Lecturers' teaching competencies towards improving teaching and learning process in universities in Tanzania: Students' perspectives.

IF 3.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Heliyon Pub Date : 2025-01-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41683
Asia Mbwebwe Rubeba
{"title":"Lecturers' teaching competencies towards improving teaching and learning process in universities in Tanzania: Students' perspectives.","authors":"Asia Mbwebwe Rubeba","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined lecturers' teaching competencies at universities in the attempt to improve the teaching and learning process by considering students' perspectives. Specifically, the study examined indicators of lecturers' teaching competencies in universities as well as establishing whether there is a relationship between students' perceived lecturers' teaching competencies and students' demographic parameters. The study used a cross-sectional survey design to generate data from 422 undergraduate students from three public universities in Tanzania using a questionnaire. Means, standard deviations, percentages and the independent T-test were used to analyse data. Experts and peer reviews were carried out to determine the validity of the study. The study's reliability was assessed using Cronbach Alpha in which content competency = 0.889, pedagogical competency = 0.809, assessment and evaluation skills = 0.701, and technological competency = 0.777 show acceptance of theoretical constructs. From the findings, students perceived content, pedagogical, assessment and technological competencies are key indicators of lecturers' teaching competencies that improve the teaching and learning process. Based on demographic factors, there was no relationship among the four variables. These findings imply that university lecturers are required to possess and master the perceived competencies and see how best they connect these competencies to students' needs, beliefs and aspirations during their teaching processes. Thus, in designing their lesson, lecturers have to consider the four teaching competencies, which in turn may improve students' performance. The study recommends a policy guideline by the Tanzania Commission for Universities for academicians to undergo training on assessment, pedagogy and technology. This will help lecturers to develop a common understanding of the teaching competencies and maintain teaching quality. Furthermore, universities should mobilize their resources and set aside enough funds to buy ICT facilities so that lecturers can easily integrate technology into their teaching processes so as to meet the current demand for technological advancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":12894,"journal":{"name":"Heliyon","volume":"11 1","pages":"e41683"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760326/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heliyon","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41683","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined lecturers' teaching competencies at universities in the attempt to improve the teaching and learning process by considering students' perspectives. Specifically, the study examined indicators of lecturers' teaching competencies in universities as well as establishing whether there is a relationship between students' perceived lecturers' teaching competencies and students' demographic parameters. The study used a cross-sectional survey design to generate data from 422 undergraduate students from three public universities in Tanzania using a questionnaire. Means, standard deviations, percentages and the independent T-test were used to analyse data. Experts and peer reviews were carried out to determine the validity of the study. The study's reliability was assessed using Cronbach Alpha in which content competency = 0.889, pedagogical competency = 0.809, assessment and evaluation skills = 0.701, and technological competency = 0.777 show acceptance of theoretical constructs. From the findings, students perceived content, pedagogical, assessment and technological competencies are key indicators of lecturers' teaching competencies that improve the teaching and learning process. Based on demographic factors, there was no relationship among the four variables. These findings imply that university lecturers are required to possess and master the perceived competencies and see how best they connect these competencies to students' needs, beliefs and aspirations during their teaching processes. Thus, in designing their lesson, lecturers have to consider the four teaching competencies, which in turn may improve students' performance. The study recommends a policy guideline by the Tanzania Commission for Universities for academicians to undergo training on assessment, pedagogy and technology. This will help lecturers to develop a common understanding of the teaching competencies and maintain teaching quality. Furthermore, universities should mobilize their resources and set aside enough funds to buy ICT facilities so that lecturers can easily integrate technology into their teaching processes so as to meet the current demand for technological advancement.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
讲师对改善坦桑尼亚大学教学和学习过程的教学能力:学生的观点。
本研究考察了大学讲师的教学能力,试图通过考虑学生的观点来改善教学过程。具体而言,该研究考察了大学讲师教学能力的指标,并确定学生感知的讲师教学能力与学生人口统计学参数之间是否存在关系。该研究采用横断面调查设计,通过问卷调查从坦桑尼亚三所公立大学的422名本科生中获取数据。采用均值、标准差、百分比和独立t检验对数据进行分析。通过专家和同行评议来确定研究的有效性。采用Cronbach Alpha对研究进行信度评估,其中内容能力= 0.889,教学能力= 0.809,评估与评价技能= 0.701,技术能力= 0.777表示对理论构念的接受。从研究结果来看,学生感知的内容、教学能力、评估能力和技术能力是教师改善教与学过程的教学能力的关键指标。基于人口统计学因素,四个变量之间没有关系。这些发现意味着大学讲师需要拥有和掌握感知能力,并看看他们如何在教学过程中最好地将这些能力与学生的需求、信念和愿望联系起来。因此,在设计课程时,讲师必须考虑四种教学能力,这反过来又可以提高学生的表现。这项研究建议坦桑尼亚大学委员会制定一项政策指导方针,让院士接受评估、教学法和技术方面的培训。这将有助于教师形成对教学能力的共同理解,并保持教学质量。此外,大学应该调动资源,拨出足够的资金购买ICT设备,以便讲师可以轻松地将技术融入他们的教学过程,以满足当前对技术进步的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heliyon
Heliyon MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
2793
期刊介绍: Heliyon is an all-science, open access journal that is part of the Cell Press family. Any paper reporting scientifically accurate and valuable research, which adheres to accepted ethical and scientific publishing standards, will be considered for publication. Our growing team of dedicated section editors, along with our in-house team, handle your paper and manage the publication process end-to-end, giving your research the editorial support it deserves.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for brainstem hemorrhage: A case-control study" [Heliyon Volume 10, Issue 4, February 2024, Article e25912]. Retraction notice to "Enhancing data security and privacy in energy applications: Integrating IoT and blockchain technologies" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e38917]. Retraction notice to "CREB1 promotes cholangiocarcinoma metastasis through transcriptional regulation of the LAYN-mediated TLN1/β1 integrin axis" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e36595]. Retraction notice to "Experimental investigations of dual functional substrate integrated waveguide antenna with enhanced directivity for 5G mobile communications" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e36929]. Retraction notice to "Nutritional and bioactive properties and antioxidant potential of Amaranthus tricolor, A. lividus, A viridis, and A. spinosus leafy vegetables" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e30453].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1