Novel omnipolar mapping technology for effective superior vena cava isolation: A randomized clinical trial

IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Arrhythmia Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1002/joa3.70007
Naoto Oguri MD, Yousaku Okubo MD, PhD, Naoki Ishibashi MD, Junji Maeda MD, Takumi Sakai MD, Yukimi Uotani MD, Motoki Furutani MD, Shogo Miyamoto MD, Shunsuke Miyauchi MD, PhD, Sho Okamura MD, PhD, Takehito Tokuyama MD, PhD, Noboru Oda MD, PhD, Yukiko Nakano MD, PhD
{"title":"Novel omnipolar mapping technology for effective superior vena cava isolation: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Naoto Oguri MD,&nbsp;Yousaku Okubo MD, PhD,&nbsp;Naoki Ishibashi MD,&nbsp;Junji Maeda MD,&nbsp;Takumi Sakai MD,&nbsp;Yukimi Uotani MD,&nbsp;Motoki Furutani MD,&nbsp;Shogo Miyamoto MD,&nbsp;Shunsuke Miyauchi MD, PhD,&nbsp;Sho Okamura MD, PhD,&nbsp;Takehito Tokuyama MD, PhD,&nbsp;Noboru Oda MD, PhD,&nbsp;Yukiko Nakano MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Successful isolation of the superior vena cava (SVC) using a functional conduction block between the right atrium (RA) and SVC has been documented. However, a comparison of this approach with the conventional method (CM) of circumferential ablation of the RA-SVC junction, based on angiography, remains unexplored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, we employed the innovative omnipolar mapping technology (OT) to discern the RA-SVC connection and compared clinical outcomes with those from CM.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-two patients undergoing SVC isolation were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the OT or CM group. No significant differences in the baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. We assessed the efficacy and safety of both groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both groups showed comparable acute success rates (96%) in SVC isolation, but the procedure in the OT group required fewer radiofrequency (RF) applications (13.6 ± 6.0 vs. 19.8 ± 10.9, <i>p</i> = .046) and shorter procedure time (9.6 ± 6.8 min vs. 14.3 ± 6.8 min, <i>p</i> = .007). The overall absorbed dose was notably lower in the OT group (69.6 ± 47.6 mGy vs. 90.3 ± 30.3 mGy, <i>p</i> = .023).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The OT enhances the efficacy of SVC isolation, requiring fewer RF applications and reducing procedure time compared to conventional treatment methods.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Successful isolation of the superior vena cava (SVC) using a functional conduction block between the right atrium (RA) and SVC has been documented. However, a comparison of this approach with the conventional method (CM) of circumferential ablation of the RA-SVC junction, based on angiography, remains unexplored.

Objective

In this study, we employed the innovative omnipolar mapping technology (OT) to discern the RA-SVC connection and compared clinical outcomes with those from CM.

Methods

Sixty-two patients undergoing SVC isolation were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the OT or CM group. No significant differences in the baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. We assessed the efficacy and safety of both groups.

Results

Both groups showed comparable acute success rates (96%) in SVC isolation, but the procedure in the OT group required fewer radiofrequency (RF) applications (13.6 ± 6.0 vs. 19.8 ± 10.9, p = .046) and shorter procedure time (9.6 ± 6.8 min vs. 14.3 ± 6.8 min, p = .007). The overall absorbed dose was notably lower in the OT group (69.6 ± 47.6 mGy vs. 90.3 ± 30.3 mGy, p = .023).

Conclusions

The OT enhances the efficacy of SVC isolation, requiring fewer RF applications and reducing procedure time compared to conventional treatment methods.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有效隔离上腔静脉的新型全极定位技术:一项随机临床试验。
背景:使用右心房(RA)和上腔静脉(SVC)之间的功能性传导阻滞成功分离上腔静脉(SVC)已被证实。然而,这种方法与基于血管造影的RA-SVC连接处的常规方法(CM)的环形消融的比较仍未被探索。目的:在本研究中,我们采用创新的全极定位技术(OT)来识别RA-SVC连接,并将临床结果与CM进行比较。方法:62例接受SVC分离的患者按1:1的比例随机分为OT组或CM组。两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。我们评估了两组的疗效和安全性。结果:两组SVC分离的急性成功率相当(96%),但OT组需要较少的射频(RF)应用(13.6±6.0 vs. 19.8±10.9,p = 0.046)和更短的手术时间(9.6±6.8 min vs. 14.3±6.8 min, p = 0.007)。OT组总吸收剂量明显低于对照组(69.6±47.6 mGy vs. 90.3±30.3 mGy, p = 0.023)。结论:与常规治疗方法相比,OT增强了SVC分离的疗效,需要更少的射频应用,缩短了手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Evolving Role of Ivabradine for Focal Atrial Tachycardia: A Systematic Review. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Children: A 14-Year Population-Based Study. An Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Predictor of Successful Micra Implantation on the Right Ventricular Mid-Septum. Anatomical Predictors of Optimal Cryoballoon Size Selection: A Prospective Comparison of 28 mm Versus 31 mm Size-Adjustable Balloon Modes. Reduced Vascular Complications After Catheter Ablation Applying Sonography-Guidance and Modified Postprocedural Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1