Construction and Validation of a Major Depression Risk Predictive Model for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: Insights from NHANES 2005-2018.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.31083/RCM25998
Li-Xiang Zhang, Shan-Bing Hou, Fang-Fang Zhao, Ting-Ting Wang, Ying Jiang, Xiao-Juan Zhou, Jiao-Yu Cao
{"title":"Construction and Validation of a Major Depression Risk Predictive Model for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: Insights from NHANES 2005-2018.","authors":"Li-Xiang Zhang, Shan-Bing Hou, Fang-Fang Zhao, Ting-Ting Wang, Ying Jiang, Xiao-Juan Zhou, Jiao-Yu Cao","doi":"10.31083/RCM25998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for major depression risk in adult patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), offering evidence for targeted prevention and intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2005 to 2018, 1098 adults with CHD were included. A weighted logistic regression model was applied to construct and validate a nomogram-based prediction tool for major depression in this population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The weighted prevalence of major depression among these patients was 13.95%. Multivariate weighted logistic regression revealed that waist circumference, smoking status, arthritis, sleep disorders, and restricted work capacity were independent risk factors for major depression (odds ratio (OR) >1, <i>p</i> < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in the nomogram model for both the development and validation cohorts were 0.816 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.776-0.857) and 0.765 (95% CI: 0.699-0.832), respectively, indicating the model possessed strong discriminative ability. Brier scores in the development and validation cohorts were 0.107 and 0.127, respectively, both well below the 0.25 threshold, demonstrating good calibration. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that when the threshold probability for major depression ranged from 0.04 to 0.54 in the development group and from 0.08 to 0.52 in the validation group, the nomogram provided the highest clinical net benefit compared to \"Treat All\" and \"Treat None\" strategies, confirming its strong clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With a weighted prevalence of 13.95%, this nomogram model shows excellent predictive performance and clinical relevance for predicting major depression risk in patients with CHD. Thus, the model can be applied to aid healthcare professionals in identifying high-risk individuals and implementing targeted preventive strategies, potentially lowering the incidence of major depression in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"25998"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM25998","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for major depression risk in adult patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), offering evidence for targeted prevention and intervention.

Methods: Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2005 to 2018, 1098 adults with CHD were included. A weighted logistic regression model was applied to construct and validate a nomogram-based prediction tool for major depression in this population.

Results: The weighted prevalence of major depression among these patients was 13.95%. Multivariate weighted logistic regression revealed that waist circumference, smoking status, arthritis, sleep disorders, and restricted work capacity were independent risk factors for major depression (odds ratio (OR) >1, p < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in the nomogram model for both the development and validation cohorts were 0.816 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.776-0.857) and 0.765 (95% CI: 0.699-0.832), respectively, indicating the model possessed strong discriminative ability. Brier scores in the development and validation cohorts were 0.107 and 0.127, respectively, both well below the 0.25 threshold, demonstrating good calibration. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that when the threshold probability for major depression ranged from 0.04 to 0.54 in the development group and from 0.08 to 0.52 in the validation group, the nomogram provided the highest clinical net benefit compared to "Treat All" and "Treat None" strategies, confirming its strong clinical utility.

Conclusions: With a weighted prevalence of 13.95%, this nomogram model shows excellent predictive performance and clinical relevance for predicting major depression risk in patients with CHD. Thus, the model can be applied to aid healthcare professionals in identifying high-risk individuals and implementing targeted preventive strategies, potentially lowering the incidence of major depression in this patient population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠心病患者重度抑郁风险预测模型的构建与验证:来自NHANES 2005-2018的见解
背景:本研究旨在建立并验证成年冠心病患者重度抑郁风险的预测模型,为有针对性的预防和干预提供依据。方法:利用2005 - 2018年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据,纳入1098名成人冠心病患者。应用加权逻辑回归模型构建并验证基于表态图的预测工具来预测该人群的重度抑郁症。结果:重性抑郁的加权患病率为13.95%。多因素加权logistic回归分析显示,腰围、吸烟状况、关节炎、睡眠障碍和工作能力受限是重度抑郁症的独立危险因素(优势比(OR) bb0.1, p < 0.05)。开发组和验证组的nomogram模型的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积分别为0.816(95%置信区间(CI) 0.776 ~ 0.857)和0.765 (95% CI: 0.699 ~ 0.832),表明该模型具有较强的判别能力。开发组和验证组的Brier评分分别为0.107和0.127,均远低于0.25的阈值,表明校准良好。决策曲线分析(DCA)显示,当发展组的重度抑郁症阈值概率在0.04 ~ 0.54之间,验证组的阈值概率在0.08 ~ 0.52之间时,nomogram临床净效益高于“治疗全部”和“不治疗”策略,证实了其较强的临床实用性。结论:该nomogram模型加权患病率为13.95%,对预测冠心病患者重度抑郁风险具有良好的预测效果和临床相关性。因此,该模型可用于帮助医疗保健专业人员识别高风险个体并实施有针对性的预防策略,从而潜在地降低这一患者群体中重度抑郁症的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Critical Reappraisal of Takotsubo Syndrome (TS) and Myocarditis Association: "The Myocarditis-Like Features" Seen in TS Are Secondary Changes and not True Myocarditis. Functional Substrate Mapping in Ablation for Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia. Potential Similarity of Serum Cholesterol Multivariate Coefficients in the Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Across Populations: A Review From the Seven Countries Study. Right Ventricular Function in Patients With Significant Tricuspid Regurgitation. Optimization of Distal Radial Access Into Clinical Routine Practice Through Ultrasound Guidance: A Review and Technical Guide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1