Knowledge and attitude of deaf women in relation to contraceptive methods: A systematic review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Clinics Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100558
Gabriela Fuster Barbosa, Edson Santos Ferreira-Filho, Lais Abdo Quintão, Laura Fernandes Berto, Patrícia Gonçalves de Almeida, Edmund Chada Baracat, Luis Bahamondes, José Maria Soares-Junior, Isabel Cristina Esposito Sorpreso
{"title":"Knowledge and attitude of deaf women in relation to contraceptive methods: A systematic review.","authors":"Gabriela Fuster Barbosa, Edson Santos Ferreira-Filho, Lais Abdo Quintão, Laura Fernandes Berto, Patrícia Gonçalves de Almeida, Edmund Chada Baracat, Luis Bahamondes, José Maria Soares-Junior, Isabel Cristina Esposito Sorpreso","doi":"10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communication barriers make it difficult for deaf women to access information about contraceptive methods, making them vulnerable to unplanned pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify knowledge and attitudes of deaf women in relation to contraceptive methods.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature, PROSPERO registry (CRD42021277635), conducted from August 2021 to April 2024. The included studies focused on knowledge and attitudes about contraception among women with deafness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve articles were included, with a total of 2,641 participants and those reported low knowledge about contraceptive methods. Nine studies showed withdrawal, condoms, and oral contraceptives as the best methods that deaf women know. Five studies showed low knowledge about intrauterine devices and subdermal implants. The main reasons given for abandoning the method were reproductive desire and fear of side effects. The use of hormonal contraceptives was higher among adult women and, two studies showed that among teenagers the practice of withdrawal was higher than the use of condoms. The barriers most mentioned in the eight articles for the use of contraceptives were those of communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Knowledge of contraceptives among deaf women was low; however, the attitude of acceptance of the use of contraceptive methods was favorable, despite the little access to more effective methods, especially among adolescents. The factor associated with low knowledge evidenced in the systematic review was communication barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10472,"journal":{"name":"Clinics","volume":"80 ","pages":"100558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100558","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Communication barriers make it difficult for deaf women to access information about contraceptive methods, making them vulnerable to unplanned pregnancies.

Objective: To identify knowledge and attitudes of deaf women in relation to contraceptive methods.

Method: The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature, PROSPERO registry (CRD42021277635), conducted from August 2021 to April 2024. The included studies focused on knowledge and attitudes about contraception among women with deafness.

Results: Twelve articles were included, with a total of 2,641 participants and those reported low knowledge about contraceptive methods. Nine studies showed withdrawal, condoms, and oral contraceptives as the best methods that deaf women know. Five studies showed low knowledge about intrauterine devices and subdermal implants. The main reasons given for abandoning the method were reproductive desire and fear of side effects. The use of hormonal contraceptives was higher among adult women and, two studies showed that among teenagers the practice of withdrawal was higher than the use of condoms. The barriers most mentioned in the eight articles for the use of contraceptives were those of communication.

Conclusion: Knowledge of contraceptives among deaf women was low; however, the attitude of acceptance of the use of contraceptive methods was favorable, despite the little access to more effective methods, especially among adolescents. The factor associated with low knowledge evidenced in the systematic review was communication barriers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinics
Clinics 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
129
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: CLINICS is an electronic journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles in continuous flow, of interest to clinicians and researchers in the medical sciences. CLINICS complies with the policies of funding agencies which request or require deposition of the published articles that they fund into publicly available databases. CLINICS supports the position of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) on trial registration.
期刊最新文献
Small fiber neuropathy with dysautonomia and positive GPCR and FGFR-3 antibodies after the first BNT162b2 dose. TRIB3 is a biomarker of poor prognosis in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and may affect tumor development through PI3K / AKT / mTOR pathway. Variations of renal Doppler indices during the initial 24-hour predict acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis: A single-center observational case-control clinical study. Difference among frailty assessment tools in predicating postoperative prognosis of elderly patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Evaluation of corneal incision in femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1