Effect of Lamotrigine on Refractory Epilepsy: Clinical Outcomes and EEG Changes.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S505040
Zheng Li, Peng Wu, Qiushuo Chen, Xinqiang Tong, Qichao Yang
{"title":"Effect of Lamotrigine on Refractory Epilepsy: Clinical Outcomes and EEG Changes.","authors":"Zheng Li, Peng Wu, Qiushuo Chen, Xinqiang Tong, Qichao Yang","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S505040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Refractory epilepsy poses significant challenges in clinical management due to its resistance to standard antiepileptic therapies, necessitating the exploration of more effective treatment regimens. Lamotrigine, with its proven efficacy and tolerability, offers potential benefits when combined with traditional medications like valproate, though its comprehensive impact on clinical outcomes and neurological markers requires further study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the improvement effect of combined application of lamotrigine on refractory epilepsy patients and its impact on patients' EEG and neurological function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed the clinical data of 93 patients with refractory epilepsy who were admitted to our hospital between January 2023 and June 2024. Based on the treatment interventions received, patients were divided into a control group (n=46, treated with valproate) and an observation group (n=47, treated with lamotrigine in addition to valproate). The clinical treatment effects, EEG (δ, θ, α, β) power levels, neurological function indicators [brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), pro-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, Bax], inflammatory response indicators [interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)], and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical treatment effect in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group, with a higher total effective rate (93.62% vs 76.09%, P<0.05). The monthly seizure frequency was significantly reduced in both groups after treatment (P < 0.05). The observation group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in seizure frequency compared to the control group (P = 0.014). Regarding EEG power levels, both groups showed decreases in δ and θ power levels and increases in α and β power levels after treatment, with the observation group exhibiting more pronounced changes (P<0.05). Neurological function indicators revealed that Bcl-2 levels decreased, while BDNF, NGF, and Bax levels increased in both groups after treatment, with the observation group showing more significant improvements (P<0.05). Similarly, inflammatory response indicators, including IL-1β, IL-6, and PGE2, decreased in both groups, with the observation group demonstrating greater reductions (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was comparable between the two groups, with no significant difference observed (23.40% vs 17.39%, P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to valproate treatment alone, the combined application of lamotrigine can further enhance the efficacy in refractory epilepsy patients, Lower the seizure frequency, improve EEG power levels and neurological function, reduce inflammatory responses, and does not increase the risk of related adverse reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"281-290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S505040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Refractory epilepsy poses significant challenges in clinical management due to its resistance to standard antiepileptic therapies, necessitating the exploration of more effective treatment regimens. Lamotrigine, with its proven efficacy and tolerability, offers potential benefits when combined with traditional medications like valproate, though its comprehensive impact on clinical outcomes and neurological markers requires further study.

Objective: To analyze the improvement effect of combined application of lamotrigine on refractory epilepsy patients and its impact on patients' EEG and neurological function.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the clinical data of 93 patients with refractory epilepsy who were admitted to our hospital between January 2023 and June 2024. Based on the treatment interventions received, patients were divided into a control group (n=46, treated with valproate) and an observation group (n=47, treated with lamotrigine in addition to valproate). The clinical treatment effects, EEG (δ, θ, α, β) power levels, neurological function indicators [brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), pro-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, Bax], inflammatory response indicators [interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)], and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

Results: The clinical treatment effect in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group, with a higher total effective rate (93.62% vs 76.09%, P<0.05). The monthly seizure frequency was significantly reduced in both groups after treatment (P < 0.05). The observation group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in seizure frequency compared to the control group (P = 0.014). Regarding EEG power levels, both groups showed decreases in δ and θ power levels and increases in α and β power levels after treatment, with the observation group exhibiting more pronounced changes (P<0.05). Neurological function indicators revealed that Bcl-2 levels decreased, while BDNF, NGF, and Bax levels increased in both groups after treatment, with the observation group showing more significant improvements (P<0.05). Similarly, inflammatory response indicators, including IL-1β, IL-6, and PGE2, decreased in both groups, with the observation group demonstrating greater reductions (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was comparable between the two groups, with no significant difference observed (23.40% vs 17.39%, P>0.05).

Conclusion: Compared to valproate treatment alone, the combined application of lamotrigine can further enhance the efficacy in refractory epilepsy patients, Lower the seizure frequency, improve EEG power levels and neurological function, reduce inflammatory responses, and does not increase the risk of related adverse reactions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉莫三嗪治疗难治性癫痫的临床疗效及脑电图变化。
背景:难治性癫痫对标准抗癫痫治疗具有耐药性,给临床管理带来了重大挑战,需要探索更有效的治疗方案。拉莫三嗪的疗效和耐受性已得到证实,当与丙戊酸盐等传统药物联合使用时,它可能会带来潜在的益处,尽管它对临床结果和神经学指标的综合影响还需要进一步研究。目的:分析拉莫三嗪联合应用对难治性癫痫患者的改善效果及对患者脑电图和神经功能的影响。方法:回顾性队列研究分析我院2023年1月至2024年6月收治的93例难治性癫痫患者的临床资料。根据所接受的治疗干预措施,将患者分为对照组(n=46,丙戊酸治疗)和观察组(n=47,在丙戊酸治疗的基础上加用拉莫三嗪治疗)。比较两组患者的临床治疗效果、脑电图(δ、θ、α、β)功率水平、神经功能指标[脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)、神经生长因子(NGF)、促凋亡蛋白Bcl-2、Bax]、炎症反应指标[白细胞介素-1β (IL-1β)、白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)、前列腺素E2 (PGE2)]及不良反应发生率。结果:观察组临床治疗效果明显优于对照组,总有效率高于对照组(93.62% vs 76.09%, P0.05)。结论:与丙戊酸单独治疗相比,联合应用拉莫三嗪可进一步提高难治性癫痫患者的疗效,降低发作频率,改善脑电图功率水平和神经功能,减轻炎症反应,且不增加相关不良反应的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
Identification and Validation of FOXK1-Related Biomarkers in Diabetic Retinopathy. IFN-γ and IL-6 as Key Predicting Biomarkers for Active TB Among PLWH: Results from Four Machine Learning Methods. Arabic Translation & Validation of Strength, Ambulation, Rising from A Chair, Stair Climbing and History of Falling Scale (SARC-F). Patient-Perceived Barriers to Early Help-Seeking, Diagnosis, and Surgical Treatment for Rural Patients with Venous Leg Ulcers: A Qualitative Study. Development and External Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1