Differences in brain volume in individuals with mild cognitive impairment and normal cognition across different anatomical regions: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1177/13872877251313816
Fernando Mijares Diaz, Alessandro Orlando, Andrea Lc Schneider, James R Pike, Clifford R Jack, Jennifer A Deal, A Richey Sharrett
{"title":"Differences in brain volume in individuals with mild cognitive impairment and normal cognition across different anatomical regions: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.","authors":"Fernando Mijares Diaz, Alessandro Orlando, Andrea Lc Schneider, James R Pike, Clifford R Jack, Jennifer A Deal, A Richey Sharrett","doi":"10.1177/13872877251313816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMild cognitive impairment (MCI) represents a stage between cognitively normal and Alzheimer's disease. Despite much published research on MCI, there continues to be a knowledge gap of volumetric brain changes in MCI versus cognitively normal (CN) in racially diverse, community-based samples.ObjectiveThe study aimed to understand differences in volume of selected brain regions in individuals with MCI versus those who are cognitively normal.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study with 1835 participants, which sampled all cognitively impaired participants (n = 667) and a subsample of cognitively normal participants from the ARIC neurocognitive study (ARIC-NCS). All individuals underwent a brain MRI. Two models (5 versus 22 regions of interest [ROI]) were built to analyze differences in brain volume between cognitively normal and MCI, and among 3 cognitive domains (memory, language, executive function). Using previous visits data, we estimated the standard deviations of 20-year cognitive decline equivalent to the difference in brain volume between MCI and CN.ResultsEvery lobe was significantly smaller in individuals with MCI, with the largest difference observed in the temporal lobe. Moreover, there was a significant difference between MCI and CN in every subregion within the temporal lobe. The difference in volume between CN and MCI was equivalent to the total brain volume difference associated with a 1.24 standard deviation greater long-term cognitive decline.ConclusionsLoss of volume in all cortical lobes, but particularly in the temporal lobe, was associated with MCI. Additionally, significant volume differences were observed in the temporal lobe in all three cognitive domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"43-51"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251313816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMild cognitive impairment (MCI) represents a stage between cognitively normal and Alzheimer's disease. Despite much published research on MCI, there continues to be a knowledge gap of volumetric brain changes in MCI versus cognitively normal (CN) in racially diverse, community-based samples.ObjectiveThe study aimed to understand differences in volume of selected brain regions in individuals with MCI versus those who are cognitively normal.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study with 1835 participants, which sampled all cognitively impaired participants (n = 667) and a subsample of cognitively normal participants from the ARIC neurocognitive study (ARIC-NCS). All individuals underwent a brain MRI. Two models (5 versus 22 regions of interest [ROI]) were built to analyze differences in brain volume between cognitively normal and MCI, and among 3 cognitive domains (memory, language, executive function). Using previous visits data, we estimated the standard deviations of 20-year cognitive decline equivalent to the difference in brain volume between MCI and CN.ResultsEvery lobe was significantly smaller in individuals with MCI, with the largest difference observed in the temporal lobe. Moreover, there was a significant difference between MCI and CN in every subregion within the temporal lobe. The difference in volume between CN and MCI was equivalent to the total brain volume difference associated with a 1.24 standard deviation greater long-term cognitive decline.ConclusionsLoss of volume in all cortical lobes, but particularly in the temporal lobe, was associated with MCI. Additionally, significant volume differences were observed in the temporal lobe in all three cognitive domains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同解剖区域轻度认知障碍和正常认知个体的脑容量差异:社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究
背景:轻度认知障碍(MCI)是介于认知正常和阿尔茨海默病之间的一个阶段。尽管发表了许多关于MCI的研究,但在种族多样化、以社区为基础的样本中,MCI与认知正常(CN)的脑容量变化仍然存在知识差距。目的:该研究旨在了解轻度认知障碍患者与认知正常患者在选定脑区体积上的差异。方法:这是一项有1835名参与者的横断面研究,其中包括来自ARIC神经认知研究(ARIC- ncs)的所有认知受损参与者(n = 667)和认知正常参与者的子样本。所有人都接受了脑部核磁共振检查。建立了两个模型(5对22感兴趣区域[ROI])来分析认知正常和MCI之间以及3个认知领域(记忆、语言、执行功能)之间脑容量的差异。使用以前的访问数据,我们估计了20年认知衰退的标准偏差,相当于MCI和CN之间的脑容量差异。结果:MCI患者的每个脑叶均明显变小,其中颞叶差异最大。此外,MCI和CN在颞叶各亚区均有显著性差异。CN和MCI之间的体积差异相当于与1.24个标准偏差较大的长期认知能力下降相关的总脑容量差异。结论:所有皮质叶的体积损失,尤其是颞叶的体积损失与轻度认知损伤有关。此外,在所有三个认知领域的颞叶中观察到显著的体积差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
期刊最新文献
Immunoglobulin allotypes and RELN alleles and humoral immunity to HSV1 in patients with Alzheimer's disease and matched controls. Association of genetic variants in cyclin-dependent kinase 5 with Alzheimer's disease in a Saudi cohort. Lifelong heat exposure as a potential contributor to Alzheimer's disease resilience. Early cognitive screening for individuals on the dementia continuum: A novel approach amid current trends. Amyloid-β 1-42 fibrils regulate SH-SY5Y cell adhesion in a delayed manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1