Navigating the "mode effect": A comparison of online questionnaires and face-to-face interviews.

IF 3.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Heliyon Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41742
Flora M Díaz-Pérez, Alan Fyall, Carlos Gustavo García-González, Xiaoxiao Fu, Gary Deel
{"title":"Navigating the \"mode effect\": A comparison of online questionnaires and face-to-face interviews.","authors":"Flora M Díaz-Pérez, Alan Fyall, Carlos Gustavo García-González, Xiaoxiao Fu, Gary Deel","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From a methodological perspective, the \"mode effect,\" which refers to the phenomenon where different survey methods can yield different responses despite asking the same questions, presents a significant contemporary challenge. Existing solutions suggested in the literature, such as the implementation of multi-mode surveys, have their drawbacks as they may introduce bias that could impact respondent behavior. This study aims to identify distinct visitor segments within two large populations, assessing their patterns of visitation to both national and state parks. Additionally, we aim to evaluate the presence of the \"mode effect\" when concurrently conducting face-to-face and online surveys. The primary contribution of this research lies in confirming the persistence of the \"mode effect,\" even when employing the same questionnaire for the same tourism product, during the same time frame, but among different populations. Furthermore, we propose various strategies to mitigate the \"mode effect.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":12894,"journal":{"name":"Heliyon","volume":"11 1","pages":"e41742"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heliyon","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41742","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From a methodological perspective, the "mode effect," which refers to the phenomenon where different survey methods can yield different responses despite asking the same questions, presents a significant contemporary challenge. Existing solutions suggested in the literature, such as the implementation of multi-mode surveys, have their drawbacks as they may introduce bias that could impact respondent behavior. This study aims to identify distinct visitor segments within two large populations, assessing their patterns of visitation to both national and state parks. Additionally, we aim to evaluate the presence of the "mode effect" when concurrently conducting face-to-face and online surveys. The primary contribution of this research lies in confirming the persistence of the "mode effect," even when employing the same questionnaire for the same tourism product, during the same time frame, but among different populations. Furthermore, we propose various strategies to mitigate the "mode effect."

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
驾驭“模式效应”:在线问卷调查与面对面访谈的比较。
从方法论的角度来看,“模式效应”是指不同的调查方法尽管提出了相同的问题,但却能产生不同的反应,这是一个重大的当代挑战。文献中提出的现有解决方案,如实施多模式调查,有其缺点,因为它们可能会引入影响被调查者行为的偏见。本研究旨在确定两个大群体中不同的游客群体,评估他们访问国家公园和州立公园的模式。此外,我们的目标是在同时进行面对面和在线调查时评估“模式效应”的存在。本研究的主要贡献在于确认了“模式效应”的持久性,即使在同一时间框架内对同一旅游产品使用相同的问卷调查,但在不同的人群中也是如此。此外,我们提出了各种策略来缓解“模式效应”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heliyon
Heliyon MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
2793
期刊介绍: Heliyon is an all-science, open access journal that is part of the Cell Press family. Any paper reporting scientifically accurate and valuable research, which adheres to accepted ethical and scientific publishing standards, will be considered for publication. Our growing team of dedicated section editors, along with our in-house team, handle your paper and manage the publication process end-to-end, giving your research the editorial support it deserves.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for brainstem hemorrhage: A case-control study" [Heliyon Volume 10, Issue 4, February 2024, Article e25912]. Retraction notice to "Enhancing data security and privacy in energy applications: Integrating IoT and blockchain technologies" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e38917]. Retraction notice to "CREB1 promotes cholangiocarcinoma metastasis through transcriptional regulation of the LAYN-mediated TLN1/β1 integrin axis" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e36595]. Retraction notice to "Experimental investigations of dual functional substrate integrated waveguide antenna with enhanced directivity for 5G mobile communications" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e36929]. Retraction notice to "Nutritional and bioactive properties and antioxidant potential of Amaranthus tricolor, A. lividus, A viridis, and A. spinosus leafy vegetables" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e30453].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1