Stalin Canizares, Adriana Montalvan, Devin Eckhoff, Kalathil K. Sureshkumar, Bhavna Chopra
{"title":"Long Term Outcomes of Transplant Recipients Comparing Belatacept vs. Tacrolimus: A UNOS Database Analysis","authors":"Stalin Canizares, Adriana Montalvan, Devin Eckhoff, Kalathil K. Sureshkumar, Bhavna Chopra","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Calcineurin inhibitors have been the choice for maintenance immunosuppression (IS) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), but they are associated with nephrotoxicity and metabolic side effects. We aim to compare the long-term outcomes of KTR on belatacept (bela) versus tacrolimus (tac) IS, in all KTRs and various subgroups. Using the UNOS-STAR files, we identified adult first-KTR from 2010 to 2022. Patients were categorized based on maintenance-IS at index transplant admission by creating a propensity score matched cohort at 1:5 rate using several clinical characteristics. Primary outcomes included patient death, graft failure (GF), and death-censored graft failure (DCGF). Secondary outcomes included delayed graft function (DGF), acute-rejections (AR) within a year, and serum creatinine (Cr) at 1-year. The propensity-matched cohort included KTRs on bela (<i>N</i> = 2612) and tac (<i>N</i> = 12760). There was no significant difference in the hazard ratio of death (1.03 [0.92, 1.14]), GF (1.07 [0.97, 1.17]), or DCGF (1.11 [0.98, 1.25]). A sensitivity analysis comparing a propensity-matched cohort of bela + tac (<i>n</i> = 2033) versus tac (<i>n</i> = 9004); demonstrated significantly reduced risks of death (0.87 [0.76–1.00], <i>p</i> = 0.043) and GF (0.73 [0.64–0.83] <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to those on Tac alone. In conclusion, bela + tac seems to be a nephron-sparing and rejection-lowering IS regimen with overall improved graft and patient outcomes when compared to the current standard of tacrolimus. Larger Randomized Controlled studies are needed.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Calcineurin inhibitors have been the choice for maintenance immunosuppression (IS) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), but they are associated with nephrotoxicity and metabolic side effects. We aim to compare the long-term outcomes of KTR on belatacept (bela) versus tacrolimus (tac) IS, in all KTRs and various subgroups. Using the UNOS-STAR files, we identified adult first-KTR from 2010 to 2022. Patients were categorized based on maintenance-IS at index transplant admission by creating a propensity score matched cohort at 1:5 rate using several clinical characteristics. Primary outcomes included patient death, graft failure (GF), and death-censored graft failure (DCGF). Secondary outcomes included delayed graft function (DGF), acute-rejections (AR) within a year, and serum creatinine (Cr) at 1-year. The propensity-matched cohort included KTRs on bela (N = 2612) and tac (N = 12760). There was no significant difference in the hazard ratio of death (1.03 [0.92, 1.14]), GF (1.07 [0.97, 1.17]), or DCGF (1.11 [0.98, 1.25]). A sensitivity analysis comparing a propensity-matched cohort of bela + tac (n = 2033) versus tac (n = 9004); demonstrated significantly reduced risks of death (0.87 [0.76–1.00], p = 0.043) and GF (0.73 [0.64–0.83] p < 0.001) compared to those on Tac alone. In conclusion, bela + tac seems to be a nephron-sparing and rejection-lowering IS regimen with overall improved graft and patient outcomes when compared to the current standard of tacrolimus. Larger Randomized Controlled studies are needed.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
