p<0.01). Additionally, CS also demonstrated significantly superior freedom from reintervention when compared to BMS patients (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.13-0.71; p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing transluminal angioplasty with stent placement both in the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery, the use of CS indicated superior primary patency and a higher rate of freedom from reintervention compared to BMS. These findings indicate superior outcomes with CS and may suggest their use as the preferred stent option in patients with CMI. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited number of studies, the moderate to serious risk of bias in the included data, and the significant heterogeneity observed. Further high-quality clinical trials are necessary to validate these results and strengthen the evidence base for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The main treatment for Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia (CMI) is revascularization, typically achieved through stent angioplasty of the superior mesenteric artery, and in certain cases, the celiac trunk. However, long-term outcomes using bare-metal stents have been less than satisfactory. Therefore, we aimed to compare the performance of covered stents (CS) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients treated for CMI.

Methods: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were systematically searched for studies of patients with CMI who underwent stenting procedures using BMS or CS. The main outcomes were primary patency and freedom from reintervention. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 3.6.

Results: One randomized clinical trial and five observational studies were included. In the pooled analysis, patients undergoing the covered stenting approach haOd a higher primary patency (HR 0.40; 95%CI 0.23-0.68; p<0.01). Additionally, CS also demonstrated significantly superior freedom from reintervention when compared to BMS patients (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.13-0.71; p<0.01).

Conclusion: In patients undergoing transluminal angioplasty with stent placement both in the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery, the use of CS indicated superior primary patency and a higher rate of freedom from reintervention compared to BMS. These findings indicate superior outcomes with CS and may suggest their use as the preferred stent option in patients with CMI. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited number of studies, the moderate to serious risk of bias in the included data, and the significant heterogeneity observed. Further high-quality clinical trials are necessary to validate these results and strengthen the evidence base for clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
期刊最新文献
Association of Chronic Limb Ischemia Rutherford Classification with Clinical Outcomes Following Lower Extremity Revascularization. Benefits of Duplex Ultrasound Surveillance of infra-inguinal bypass grafts and institutional costs of graft failure: a retrospective single-centre study. Comparison of treatment outcomes between graft replacement and aneurysmorrhaphy with graft preservation for type 2 endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Covered Versus Bare Metal Stents in Chronic Mesenteric Ischaemia Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Incidence and comparison of postoperative explained and unexplained fever in open aortic repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1