Achieving cup target as per spinopelvic assessment is associated with improved THA outcome: a prospective, multicentre study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS HIP International Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1177/11207000241312654
Jeroen C F Verhaegen, Moritz Innmann, Camille Vorimore, Christian Merle, George Grammatopoulos
{"title":"Achieving cup target as per spinopelvic assessment is associated with improved THA outcome: a prospective, multicentre study.","authors":"Jeroen C F Verhaegen, Moritz Innmann, Camille Vorimore, Christian Merle, George Grammatopoulos","doi":"10.1177/11207000241312654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different methods can help to optimise sagittal cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) based on individual spinopelvic characteristics. This study aimed to: (1) assess how often combined sagittal index (CSI) and hip-spine-classification targets were achieved post THA; (2) compare anteversion/inclination between cups in-/outside optimal CSI zone; and (3) determine association with outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicentre, prospective, case-cohort study of 435 primary THA for osteoarthritis (53% females; age: 65 ± 12 years; follow-up: 2.4 ± 0.6 years) (58% lateral, 29% anterior, 13% posterior approach). No robotics or dual-mobility were used. Patients underwent spinopelvic radiographs to measure parameters including lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic femoral angle (PFA), and ante-inclination (AI) on lateral spinopelvic radiographs. Unbalanced spine was defined as PI - LL ⩾ 10° (PI: pelvic incidence; LL: lumbar lordosis), stiffness as ∆LL < 20°. Optimal cup orientation was based on CSI targets: 205-245° for balanced spine (<i>n =</i> 327), or 215-235° for unbalanced spine (<i>n =</i> 108), hip-spine classification targets (±5°), and conventional inclination/anteversion (40/20° ± 10°) target. Patient-reported outcome was measured using Oxford Hip Score (OHS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CSI targets were achieved in 60% (<i>n =</i> 261/435), whilst 44% had cup position within hip-spine classification targets (<i>n =</i> 125/284). Anteversion was higher among cups within CSI targets (26° ± 8° vs. 22° ± 10°; <i>p <</i> 0.001). Overall dislocation rate was 0.9% (<i>n =</i> 4/435), without difference whether CSI targets were achieved (0.4% vs. 1.7%; <i>p =</i> 0.178). Postoperative OHS was better among those within CSI targets (42 ± 8 vs. 40 ± 9; <i>p =</i> 0.003) or within hip-spine-classification targets (<i>p =</i> 0.028), but not according to conventional orientation (<i>p =</i> 0.384).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Awareness of adverse spinopelvic characteristics and using sagittal characteristics (especially CSI) can help surgeons to achieve optimal cup orientation, improving outcome and reducing dislocation risk post-THA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"130-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000241312654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Different methods can help to optimise sagittal cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) based on individual spinopelvic characteristics. This study aimed to: (1) assess how often combined sagittal index (CSI) and hip-spine-classification targets were achieved post THA; (2) compare anteversion/inclination between cups in-/outside optimal CSI zone; and (3) determine association with outcome.

Methods: This is a multicentre, prospective, case-cohort study of 435 primary THA for osteoarthritis (53% females; age: 65 ± 12 years; follow-up: 2.4 ± 0.6 years) (58% lateral, 29% anterior, 13% posterior approach). No robotics or dual-mobility were used. Patients underwent spinopelvic radiographs to measure parameters including lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic femoral angle (PFA), and ante-inclination (AI) on lateral spinopelvic radiographs. Unbalanced spine was defined as PI - LL ⩾ 10° (PI: pelvic incidence; LL: lumbar lordosis), stiffness as ∆LL < 20°. Optimal cup orientation was based on CSI targets: 205-245° for balanced spine (n = 327), or 215-235° for unbalanced spine (n = 108), hip-spine classification targets (±5°), and conventional inclination/anteversion (40/20° ± 10°) target. Patient-reported outcome was measured using Oxford Hip Score (OHS).

Results: CSI targets were achieved in 60% (n = 261/435), whilst 44% had cup position within hip-spine classification targets (n = 125/284). Anteversion was higher among cups within CSI targets (26° ± 8° vs. 22° ± 10°; p < 0.001). Overall dislocation rate was 0.9% (n = 4/435), without difference whether CSI targets were achieved (0.4% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.178). Postoperative OHS was better among those within CSI targets (42 ± 8 vs. 40 ± 9; p = 0.003) or within hip-spine-classification targets (p = 0.028), but not according to conventional orientation (p = 0.384).

Conclusions: Awareness of adverse spinopelvic characteristics and using sagittal characteristics (especially CSI) can help surgeons to achieve optimal cup orientation, improving outcome and reducing dislocation risk post-THA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据脊柱骨盆评估实现杯杯目标与THA预后改善相关:一项前瞻性、多中心研究。
背景:不同的方法可以帮助优化全髋关节置换术(THA)中基于个体脊柱骨盆特征的矢状杯定位。本研究的目的是:(1)评估THA术后矢状指数(CSI)和髋脊柱分类指标实现的频率;(2)比较最优CSI区域内外杯子的前倾/倾斜度;(3)确定与结果的关联。方法:这是一项多中心、前瞻性、病例队列研究,纳入了435例原发性骨关节炎THA患者(53%为女性;年龄:65±12岁;随访:2.4±0.6年)(58%外侧入路,29%前路,13%后路)。没有使用机器人或双机动性。患者接受脊柱骨盆x线片测量参数,包括腰椎前凸(LL)、骶骨斜度(SS)、骨盆倾斜(PT)、骨盆发生率(PI)、骨盆股角(PFA)和侧位脊柱骨盆x线片前倾角(AI)。不平衡脊柱定义为PI - LL小于10°(PI:骨盆发生率;LL:腰椎前凸),僵硬度∆LL n = 327),或不平衡脊柱(n = 108)的215-235°,髋-脊柱分类目标(±5°)和传统的倾斜/前倾(40/20°±10°)目标。采用牛津髋部评分(OHS)测量患者报告的结果。结果:60%的患者达到了CSI目标(n = 261/435), 44%的患者杯位在髋-脊柱分类目标范围内(n = 125/284)。在CSI目标内的杯子前倾更高(26°±8°vs 22°±10°);p 0.001)。总体脱位率为0.9% (n = 4/435),是否达到CSI目标没有差异(0.4% vs. 1.7%;p = 0.178)。术后OHS在CSI指标范围内较好(42±8比40±9);P = 0.003)或在髋-脊柱分类目标范围内(P = 0.028),但不符合常规定向(P = 0.384)。结论:意识到不利的脊柱骨盆特征并使用矢状位特征(尤其是CSI)可以帮助外科医生获得最佳的椎杯定位,改善预后并降低tha后脱位风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
期刊最新文献
Partial 2-stage exchange for chronic periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Tantalum metal cups and augments versus custom-made 3D-printed trabecular titanium implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B acetabular defects: mid-term results. Conversion total hip arthroplasty following failed proximal femoral fixation: current concepts review. An algorithm for automated femoral leg length and offset calculations on pelvis radiographs. Identifying patients at risk for short-term adverse events after hip arthroscopy: a machine learning analysis of a national database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1