Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria: Analysis from patients in a laboratory network in Brazil

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of global antimicrobial resistance Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jgar.2025.01.019
Amanda Azevedo Bittencourt , Thales José Polis , Vinicius Lima Faustino , Paula de Mendonça Batista , Ana Carolina Padula Ribeiro Pereira , Marina Della Negra de Paula , Darlan Augusto da Costa Rocha , Paola Cappellano Daher , Jorge Luiz Mello Sampaio
{"title":"Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria: Analysis from patients in a laboratory network in Brazil","authors":"Amanda Azevedo Bittencourt ,&nbsp;Thales José Polis ,&nbsp;Vinicius Lima Faustino ,&nbsp;Paula de Mendonça Batista ,&nbsp;Ana Carolina Padula Ribeiro Pereira ,&nbsp;Marina Della Negra de Paula ,&nbsp;Darlan Augusto da Costa Rocha ,&nbsp;Paola Cappellano Daher ,&nbsp;Jorge Luiz Mello Sampaio","doi":"10.1016/j.jgar.2025.01.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to describe the epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of gram-negative pathogens in Brazil from 2018 to 2020, addressing the gap in national data on healthcare-associated infections, using information from a private laboratory network.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted using a database from Fleury hospital network, a private laboratory in Brazil. The analysis included blood, urine, and lower respiratory tract samples collected from January 2018 to June 2020. The study included consecutive non-duplicated isolates of <em>Enterobacterales</em> or <em>P. aeruginosa</em> from inpatients aged ≥18 years old. Bacterial identification was performed using mass spectrometry, and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined following EUCAST/BrCAST guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 25,180 isolates were included in the analysis. Most of the sample consisted of female patients (57.9%), with a mean age of 70 years (SD 18.1). <em>Enterobacterales</em> were the most prevalent pathogens found (76.2%), while <em>P. aeruginosa</em> was present in the remaining 23.8%. In terms of antimicrobial susceptibility, <em>Enterobacterales</em> exhibited a higher susceptibility rate to ceftazidime/avibactam (97.1%) and amikacin (95.6%), while <em>P. aeruginosa</em> showed a higher susceptibility rate to polymyxin B (97.1%) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (86.6%). Among carbapenem-resistant <em>P. aeruginosa</em> isolates, 75% were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Additionally, 24.2% of K<em>. pneumoniae complex</em> samples were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div><em>Enterobacterales</em> was the most frequently encountered group in Brazil. Ceftazidime/avibactam and amikacin demonstrated the highest efficacy against this group, while ceftolozane/tazobactam and polymyxin had the highest efficacy against <em>P. aeruginosa</em>. This highlights the importance of new β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for the treatment of gram-negative infections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 266-271"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716525000268","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to describe the epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of gram-negative pathogens in Brazil from 2018 to 2020, addressing the gap in national data on healthcare-associated infections, using information from a private laboratory network.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted using a database from Fleury hospital network, a private laboratory in Brazil. The analysis included blood, urine, and lower respiratory tract samples collected from January 2018 to June 2020. The study included consecutive non-duplicated isolates of Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa from inpatients aged ≥18 years old. Bacterial identification was performed using mass spectrometry, and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined following EUCAST/BrCAST guidelines.

Results

A total of 25,180 isolates were included in the analysis. Most of the sample consisted of female patients (57.9%), with a mean age of 70 years (SD 18.1). Enterobacterales were the most prevalent pathogens found (76.2%), while P. aeruginosa was present in the remaining 23.8%. In terms of antimicrobial susceptibility, Enterobacterales exhibited a higher susceptibility rate to ceftazidime/avibactam (97.1%) and amikacin (95.6%), while P. aeruginosa showed a higher susceptibility rate to polymyxin B (97.1%) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (86.6%). Among carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates, 75% were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Additionally, 24.2% of K. pneumoniae complex samples were identified.

Conclusion

Enterobacterales was the most frequently encountered group in Brazil. Ceftazidime/avibactam and amikacin demonstrated the highest efficacy against this group, while ceftolozane/tazobactam and polymyxin had the highest efficacy against P. aeruginosa. This highlights the importance of new β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for the treatment of gram-negative infections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
革兰氏阴性细菌的抗菌药敏感性:巴西实验室网络中对患者的分析。
目的:本研究旨在描述2018年至2020年巴西革兰氏阴性病原体的流行病学和抗菌药物敏感性模式,利用来自私人实验室网络的信息,解决国家卫生保健相关感染数据的空白。方法:采用巴西私人实验室Fleury医院网络数据库进行横断面研究。分析包括2018年1月至2020年6月收集的血液、尿液和下呼吸道样本。该研究包括从≥18岁住院患者中连续分离的肠杆菌或铜绿假单胞菌。采用质谱法进行细菌鉴定,并根据EUCAST/BrCAST指南测定抗菌药物敏感性。结果:共纳入菌株25180株。样本以女性患者为主(57.9%),平均年龄70岁(SD 18.1)。病原菌以肠杆菌最多(76.2%),铜绿假单胞菌最多(23.8%)。在抗菌药物敏感性方面,肠杆菌对头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(97.1%)和阿米卡星(95.6%)的敏感性较高,P. aeruginosa对多粘菌素B(97.1%)和头孢甲苯/他唑巴坦(86.6%)的敏感性较高。在耐碳青霉烯的铜绿假单胞菌中,75%的菌株对头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦敏感。肺炎克雷伯菌复合体的检出率为24.2%。结论:肠杆菌是巴西最常见的菌群。头孢他啶/阿维巴坦和阿米卡星对该组的疗效最高,而头孢唑嗪/他唑巴坦和多粘菌素对铜绿假单胞菌的疗效最高。这突出了新的β-内酰胺-β-内酰胺酶抑制剂联合治疗革兰氏阴性感染的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of global antimicrobial resistance
Journal of global antimicrobial resistance INFECTIOUS DISEASES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (JGAR) is a quarterly online journal run by an international Editorial Board that focuses on the global spread of antibiotic-resistant microbes. JGAR is a dedicated journal for all professionals working in research, health care, the environment and animal infection control, aiming to track the resistance threat worldwide and provides a single voice devoted to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Featuring peer-reviewed and up to date research articles, reviews, short notes and hot topics JGAR covers the key topics related to antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and antiparasitic resistance.
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial resistance in the Bacteroides fragilis group: national multicenter survey and Bayesian modelling study, France, 2022-2023. Characterization of tmexCD2-toprJ2-carrying carbapenem-resistant Raoultella ornithinolytica from hospital sewage in Zhejiang Province of China, 2022-2023. Intervention studies and antimicrobial resistance in Italy: an overview of the latest evidence. A combination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-derived sRNA and endogenous miRNA in circulation as novel auxiliary diagnostic markers for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Deconstructing antimicrobial resistance national action plans: A gender-perspective driven mixed-methods analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1