Gait, balance, and physical performance as markers of early Alzheimer's disease and related dementia risk.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1177/13872877241313144
Magdalena I Tolea, Amie Rosenfeld, Sam Van Roy, Lilah M Besser, Deirdre M O'Shea, James E Galvin
{"title":"Gait, balance, and physical performance as markers of early Alzheimer's disease and related dementia risk.","authors":"Magdalena I Tolea, Amie Rosenfeld, Sam Van Roy, Lilah M Besser, Deirdre M O'Shea, James E Galvin","doi":"10.1177/13872877241313144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDeclining physical functionality is an indicator of cognitive impairment, distinguishing normal cognition (NC) from dementia. Whether this extends to pre-dementia stages is unclear.ObjectiveAssess physical performance patterns, evaluate relationships with imaging biomarkers, and identify specific measures distinguishing NC, subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).MethodsGroup differences (78 NC, 35 SCD, and 41 MCI) in physical function (global function, balance, gait speed, step length, single leg support) were evaluated with logistic regression while distinguishing between MCI due-to-AD and MCI due-to-vascular etiology. Relationships with imaging biomarkers (cortical atrophy score, white matter hyperintensities volumes) were analyzed with ANCOVA.ResultsParticipants were 68.6 ± 9.3 years old, had 16.2 ± 3.0 years of education, and 23% were ethnoracial minorities. Physical performance distinguished MCI from NC and SCD. Greater performance on the Mini Physical Performance Test (mini PPT) and balance were associated with lower odds of being SCD versus NC (OR<sub>mini PPT</sub> = 0.73; 95% CI:0.56-0.97; OR<sub>balance</sub> = 0.35, 95%CI:0.16-0.80). AD etiology accounted for most group differences in physical performance versus vascular etiology. Consistent associations between biomarkers, physical performance, and cognition were found.ConclusionsFindings suggest that: 1) changes in mini PPT performance and balance may help detect cognitive impairments, as early as the SCD stage; 2) changes in gait speed, gait cycle parameters, and Timed Up-and-Go may indicate more significant cognitive impairment; 3) neuronal loss is linked to subtle changes in physical functionality as early as SCD. Physical performance may be a valuable tool in early dementia detection in clinical settings and could identify targets for early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"S185-S199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241313144","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDeclining physical functionality is an indicator of cognitive impairment, distinguishing normal cognition (NC) from dementia. Whether this extends to pre-dementia stages is unclear.ObjectiveAssess physical performance patterns, evaluate relationships with imaging biomarkers, and identify specific measures distinguishing NC, subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).MethodsGroup differences (78 NC, 35 SCD, and 41 MCI) in physical function (global function, balance, gait speed, step length, single leg support) were evaluated with logistic regression while distinguishing between MCI due-to-AD and MCI due-to-vascular etiology. Relationships with imaging biomarkers (cortical atrophy score, white matter hyperintensities volumes) were analyzed with ANCOVA.ResultsParticipants were 68.6 ± 9.3 years old, had 16.2 ± 3.0 years of education, and 23% were ethnoracial minorities. Physical performance distinguished MCI from NC and SCD. Greater performance on the Mini Physical Performance Test (mini PPT) and balance were associated with lower odds of being SCD versus NC (ORmini PPT = 0.73; 95% CI:0.56-0.97; ORbalance = 0.35, 95%CI:0.16-0.80). AD etiology accounted for most group differences in physical performance versus vascular etiology. Consistent associations between biomarkers, physical performance, and cognition were found.ConclusionsFindings suggest that: 1) changes in mini PPT performance and balance may help detect cognitive impairments, as early as the SCD stage; 2) changes in gait speed, gait cycle parameters, and Timed Up-and-Go may indicate more significant cognitive impairment; 3) neuronal loss is linked to subtle changes in physical functionality as early as SCD. Physical performance may be a valuable tool in early dementia detection in clinical settings and could identify targets for early intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
步态、平衡和身体表现作为早期阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆风险的标志。
背景:身体功能下降是认知障碍的一项指标,可将正常认知(NC)与痴呆区分开来。这是否会延伸到痴呆前期尚不清楚。目的:评估身体表现模式,评估与成像生物标志物的关系,并确定区分NC、主观认知衰退(SCD)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的具体措施。方法:在区分ad所致MCI和血管所致MCI的同时,采用logistic回归评估各组(78例NC、35例SCD和41例MCI)身体功能(整体功能、平衡、步态速度、步长、单腿支撑)的差异。用ANCOVA分析与成像生物标志物(皮质萎缩评分、白质高信号体积)的关系。结果:参与者年龄68.6±9.3岁,文化程度16.2±3.0年,少数民族占23%。物理性能将MCI与NC和SCD区分开来。在Mini Physical performance Test (Mini PPT)和平衡性方面表现较好与SCD的几率较低相关(ORmini PPT = 0.73;95%置信区间:0.56—-0.97;ORbalance = 0.35, 95%CI:0.16-0.80)。阿尔茨海默病的病因与血管病因在体能表现上的组间差异最大。生物标志物、身体表现和认知之间存在一致的关联。结论:研究结果提示:1)小PPT表现和平衡的变化可能有助于早在SCD阶段发现认知障碍;2)步态速度、步态周期参数和time Up-and-Go的变化可能预示着更严重的认知障碍;3)早在SCD时,神经元的丧失就与身体功能的细微变化有关。在临床环境中,身体表现可能是早期痴呆症检测的一个有价值的工具,可以确定早期干预的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
期刊最新文献
Unpacking uncertainty in polygenic risk scores: Playing "risk score roulette". Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein as a potential biomarker for differentiating amyloid-negative subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment. The performance of plasma pTau181 and pTau217 in distinguishing Alzheimer's disease from various neurodegenerative disorders, psychiatric disorders, and cognitively unimpaired controls. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of interventions for persons living with Alzheimer's disease: The role of music therapy. Association between retinal neurodegeneration assessed by optical coherence tomography and PET-detected cerebral amyloid burden in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1