Impact of Age and Body Mass Index on the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Mesh Sacrocolpopexy.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetrics and Gynecology International Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ogi/1706041
Nour Khalil, Nadine El Kassis, Malak Moubarak, Christian Chaccour, Samer Maalouf, Elie Nemr, Houssein El Hajj, Maroun Moukarzel, David Atallah
{"title":"Impact of Age and Body Mass Index on the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Mesh Sacrocolpopexy.","authors":"Nour Khalil, Nadine El Kassis, Malak Moubarak, Christian Chaccour, Samer Maalouf, Elie Nemr, Houssein El Hajj, Maroun Moukarzel, David Atallah","doi":"10.1155/ogi/1706041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a benign condition that can adversely affect women's quality of life. Mesh sacrocolpopexy is an effective surgical treatment for POP, but is considered a complex and risky surgery for obese and elderly women. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of age and obesity on the outcomes of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective cohort study reviewing all minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy cases performed between 2003 and 2021. Data on operative time, hospital stay, conversion rate, perioperative injuries, early and late postoperative complications were collected. Surgical success was evaluated by gynecological examination at each follow-up visit. <b>Results:</b> One hundred seventy subjects were included, of whom 44% were older than 65 years and 58% had a body mass index (BMI) above 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Seventy percent presented stage III uterovaginal prolapse. All patients achieved a good subjective outcome with no reported prolapse with a mean follow-up of 6 years. The rate of de novo stress urinary incontinence was 3.2%. Vaginal implant exposure was found in 4% of cases. A bivariate analysis studying the impact of older age (≥ 65 vs. < 65 years) and higher BMI (≥ 25 vs. < 25) on surgical and postoperative outcomes did not show any significant differences between the subgroups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> In experienced hands, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy can be used as a safe and effective procedure for operable patients with POP, even when patients are between 65 and 80 years or have a BMI of 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and above.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"1706041"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ogi/1706041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a benign condition that can adversely affect women's quality of life. Mesh sacrocolpopexy is an effective surgical treatment for POP, but is considered a complex and risky surgery for obese and elderly women. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of age and obesity on the outcomes of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study reviewing all minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy cases performed between 2003 and 2021. Data on operative time, hospital stay, conversion rate, perioperative injuries, early and late postoperative complications were collected. Surgical success was evaluated by gynecological examination at each follow-up visit. Results: One hundred seventy subjects were included, of whom 44% were older than 65 years and 58% had a body mass index (BMI) above 25 kg/m2. Seventy percent presented stage III uterovaginal prolapse. All patients achieved a good subjective outcome with no reported prolapse with a mean follow-up of 6 years. The rate of de novo stress urinary incontinence was 3.2%. Vaginal implant exposure was found in 4% of cases. A bivariate analysis studying the impact of older age (≥ 65 vs. < 65 years) and higher BMI (≥ 25 vs. < 25) on surgical and postoperative outcomes did not show any significant differences between the subgroups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: In experienced hands, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy can be used as a safe and effective procedure for operable patients with POP, even when patients are between 65 and 80 years or have a BMI of 25 kg/m2 and above.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Obstetrics and Gynecology International OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Obstetrics and Gynecology International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a forum for scientists and clinical professionals working in obstetrics and gynecology. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine and infertility, reproductive endocrinology, and sexual medicine.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Age and Body Mass Index on the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Mesh Sacrocolpopexy. Cord Blood Platelet-Rich Plasma in Cesarean Section Wound Management. COVID-19 and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Descriptive Study From a Tertiary Hospital in Ras Al Khaimah, UAE. BRCA1 Protein Expression in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer and Associated Clinicopathological Factors in Uganda. The Effect of "Motivational Interviewing" and "Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills Model" Counseling Interventions on the Choice of Delivery Mode in Pregnant Women Using Face-to-Face Training vs. Mobile App: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1